Massachusetts Apple Report
Vol. 79 No. 7 OCTOBER 30, 2001
UMASS Eastern Extension Center—240 Beaver St., Waltham
NOVEMBER 16. Deadline for submitting application—NOVEMBER 9.
QUESTIONS CALL—617-626-1785.
Cabot Motor Inn, Lancaster,
NH. NOVEMBER 1. Registration required. Call 603-788-4961
![]()
Apples that are being shipped to
CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, NEW MEXICO, IDAHO AND UTAH must be certified by the Massachusetts
Department of Food and Agriculture, Bureau of Farm Products, to have been
in cold storage for a period of at least 40 days or more with the temperature
at 32 degrees F or less.
Apples in controlled atmosphere must
be in CA storage for a continuous period of 60 days with the temperature
at 38 degrees F or less and said storage room or building has been
approved as a controlled atmosphere facility by the proper authority.
Questions, call George Porter at
617-626-1800.
![]()
More lawmakers
are jumping on the ant-terrorism bandwagon and calling for new laws to protect
farms and the food supply.
“Our nation’s food supply is at very high risk<” said Sen. Pat Roberts,
R-Kan., a key member or the Senate Agriculture Committee.
Roberts, who has introduced anti-agriterrorism legislation, says major
diseases could wipe out portions of the food supply.
Roberts has introduced the Bio-Security for Agriculture Act, which
calls for spending $1.1 billion next year and $2.7 billion during the following
decade for a crash program to beef up food safety and security, develop new
protections against terrorism and fund research to fight man-made diseases
that might be used in economic warfare against the U.S.
“Frankly, I am very worried,” said Roberts, pointing out that one of
the terrorists involved in the Sept. 11 attacks was trained in agriculture
and had worked in Saudi Arabia on a family produce farm that grew lemons and
other crops.
He said scientists in other countries have in the past, developed pathogens
capable of devastating crops. He said
these could be used to attack the U.S. economy.
“The loss of markets resulting from the introduction of these pathogens
would be devastating to our nation’s economy,” he said.
Other lawmakers have proposed similar measures, including the Edwards-Hagel
bill sponsored by Sens. John Edwards, D-N.C., and Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., which
calls for spending $1.65 billion to enhance public safety through the Centers
for Disease Control, National Institutes of Health, and the U.S. Department
of Agriculture. Fully $450 million
of this money would be devoted to food safety and security.
Edwards pointed to animal and plant diseases as potential threats,
along with other biological or chemical agents.
Peter Chalk, an analyst for the Rand Corp., a Washington D.C. think
tank, testified before the Senate that food and agriculture have been neglected
by those dealing with terrorism.
“Not much attention has been paid to this critical sector,” he said. “It is vulnerable.”
The terrorism threat has renewed calls for a creation of a single food
safety agency to take over the work now conducted by the Food and Drug Administration,
the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency.
Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., has again introduced legislation that
would create a new superagency to oversee food safety and inspection. This time Durbin’s bill is getting more attention
because he is linking it to the terrorist threat.
However, others are opposed to a single agency but favor beefing up
the system with more money and staff.
(Article taken from THE PACKER, October 22,
2001)
![]()
As far as
the U.S. produce industry is concerned, Canada is showing all the flexibility
of a petrified tree trunk in talks over delaying an announced ban on products
shipped into Canada bearing the 5 a Day and U.S.-mandated nutritional information
labels.
The ban is scheduled to take effect Dec. 1 on all products shipped
from the U.S. into Canada. Leaders
in the produce industry are seeking to delay the ban until January 2003, saying
otherwise the industry could lose as much as $25 million.
As part of their quarterly bilateral trade talks, government representatives
from the U.S. and Canada met Oct. 4 n Ottawa to discuss the ban, which the
Canadian Food Inspection Agency announced in mid-September.
The talks produced little movement said Donna Denison, United Fresh
Fruit & Vegetable Association’s director of legislative affairs.
Ken Bruce, the CFIA’s national manager for the fresh section, said
Oct. 11 that the agency anticipated further talks.
Kraig Naasz, president of the U.S. Apple Association, said the issue
stems from a needless bureaucratic problem that is irrelevant to food safety.
“I thought our folks went up to Canada with a fair request, which was
to delay implementation and form a joint U.S.-Canadian task force to explore
options in this thing, and they had the door shut in their face,” said Naasz,
who noted that the U.S. apple industry ships 5 million cartons of product
year-round to Canada.
“It isn’t as though any Canadian consumer’s health is being put at
risk, were CFIA to delay implementation of this until January 2003. This is simply a bureaucratic problem.”
Leaders in the Canadian industry say they also support a delay on the
ban. However, some don’t share the pessimistic outlook
of their colleagues south of the border.
“We met with CFIA officials and explained that there will be a significant
impact if there isn’t an extension,” said Ron Lemaire, executive vice president
of the Canadian Produce Marketing Association.
“Everyone is looking for an extension.
The Canadian market is very unique in that we rely on over 70% of our
product as imports.”
Denison said the U.S. industry had supplied enough data to satisfy
the Canadian government.
“They are asking for additional information, more specifics on seasonality
and commodity groups impacted, which certainly leaves the door open for negotiation,”
she said. “But we feel we provided
sufficient information the last time.”
Nevertheless, the U.S. industry is working to comply with the requests
for additional information, Nassz said.
Industry leaders are hoping to set up a series of meetings with administration
officials, Denison added. Applying
some sort of pressure on the Canadian government is not yet an option, she
said.
“We have not gone there to that level yet,” she said. “However, we’re going to continue to push this issue and elevate
it, because in the end this is a very punitive action by Canada, and we’re
not going to let up on it.”
(Article taken from THE PACKER, October 15,
2001)
![]()
SCALD
This is a physiological disease of apples and has been a serious problem since the start of commercial storage and marketing. Scald primarily affects the skin of apples and is usually confined to the greener side. In most cases, it appears as superficial browning of the skin, but in severe cases the entire skin layer is killed and underlying tissue readily sloughs off. In some instances, the flesh becomes dead and brown and has the appearance of decay. Any amount of scald is considered serious damage.
![]()
APPLE SHIPMENT
TRACKING
Source: USDA
Amounts are
shown in units of 10,000 pounds
|
Season Begins |
10/07/01- 10/13/01
|
09/30/01- 10/06/01
|
10/08/00 10/14/00
|
Total this season 10/13/01
|
Total last season 10/14/00
|
|
SEPTEMBER
|
|||||
|
|
9,118 |
10,014 |
9,647 |
61,760 |
85,186 |
MID-WEEK F.O.B. PRICES AT MASSACHUSETTS COUNTRY SHIPPING POINT
Prices and grades received by telephone, October 30, 2001
There have
been requests for price quotes on organic apples. To date, there is no source for quotes.
|
VARIETY |
GRADE |
SIZE |
PRICE |
||
|
McINTOSH
|
Cartons Cell Pack U.S. Extra Fancy
|
80s |
19.00 |
||
|
96s |
18.50 |
||||
|
Cartons Film Bags U.S. Fancy |
12-3s 2-1/2” min |
12.50 |
|||
|
Cartons Tote Bags U.S. Fancy |
8-5s 2-1/2” min |
14.00 |
|||
|
CORTLAND |
Cartons Cell Pack U.S. Extra Fancy |
72s & 80s |
18.00 |
||
|
Cartons Film Bags U.S. Fancy |
12-3s 2-1/2” min |
12.50 |
|||
|
Cartons Tote Bags U.S. Fancy |
8-5s 2-1/2” min |
14.00 |
|||
|
EMPIRE |
Cartons Cell Pack U.S. Extra Fancy |
80s |
18.00 |
||
|
96s |
17.50 |
||||
|
Cartons Film Bags U.S. Fancy |
12-3s 2-1/2” min |
11.50 |
|||
|
Cartons Tote Bags U.S. Fancy |
8-5s 2-1/2” min |
13.00 |
|||
|
MACOUN |
Cartons Cell Pack U.S. Extra Fancy |
72s, 80s, 96s |
28.00 |
||
|
Cartons Film Bags U.S. Fancy |
12-3s 2-1/2” min |
13.00 |
|||
|
Cartons Tote Bags U.S. Fancy |
8-5s 2-1/2” min |
16.00 |
|||
|
FEDERAL
MARKET NEWS SERVICE, EVERETT, MASS. OCTOBER
29, 2001 MARKET
ABOUT STEADY
|
|||||
|
NEW ENGLAND
|
|
|
|
||
|
McINTOSH |
Cartons Cell Pack U.S. Extra Fancy |
80s & 100s |
20.00 |
||
|
Cartons Cell Pack U.S. No. 1 |
96s |
12.00 |
|||
|
100s |
10.00-11.00 |
||||
|
120s & 140s |
9.00- 9.50 |
||||
|
Cartons Film Bags U.S. No. 1 |
12-3s 2-3/8” min |
9.00- 9.50 |
|||
|
CORTLAND |
Carton Cell Pack U.S. Extra Fancy |
80s |
19.00 |
||
|
100s |
17.00 |
||||
|
Cartons Film Bags U.S. Extra Fancy |
12-3s 2-3/8” min |
12.00-13.00 |
|||
|
SHIPPED IN |
|||||
|
McINTOSH |
NY Hudson Valley Ctns CelPk U.S.ExFcy |
80s & 100s |
20.00 |
||
|
Lake Champlain Cartons CelPk U.S. ExFcy |
80s & 100s |
19.00 |
|||
|
120s |
16.00 |
||||
|
NY Hudson Valley Ctns CelPk U.S. Fcy |
100s |
9.00-10.00 |
|||
|
120s |
10.00-11.00 |
||||
|
140s |
9.00-10.00 |
||||
|
Lake Champlain Ctns CelPk U.S. Fcy |
120s |
10.00 |
|||
|
|
140s |
8.50 |
|||
|
Lake Champlain Ctn FlmBg U.S. ExFcy |
12-3s 2-1/2” min |
10.00-12.00 |
|||
|
CORTLAND |
NY Hudson Valley Ctns CelPk U.S. ExFcy |
56s & 64s |
15.00-17.00 |
||
|
80s |
18.00-20.00 |
||||
|
100s |
17.00-20.00 |
||||
|
Lake Champlain Ctns CelPk U.S. ExFcy |
80s |
19.00 |
|||
|
100s |
14.00 |
||||
|
Lake Champlain Ctn Film Bag U.S. ExFcy |
12-3s 2-1/2” min |
10.00-12.00 |
|||
|
MACOUN |
Lake Champlain Ctns CelPk U.S. ExFcy |
100s |
27.00-28.00 |
||
|
EMPIRE |
PA Cartons Tray Pack U.S. ExFcy |
88s |
19.00 |
||
|
100s |
17.50 |
||||
|
NY Hudson Valley Ctns CelPk U.S. Fcy |
80s |
19.00 |
|||
|
NY Hudson Valley Ctns CelPk U.S.ExFcy |
12-3s 2-1/2” min |
12.00 |
|||
|
RED DELICIOUS |
PA Cartons Tray Pack U.S. ExFcy |
100s |
16.00-17.00 |
||
|
WA Cartons Tray Pack WAExFcy
|
64s, 72s, 80s |
18.00 mostly 20.00-21.00 |
|||
|
88s |
|||||