The formation of the Rattlesnake Review Group is a response to a promise made to legislators by the EEA and DFG at a legislative oversight hearing in 2016, to conduct a review of the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife’s (MassWildlife's) Rattlesnake Conservation Plan. The Rattlesnake Review Group’s purpose is to: 1) ask citizens to identify issues and concerns that may not have been adequately covered in previous public meetings, and 2) identify scientific information on rattlesnakes that may not have been considered in the current Plan. After a thorough examination of all the information, the Rattlesnake Review Group will make a recommendation about the Rattlesnake Conservation Plan to the Fisheries and Wildlife Board.
The membership of the Review Group, operating under the purview of the state Fisheries and Wildlife Board, includes Quabbin area residents with ties to local municipalities and conservation organizations, local state legislators, the DFG and DCR Commissioners, and the Director of MassWildlife. A Science Advisory Group composed of scientists from UMass Amherst, Berkshire Community College, Roger Williams Zoo in Rhode Island, and the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife will assist the Review Group as needed.
Rattlesnake Review Working Group Members
- Chair: Dr. Joseph Larson, Chairman Fisheries and Wildlife Board; Member Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Advisory Committee; Professor Emeritus, Environmental Conservation-UMass Amherst, Quabbin area resident
- George Peterson, Commissioner, Dept of Fish and Game (or designee)
- Leo Roy, Commissioner, Dept of Conservation and Recreation (or designee)
- Jack Buckley, Director, MassWildlife (or designee)
- Anne Gobi, State Senator, Spencer (or designee)
- Eric Lesser, State Senator, 1st Hampden and Hampshire (or designee)
- Susannah Whipps, State Representative, 2nd Franklin (or designee)
- Dan Hammock, Quabbin Fishermen’s Association
- Tony Brighenti, N. Quabbin Fishermen’s Association; Quabbin Watershed Advisory Committee (QWAC)
- Nancy Talbot, Selectperson and Town Clerk, Ware
- Bill Barnett, Selectperson, Belchertown
- David Small, Athol Bird and Nature Club
- Dr. Alan Richmond, Dept of Biology, UMass Amherst
- Dr. Mike Jones, State Herpetologist, MassWildlife
Science Advisory Group
- Dr. Tom French. Assistant Director, MassWildlife's Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program
- Lou Perrotti, Conservation Director, Roger William Zoo; head-starting project snakes
- Tom Tyning, Professor, Berkshire Community College
- Anne Stengle, PhD Candidate, University of Massachusetts Amherst
March 22, 2017: Knights of Columbus, Ware
February 28, 2017: Belchertown Town Hall
January 30, 2017: Athol Town Hall
Public Comments & Questions
Massachusetts Rattlesnake Conservation: Executive Summary
The conservation of Massachusetts’ native fauna and flora is the statutory responsibility of the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife (MassWildlife). MassWildlife’s specific charge is the stewardship of all wild amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals, and freshwater and diadromous fishes in the Commonwealth, as well as endangered wildlife including native wild plants and invertebrates.
Statewide Status of the Timber Rattlesnake
The Timber Rattlesnake (Crotalus horridus) is a native species to all six New England states, having colonized from the south as far as the White Mountains and Lake Champlain during a warm period following the glacial retreat. In Massachusetts, the Timber Rattlesnake was formerly widespread and locally abundant in Essex, Middlesex, Worcester, Suffolk, Norfolk, Franklin, Hampshire, Hampden, and Berkshire Counties until the late-19th century. Today the Timber Rattlesnake is one of the most endangered species in Massachusetts, having sustained the largest decline of any native reptile species in the past 150 years. Geographic place names, town histories, historical scientific reports, and museum specimens demonstrate a clear pattern of rapid, statewide range contraction from the mid-1800s to the early 1900s. During the early colonial period, the Timber Rattlesnake evidently was widespread on many mountainous areas of bedrock exposure, absent only from Cape Cod and the Islands and the highest elevations of the Worcester and Berkshire Plateaus. Timber Rattlesnake populations across Massachusetts had mostly collapsed by the late-19th century as a combined result of widespread deforestation and eradication efforts, the latter supported by a bounty system. During the same time, the Timber Rattlesnake disappeared from Maine and Rhode Island and was reduced to a single site in New Hampshire and two sites in Vermont. At least two Massachusetts populations were extirpated in the past 50 years. There are only five remaining populations in Massachusetts, at least two of which are at very high risk of imminent extirpation caused by a combination a diverse array of factors and threats, which have proven extremely difficult to alleviate, and the conservation outlook for these populations is extremely dire. Timber Rattlesnakes have been a species of conservation concern for over 40 years and are protected in Massachusetts through the Massachusetts Endangered Species Act (MESA) since 1990.
Threats to Remaining Rattlesnake Populations
Threats to Timber Rattlesnakes within existing sites in Massachusetts vary in significance among the five remaining populations. Major threats include vehicle mortality caused by automobiles and ATVs; incidental and purposeful killing; harassment by curiosity seekers; collection by poachers; increased use of new and unsanctioned trails and of certain vistas. Rattlesnakes populations are further threatened by natural sources of mortality and an emerging, episodic fungal pathogen.
Statewide Conservation Strategy for Rattlesnakes
To directly address known threats and to ensure the persistence of the remaining populations, MassWildlife continues to work intensively with key partners—including the Department of Conservation and Recreation, Department of Transportation, Environmental Police, land trusts, private landowners, and scientists—to identify the most critical threats and to prioritize and implement the most necessary and urgent conservation actions. Regional and site-specific partners meet regularly to prioritize actions and assess progress toward goals. Critical conservation actions include working with partners to: protect key parcels of privately-owned land; reduce public access to sensitive den/basking/birthing areas; reduce road mortality through seasonal evening road closures; improve outreach to towns with rattlesnake occurrences (including neighboring landowners); strengthen law enforcement efforts; headstart young snakes to augment natural occurrences as needed; and monitor populations following standardized protocols. These actions are ranked and implemented by a network of conservation partners coordinated by MassWildlife, but they do not appear sufficient to ensure the continued existence of the species at the handful of sites where it currently occurs. Given the wide range of conservation challenges that have proven difficult to mitigate, a statewide rattlesnake conservation strategy would be greatly strengthened by restoring rattlesnakes to a fully protected location. MassWildlife is exploring the feasibility of restoring rattlesnakes to a protected site within the original range of the species as an urgently needed action to offset continued rapid decline. This effort will preserve genetic diversity and help ensure continued survival of the species should conservation efforts at one or more existing sites fail. In 2017, a Rattlesnake Working Group composed of Quabbin Region stakeholders, state agency officials, and scientific staff was formed to identify and consider concerns.