- Accomplishments & Initiatives
- American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
- Development of the FY13-17 Capital Investment Plan
- Affordability & Fiscal Responsibility
- Impact of Capital Budget on the Operating Budget
- Aggregate FY13-17 Capital Investment Plan
- Capital Investments by Investment Category
- Appendix A - Debt Affordability Analysis
- Appendix B - Bond Bills
- Appendix C - Project Listing (pdf)
- Appendix D - Project Descriptions (pdf)
- Plan by Investment
- Plan by Capital Agency
- Plan by Beneficiary Agency
Affordability and Fiscal Responsibility
Because the capital program is funded primarily through bond proceeds, the total size of the capital program is determined primarily by the amount of debt the Commonwealth can afford to issue. Annually, the Executive Office for Administration and Finance (A&F) has established what is known as the “bond cap” as an administrative guideline for annual bond issuance in support of the capital program. For the sixth consecutive year, the Patrick-Murray Administration engaged in a rigorous analysis of the state’s outstanding debt to determine the affordable level of bond issuance. Based on this analysis, the Administration has established the FY13 at $1.875 billion, $2.0 billion for FY14, and $2.125 billion for FY15 and beyond. A complete description of the Administration’s debt affordability analysis and policy is attached as Appendix A.
For purposes of its analysis of existing payment obligations, A&F takes into account not only debt service on general obligation bonds, but also debt service on certain special obligations, contract assistance obligations and certain capital lease payments. Although the Accelerated Bridge Program is being carried out in addition to the regular capital program in order to achieve savings from avoided cost inflation and deferred maintenance and to achieve the other objectives of the program, the debt service resulting from the bridge program is also taken into account within the 8% limit under the debt affordability analysis. (See description of the Accelerated Bridge Program, below.)
A&F also takes a conservative approach to projecting future budgeted revenues, basing its growth estimate on the lesser of 3% or the actual compound annual growth rate of the Commonwealth’s revenues over the last ten years – which included both economic booms and downturns. A&F models future debt issuance using fiscally conservative assumptions about interest rates, maturities, dates of issuance and market conditions.
Based on this analytic approach, A&F has projected the Commonwealth will have the capacity to accommodate steady increases in the bond cap over the next three years – albeit at lower base levels than planned prior to the recession – while maintaining the percentage of the Commonwealth’s budgeted revenues needed to pay debt service during that period comfortably below 8%.
The Patrick-Murray Administration intends to limit the total amount of virtually all future bond-funded capital projects to the bond cap. As described in Appendix A, however, there are certain, limited circumstances in which the Administration plans to undertake borrowing outside the bond cap when there is a sound policy justification for doing so. For example, there are certain projects for which a dedicated stream of new, project-related revenues or savings can be identified to support debt service costs related to those projects.
The debt affordability analysis methodology is based on the Commonwealth’s current available financing resources and mechanisms; changes in financing structures and resources in the future may impact how A&F examines the administrative bond cap and the state’s capacity for additional borrowing. The Administration plans to revisit the debt capacity and affordability analysis every year, revising its estimates for future years by taking into account fluctuations in interest rates, budgeted revenues and other changes impacting the Commonwealth’s debt capacity. In addition, the Administration will annually assess the appropriateness of the methodology and constraints for establishing the bond cap described above.
top of page