The
contents of voluminous writings or records which cannot conveniently be
examined in court may be presented in the form of a summary, chart, or the
like, which accurately reflects the contents of the underlying documents. The
originals, or duplicates, may be made
available for examination or copying, or both, by other parties at a reasonable
time and place. The court may order that they be produced in court.
NOTE
This section is derived from Commonwealth v.
Greenberg, 339 Mass. 557, 581–582, 160 N.E.2d 181, 197 (1959), and
the cases cited in Section 611(a), Manner and Order of Interrogation and
Presentation: Control by Court.
“[I]n a trial embracing so many details and occupying so
great a length of time . . . during which a great mass of
books and documents were put in evidence, concise statements of their content
verified by persons who had prepared them from the originals were the only
means for presenting to the jury an intelligible view of the issues involved” (quotation
and citations omitted).
Id. at 582,
160 N.E.2d at 197.
“[C]are must be taken to insure that
summaries accurately reflect the contents of the underlying documents and do
not function as pedagogical devices that unfairly emphasize part of the
proponent’s proof” (quotations and citations omitted). Welch v. Keene Corp.,
31 Mass. App. Ct. 157, 165–166, 575 N.E.2d 766, 771 (1991). The witness
presenting the summary is not permitted to state deductions or inferences, but
may testify as to the results of his or her computations. Commonwealth v.
Greenberg, 339 Mass. at 582, 160 N.E.2d at 197. The court may order that
the original be produced. Cf. Cornell-Andrews Smelting Co. v. Boston
& P.R. Corp., 215 Mass. 381, 390–391, 102 N.E. 625, 628 (1913).