The Massachusetts Court System
SEARCH  
The Massachusetts Court System
Images of Massachusetts Courthouses
About Us
Courts
Resources
Attorney Referral
Education Resource Center
Forms
Guidelines and Standards
Juror Information
Law Libraries
Legal Research
Opinions
Press Releases
Probation
Self Help Center
Site Index
Contact Us
Home
Home > Resources > Guidelines and Standards

Introduction
Sentencing Guidelines


Introduction

The Massachusetts Sentencing Commission was established in 1994 by the truth in sentencing law as a response to the escalating concern for sentencing reform. The goal of the commission is to promote truth in sentencing by developing uniform sentencing guidelines, including guidelines for the appropriate use of intermediate sanctions.

On April 11, 1996, the commission submitted its Report to the General Court, culminating an intense two-year effort of research, debate, and deliberations. The result is a comprehensive and balanced set of guidelines that will provide greater uniformity and certainty in sentencing so that victims and offenders alike will understand the meaning and effect of the sentence imposed. The guidelines will promote fairness and reduce disparity while preserving that degree of judicial discretion necessary to fashion the sentence appropriate for the individual offender and the specific offense.

The Report to the General Court, which was unanimously adopted by commission members, presents the philosophical and policy bases for the guidelines. The recommendations of the Report have been incorporated into the sentencing guidelines legislation, which is presently before the Legislature. If passed, the policies and procedures contained in this Sentencing Guide would become effective. Until then, they should be considered proposed policies and procedures.

The purpose of this document is to provide a practical guide for the application of the guidelines in sentencing a convicted defendant. Ten specific steps are set forth and a set of attachments is included for reference. The objective is to give "hands-on" directions for making the sentencing guidelines operational. The audience is intended to be judges, prosecutors, defense counsel, probation personnel, and others concerned with the practical application of the sentencing guidelines.


1. Offense Seriousness

1
Determining the offense seriousness level of each current conviction by referring to the Master Crime List.
 
The Master Crime List contains over 1,800 offenses, each ranked and placed into one of nine levels of seriousness. To determine the offense seriousness level of a particular crime, locate the offense on the Master Crime List using either the offense name (offense) or General Law reference (offense reference). The offense seriousness level is indicated to the left of each entry.
 
Where multiple offense convictions result from the same criminal conduct, the most serious offense according to the rankings in the Master Crime List should be treated as the governing offense for determining the base sentence.
 
Considerations

  • Staircasing
  • Some crimes broadly defined to encompass a wide range of behavior were staircased (i.e., placed at more than one level on the sentencing guidelines grid) based on a specified factor. These offenses are identified by a notation on the Master Crime List. When offenses are staircased, determine the appropriate level by taking into account:

    • the value of property lost (e.g., Larceny); or
    • the degree of injury to victim (e.g., Assault and Battery with a Dangerous Weapon); or
    • the display of a gun (e.g., Armed Robbery); or
    • dwelling versus non-dwelling (e.g., Breaking and Entering).
     
    illustration 1: An Assault and Battery with a Dangerous Weapon resulting in no or minor injury has been placed at offense seriousness level 3; resulting in moderate injury at offense seriousness level 4; and resulting in significant injury at offense seriousness level 6. Degree of injury is defined in Attachment A.  
     
  •  Ranking Misdemeanors
  • If a misdemeanor does not appear on the Master Crime List its offense seriousness level may be determined by its maximum sentence by statute, such that:

    • Level 2: Maximum statutory penalty of incarceration for more than 6 months up to and including 2 1/2 years.
    • Level 1: Maximum statutory penalty of incarceration for 6 months or less.

  •  Second and Subsequent Convictions
  • There are certain offenses for which the statute sets forth a more severe penalty upon a second or subsequent conviction (e.g., Assault to Rape). In these cases the offense has been elevated one level on the offense seriousness scale.
     

    Illustration 2: The offense of Assault to Rape has been placed at offense seriousness level 6. The offense of Assault to Rape - Subsequent Offense has been placed at offense seriousness level 7

     
     
    Where the offense is already at Level 8 (e.g., Home Invasion) and could not be elevated one level, the guidelines call for the offender to be moved over one cell to the right.

  •  Offenses Punishable By Fine Only 
  • The guidelines do not apply to offenses punishable only by a fine (e.g., failure to report hazing). For purposes of criminal history, these offenses have been assigned to offense seriousness level 1.
     
    Attachments
     

     

    Continue to Step 2

     


     

     

    Administrative Office of the Trial Court Web Site Disclaimer
    Copyright ©2005 Administrative Office of the Trial Court
     
     Comments, Questions or Suggestions? Email the Webmaster
     
    Last Updated on October 30, 2006 1:53 PM