| |
This page provides detailed information on a single example wetland restoration project that can help people better understand the details of project development and implementation. The focus project will be changed periodically in order to provide a range of examples.
Current Focus Project: Bridge Creek, Barnstable
The Bridge Creek restoration project is not a typical wetlands restoration venture (much to the relief of WRP project managers). This is because the project proved to be extraordinarily complex and challenging for all the partners involved. However, the environmental and social benefits that will result are substantial, and the exceptional collaboration and perseverance it has fostered make it a superb example of what is required to succeed in a restoration effort. |
|
Click here to
view the Bridge Creek Phase I Project
Slide Show.
|
|
Background
Located in the Town of Barnstable within the state-designated Sandy Neck/Barnstable Harbor Area of Critical Environmental Concern, the Bridge Creek project site consists of 40 acres of coastal wetlands that were altered long ago by the creation of two separate tidal restrictions. Well over a century ago, Route 6A and an adjacent railroad line were both built across Bridge Creek. The original culverts that conveyed the creek beneath the road and rail line were both undersized and failed to pass the full tidal range into upstream wetlands. The combined effect of these two crossings effectively cut off tidal flows from most of the upstream marsh and, over time, severely degraded the entire upstream aquatic system.

In 1996, the Army Corps of Engineers prepared a “Cape Cod Wetlands Investigation” on behalf of WRP, to identify and evaluate significant opportunities for salt marsh restoration. The Bridge Creek salt marsh was one of six priority sites selected for further evaluation of restoration potential. The investigation prompted WRP, local officials, and other restoration advocates to examine the feasibility of restoring this site. Initial assessments concluded that replacing the culvert under the active rail line was impractical due to the rail service disruptions and associated costs that would be required.
Then, in the Fall of 2001, a unique window
of opportunity appeared in the form of a one-month repair
closure of the railroad line scheduled for March
of 2003. This provided only eighteen months to prepare Phase
I of the project for construction – a very short
development time for a project of this complexity. The short
lead time combined with a narrow and inflexible construction
window set the stage for one of the most challenging restoration
projects ever undertaken in Massachusetts.
Undaunted, the Town of Barnstable and WRP quickly swung into action, and Phase I was completed in the Spring of 2003. Old culvert view.
In order to realize the full restoration potential of 40 acres, project partners then turned their attention to Phase II: replacement of the remaining undersized culvert beneath Route 6A. This second phase of restoration required additional coordination above and beyond the tremendous partnerships developed for Phase I. Ultimately, over 38 groups and 84 individual partners joined together to see the project through to completion. In May of 2005, the new Route 6A culvert was installed, returning the full tidal range to the marsh for the first time in over 100 years. Old culvert view.
The Project
Restoration of the Bridge Creek salt marsh required the replacement of two culverts beneath Route 6A and the adjacent rail line. Phase I installed a new 10x10 foot concrete box culvert beneath the rail bed. Phase II replaced the Rt. 6A culvert with a second 10x10 foot culvert.
Right from the start, WRP and Barnstable officials realized that this project would require tremendous collaboration and support from a large group of partners and immediately began forming the project team. In the end, 38 different partner groups contributed to both phases of this project, including the Town of Barnstable, 5 federal agencies, 8 state agencies, 10 corporate partners, 6 non-profit organizations, and 8 private individuals or groups (see table of project contributors at the end of this page). In all, over $1.5 million dollars worth of funding and services was raised to complete this project.
The following list highlights the major project activities:
- Base-line monitoring of existing site conditions
- Field survey and hydrologic modeling
- Habitat evaluation and assessment of predicted habitat conversions
- Preparation of restoration design plans, specifications, and construction methodology
- Applications for 22 different design and construction grants
- Completion of 11 different applications for federal, state, and local permits and authorizations
- Deed research and modification of wetland
restriction orders
- Community outreach and negotiations with landowners and abutters
- Organization and attendance of numerous public meetings and site visits
- Development of detailed construction bid package, review of bids, and selection of contractors
- Construction monitoring and oversight
- Post-construction monitoring and reporting
- Ongoing coordination of all partners
and contractors during the 3.5-year project period
The overall goal of this project is to increase natural tidal flows to the upstream degraded wetlands (see image below).
Replacement of the culverts has restored the dynamic tidal hydrology and water chemistry needed to bring back healthy salt marsh habitats and functions, along with the fish and wildlife they support. Phase I of the project restored tidal flow to 24 acres of salt marsh. Click here to view a hydrograph showing pre- and post-construction tidal ranges measured at the site.
Phase II restored tidal flow to an additional 16 acres for a total of 40 acres under restoration.

A detailed monitoring program has been developed for the site. Pre-construction data for hydrology, vegetation, fish usage, and water chemistry will be compared to post-construction data that will be collected for at least 3 years after the project is complete. WRP will collaborate with the MA Division of Marine Fisheries, a private corporate donor, and dedicated volunteers through the Association to Preserve Cape Cod to collect and analyze the data. Changes to wetland conditions will be documented and evaluated in relation to project goals. If necessary, measures will be taken to address deviations of results from restoration goals.
Selected Examples of Challenges Faced
Many challenges (both expected and unexpected)
had to be overcome for this project. Below are several illustrative examples.
Phase I
- Narrow eighteen-month development timeline and
a one-month
construction window with no flexibility
- Unanticipated design
changes resulting from the need to install
a sheet-pile coffer dam that increased costs
and narrowed the construction window
- Timeline sequencing issues with securing grant funding,
obtaining
permits, complying with contract deadlines and initiating
major supply orders
(such as casting of the concrete culvert sections)
Phase II
- Coordination of three different utility companies to
re-locate utility lines for culvert installation (overhead
lines had to be temporarily moved to provide room for a
crane to swing culvert sections into place)
- Closure of a major state road
(Route 6A) to reduce construction time/costs while
taking into consideration impacts on local business,
seasonal traffic patterns, and potential
loss of detour routes due to other planned road work
- Continuing need to raise funds and identify non-federal
match to
help leverage major federal funding opportunities
- Completion of construction and breakdown of detour prior to beginning of high-traffic season on the Cape starting with 2005 Memorial Day Weekend
Summary
With construction complete, the Bridge Creek project exemplifies what can be achieved in the face of adversity when project partners pull together to overcome major challenges. Even when the situation seemed dire and success uncertain, partners persevered and went the extra mile to ensure that project goals would be accomplished. Of all the lessons learned throughout this restoration effort, the most profound is the power and importance of partnerships for achieving project success.
Table of Project Contributors
Cooperator/Supporter/Contributor |
Task(s) and/or Contribution(s) to Project |
Town of Barnstable |
Provided local project sponsorship, project management, survey assistance, on-site construction management, and management of grants and construction contracting through the Department of Public Works and Conservation Division. |
Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management - Wetlands Restoration Program and Executive Office of Environmental Affairs
|
Project management and coordination, including outreach and education; hired contractor to design project; awarded the Town of Barnstable a major grant toward project construction; assisted with project permitting and interagency coordination; coordinate and participate in pre- and post-construction monitoring. |
Massachusetts Bays National Estuary Program / Cape Cod Commission
|
Prepared coastal tidal atlas identifying the Bridge Creek Salt Marsh Restoration Project. |
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection |
Provided agency coordination and assistance with Wetland Restriction Orders. |
Massachusetts Watershed Initiative |
Provided project funding grant for Phase I. |
Massachusetts Highway Department |
Project coordination, permit review, and maintenance and ownership of Route 6A culvert. |
Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation |
Project coordination, permit review, and maintenance and ownership of railroad culvert. |
Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation |
Partnered with Town to purchase adjacent land and obtain major Phase II Grant funds through USFWS grant. |
Massachusetts Corporate Wetlands Restoration Partnership |
In-kind Services: Prepared and obtained all required environmental permits (Earth Tech); assisted with development of monitoring plan and participated in pre- and post-construction monitoring (Earth Tech); conducted Geotechnical investigations (Weston and Sampson); provided flag-man (Bay Colony Railroad).
|
Monetary Donations: Contributed funding toward project construction (The Gillette Company, Battelle, KeySpan Foundation, Capaccio Environmental Engineering, Cape Cod Cooperative Bank, Duke Energy, and N-Star). |
Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries |
Pre- and post-construction fish monitoring. |
US Department of Agriculture / NRCS |
Provided project funding for Phase I and Phase II, as well as technical review. |
NOAA Restoration Center |
Provided partnership funding contributions towards Phase I and Phase II; provided technical expertise. |
Ducks Unlimited / NOAA Community Restoration Partnership |
Contributed project funding for Phase I. |
Gulf of Maine Council - NOAA / NMFS Partnership |
Contributed project funding for Phase I. |
Conservation Law Foundation / NOAA Community Restoration Partnership |
Contributed project funding for Phase I and Phase II. |
The Nature Conservancy |
Provided project funding for Phase II and additional funding through TNC / NOAA Partnership Grant; partnered with Town to obtain USFWS Grant for Phase II. |
US Fish and Wildlife Service |
Contributed project funding for Phase I and Phase II. |
US Army Corps of Engineers |
Prepared initial priority identification and assessment of the Bridge Creek Salt Marsh Restoration Project; notified partners of railroad shutdown in 2001. |
US Environmental Protection Agency |
Provided environmental and technical review. |
Association to Preserve Cape Cod |
Coordinated volunteer monitoring efforts. |
Barnstable Land Trust |
Provided staging area / construction easement for Phases I & II. |
Bay Colony Railroad |
Provided Flag-person / safety personnel for work and access on active Railroad. |
Cape Cod Central Railroad |
Provided groundbreaking event venue and train ride, and distributed education material. |
Lawrence Lynch Corp. |
Contractor for Phase I construction. |
Northern Construction Service, LLC |
Contractor for Phase II construction. |
The Louis Berger Group, Inc. |
Consultant for design and construction oversight for Phase I and Phase II. |
Utilities |
Verizon, Comcast Cable, and N-Star: provided coordination and relocation of utilities during construction. |
Private Citizens |
Provided right-to-access for construction. |
|
|