Opinion 97-5
Serving as unpaid member of Town Zoning Board of Appeals; Southeastern Regional Transit Authority Advisory Board; representative of Town and Secretary of Southeastern Transit Authority Pension Fund; serving as trustee of two nominee trusts; conservator an
May 29, 1997
Opinion 97-5
Dear:
This
is in response to your letter of March 5, 1997. In your letter, you
state that you were recently appointed an Assistant Clerk-Magistrate
in the Court, and you seek the Committee's advice on a number of
questions relating to your continuing to hold various positions which
you held while you were practicing law.
The
first question you pose concerns your serving as an unpaid member of the Town
of Zoning Board of Appeals. You state that the Town of is not within the jurisdiction
of the First District Court of and that you do not believe any matters involving
the Board of Appeals would come before you as an Assistant Clerk-Magistrate.
The Code would permit you to continue to hold this position as long as you comply
with Canon 5(C)(1). This Canon states that a Clerk-Magistrate shall not conduct
outside business activities in the Courthouse at any time, nor shall a Clerk-Magistrate
conduct any outside business activities anywhere during normal court hours. In
other words, you must make sure to devote the entire time during normal court
hours to the duties of your office.
Your
second question concerns your serving as an unpaid member of the Southeastern
Regional Transit Authority Advisory Board, as the representative from the Town
of , and serving as an unpaid member and Secretary of the Southeastern Regional
Transit Authority Pension Fund. You state there are no member communities of
the Authority that are within the jurisdiction of the Court. The Committee believes
that you may continue to serve on these Boards with the same caveat; you must
not perform services related to these Boards in the Courthouse at any time; nor
may you perform any services for these Boards during normal court hours.
The
next four questions all involve your serving in fiduciary capacities, including
acting as trustee of two nominee trusts, as a conservator and as an executor.
You describe your relationships with the persons for whom you are serving in
a fiduciary capacity as follows.
In
the case of one of the nominee trusts, you state that the beneficiary is a close
friend with whom you have socialized and gone on vacations. Your long friendship
included your acting as campaign manager for this individual. Your relationship
with the beneficiary of the second nominee trust is that he is a former client
with whom you have socialized and attended many family functions. In your role
as conservator, you note that for the past two years, you have seen your elderly
ward at least once each week, and usually two or three times per week. You take
care of her bills, medical insurance and food since she appears to have no heirs.
You indicate that she trusts you and feel that she would have difficulty accepting
another individual in this role. Finally, in the matter in which you serve as
executor, you note that you went on vacations with the decedent, dined with him
and had other family interactions over a 25 year span.
None
of your relationships with those for whom you are acting in a fiduciary capacity
are familial in nature as that term is defined in the Code. See
Opinions Nos. 91-1, 95-3. Canon 5(D) addresses the subject of fiduciary
activities and, with the exception of the grandfathering provision discussed
below, prohibits Clerk-Magistrates from serving as fiduciaries except where such
service is for a family member as defined in the Code. The grandfathering provision
of Canon 5(D)(2) provides as follows: "A Clerk-Magistrate may serve as an executor,
administrator, trustee, guardian, or other fiduciary for the estate, trust or
person of one who is not a member of his or her family provided that the Clerk-Magistrate
was acting in the fiduciary position prior to April 1, 1990."
Based
on the facts you have stated in your letter, your appointments as conservator
and executor do not fall within this grandfathering provision since you began
serving in both these positions after April 1, 1990. Under the Code, you may
no longer serve in these roles. As to your serving as trustee of the nominee
trusts, unless your appointments as trustee were made prior to April 1, 1990,
you must resign from these positions also.
Finally,
you ask if you may continue serving as an escrow agent in a Superior Court action
on behalf of a "client". It is worth noting that the minute you took the position
as an Assistant Clerk-Magistrate, you no longer had any clients since Canon 3
specifically prohibits the practice of law. The facts you provide indicate that
your former client has had difficulty paying his bills. As the escrow agent,
you have taken the rental payments due to the "client" and paid bills such as
electric, gas, water, sewer and insurance. The mortgage company no longer permits
your former client to keep rental monies. You state that the court case is in
Court and you would expect no action in the Court. It is the opinion of the Committee
that your activities as escrow agent for the "client" involve the practice of
law and are prohibited by the Code.
We
note that your letter to the Committee was submitted on letterhead which identifies
you as an "attorney at law". Since under Canon 3 of the Code, Clerk-Magistrates
are expressly prohibited from engaging in the practice of law, you should no
longer use this stationery.