Introduction

This document briefly explains what is meant by standardized parcel mapping, explains the unique parcel identifier that is part of the standardization, describes the advantages of adding this unique identifier to your CAMA database, who supports doing this, and what you have to do to implement this step in your community.

What does “standardized parcel mapping mean”?

Standardized parcel mapping refers to versions of each community’s assessor mapping that comply with the MassGIS Standard for Digital Parcels pdf format of Parstndrd_Ver2_0.pdf
.  Between January 2011 and summer 2013, mapping companies and regional planning agencies working for MassGIS produced this standardized mapping for each community except Boston.  The assistance provided by many assessors and municipal GIS staff on this project has been valuable and essential; the standardized data are available from the MassGIS web site.   Standardization includes requirements for the quality of parcel boundary mapping, for the content of a standard extract from the assessing database, and for the percentage of assessing CAMA records that link to a map parcel and vice-versa.  The standard also requires creating a unique identifier for each parcel on a community’s parcel map.

What is the parcel mapping standard’s unique identifier?

The standard’s unique identifier for a parcel is referred to as the “locational ID” (or “LOC_ID” for short); it is based on the location of a point inside each parcel in the standardized parcel mapping and is unique statewide.  The LOC_ID is not intended to replace existing map or CAMA record identifiers.  However, the LOC_ID does enable tighter and easier integration between your CAMA database and the standardized parcel mapping.  This integration is accomplished by incorporating the LOC_ID for each parcel directly into the corresponding tax listing(s) in the CAMA database.

Why is the LOC_ID needed in addition to the unique CAMA ID, the parcel ID, or the GIS ID?

  1. The LOC_ID, a form of “GIS ID”, enables tighter and easier integration between your CAMA records and their corresponding parcels.  Trying to link records based on the map parcel ID information in a CAMA database extract is very inefficient since the parcel IDs are typically stored in several fields (i.e. map, block, lot, etc.).  When that map ID information is exported in a CAMA extract, it must be merged together to create one unique parcel ID that matches the same information on the map (for example, the map parcel ID must look like 12_02_2A in both the CAMA extract and on the map – you cannot have 12-02-2A on one side and 12_02_2A on the other); setting up this match is time consuming and has to be repeated every time you want to link the CAMA extract to the parcel map.
  2. You could attach the CAMA ID (Vision “PID”, Patriot “Account #”, CSC “Link ID”, PK-Systems “Key”, etc.) to each parcel.  However, the CAMA ID is unique for every CAMA record.  So when you have more than one CAMA record associated with a parcel (for example, condominiums), you have to create some sort of work-around so that the mapping software can link all the condos on one parcel to that parcel.  In the standardized parcels, this has been taken care of because the CAMA_ID for each condo on a single parcel will have been paired with the same LOC_ID.  Note that this problem also exists with map/block/lot information as condo records in a CAMA database will each have a sub-lot number, but the map parcel ID only goes to the level of the lot number.
  3. The LOC_ID also solves the problem that neither the map parcel ID nor the CAMA ID are unique outside of any given community. Say, for example, a regional planning agency was asked to map neighborhood codes across multiple communities; they would receive a CAMA extract file from each community.  Even if every parcel was tagged with the correct map parcel ID or CAMA_ID, the agency would not be able to reliably link the file from any one community to the regional parcel map because the CAMA IDs could match in multiple communities.  Thus at a regional or state level, a unique way of identifying a single parcel or CAMA record is necessary. 
  4. Finally, LOC_IDs lower software application costs because consultants don’t have to modify their GIS applications to use some other identifier for linking your CAMA records with the assessor’s parcel map.

Who supports using the LOC_ID?   See Status map of LOC_ID use pdf format of Status of Maintaining LOC_ID

Because the LOC_ID is an easier way of linking CAMA records with parcel mapping, it is supported by all the main parcel map maintenance and GIS consultants working in Massachusetts (Tighe and Bond, James W. Sewall Company, PeopleGIS, Polaris Consultants, MainStreet GIS, CGIS Mapping, CDM Smith, Cartographic Associates (now CAI Technologies), and Applied Geographics); it is also supported by all of the regional planning agencies that provide parcel map maintenance services; other GIS consultants likely also support use of the LOC_ID. 

In September of 2014, the MAAO endorsed as best practice pdf format of MAAO Endorses Standardized Tax Mapping
, the use of the MassGIS Parcel Standard.

How do I get the LOC_ID added to my CAMA database?

Having the LOC_ID added to your CAMA database is a step typically completed by your CAMA software vendor (some communities have staff with this type of expertise).  An assessor initiates this step by contacting MassGIS for a crosswalk file that you will then provide to your CAMA vendor. (contact Neil MacGaffey or Paul Nutting).  The file from MassGIS links LOC_IDs with the corresponding CAMA database unique ID (e.g., Patriot “AccountNo”, Vision “PID”, PK-Systems “key”, CSC “Link ID”, etc.).  The CAMA provider then uses that file to update the CAMA database, with the LOC_ID typically being put into an existing “GIS ID” field in the database (in the CSC CAMA an obsolete field is being re-purposed). 

Once they are in the CAMA database, how do I keep LOC_IDs up-to-date?

LOC_IDs for new or reconfigured lots are created by whoever maintains your standardized mapping.  So, if you are requiring that your maps be maintained to comply with Level 3 of the current MassGIS standard, whomever maintains your maps needs to provide you with new LOC_IDs for new or changed lots.  This is probably best done by having them provide a spreadsheet with map/block/lot information in one column and the corresponding LOC_ID in another column.  The tax record can be found in the CAMA system based on map/block/lot information and the new LOC_ID can then simply be copied and pasted into the appropriate location in your CAMA system user screen.  Here’s how to find the location for entering new LOC_IDs in the four most commonly used CAMA systems:

Patriot

    1. From the main record card information for a parcel, click on the parcel ID, which should open three additional tabs: "Current Owner", "Prior Owner" and "ID/Factors/Taxes"
    2. On the ID/FactorsTaxes tab, the LOC_ID is in the lower left; it is editable.  If you see a GISLINK instead of the LOC_ID field, then LOC_IDs have not yet been added to your database.
                                                                                                                                           

CSC

The LOC_ID is being stored in a seldom-used legacy field called Own Acct.  It’s in the Parcel record – see below.  “Owner Account” was an account ID used years ago in the original tax collection system and is no longer used.  Assessors can enter data in that field themselves, whether for new or existing accounts. 

Image of the CSC data input GUI

Vision

Go to the Supplemental Data screen and look for the GIS_ID field toward the bottom.

PK-Systems

When updated mapping is provided to PK (usually annually), it should be accompanied by a list of new/changed parcel map/lot numbers and their corresponding LOC_IDs.  PK will load that info to the database.



Last Updated 10/10/2014