[Privilege not recognized]
NOTE
In Gossman v.
Rosenberg, 237 Mass. 122, 124, 129 N.E. 424, 425–426 (1921), the Supreme
Judicial Court held that a witness could not claim a privilege as to trade
secrets. Cf. Proposed Mass. R. Evid. 507. However,
public access to information about trade secrets in a public agency’s
possession may be limited. See G. L. c. 4, § 7,
Twenty-sixth (g) (excluding from the definition of “public records” any “trade
secrets or commercial or financial information voluntarily provided to an
agency for use in developing governmental policy and upon a promise of
confidentiality”). The confidentiality of trade secrets also may be maintained
by means of a protective order whereby a court may protect from disclosure
during discovery “a trade secret or other confidential research, development,
or commercial information.” Mass. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(7). See also Mass. R.
Crim. P. 14(a)(5). The court may issue such a protective order on
motion by a party or by the person from whom discovery is sought and if good
cause is shown. Mass. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(7).