The Massachusetts Court System
SEARCH
The Massachusetts Court System
Images of Massachusetts Courthouses
About Us
Welcome
Introduction
Administrative Office of the Trial Court
Judges
Courts
Resources
Self Help Center
Site Index
Contact Us
Home
Home > About Us > Administrative Office of the Trial Court > Court Capital Projects

Frequently Asked Questions
Court Capital Projects

 

What is the purpose of the Master Plan?

The Master Plan for the Improvement of Court Facilities establishes a process of collaborative analysis, planning, and review to ensure fair and objective selection and implementation of capital improvements to meet the capital needs of the Massachusetts court system.





What is the process for setting priorities for major projects?


In 1997, an independent Architectural/Engineering consultant carried out a comprehensive survey of court facilities (The Building Conditions Survey) under the direction of the Division of Capital Asset Management. The information obtained through the survey and subsequent updating has been used to identify relative needs for capital improvements and repairs for courthouses across the Commonwealth, regardless of ownership.

Relative sizes of caseload and the degree of overcrowding at each facility were ranked.

Qualitative criteria were added to account for such factors as regional significance, historical value, and potential to replace private leases.

All of these criteria were combined to develop a ranked list of major capital needs, divided into categories of top, high and average priority. The purpose of this ranking is to guide the selection of court facilities for major renovation, replacement and repairs under the 1998 courthouse bond authorization.





What is the process for setting priorities for repair projects?

Initial priorities for repair of facilities were developed utilizing information from the Building Conditions Survey. A process for analysis and identification of specific repair projects has begun. The most severe problems of life safety, security, and accessibility will be addressed first.




What are the Periodic Reviews?

Under the master plan, the leaders of the Supreme Judicial Court, the Administrative Office of the Trial Court, and the Division of Capital Asset Management will meet regularly to monitor progress and track expenditure for both major and repair projects. As new information is obtained or conditions change, this group will re-assess priorities. The criteria for setting priorities are established in this master plan, but the relative ranking of facilities may be adjusted as needed to account for changes that occur over time.





What is the recommended schedule?

The recommended schedule of major projects and repairs is represented in the Division of Capital Asset Management's annual Five-year Capital Spending Plan.



 

 

Administrative Office of the Trial Court Web Site Disclaimer
Copyright© 2004 Administrative Office of the Trial Court
 
Comments, Questions or Suggestions? Email the Webmaster

Last Updated on May 24, 2004 9:08 AM