The Official Website of the Massachusetts State Ethics Commission

Massachusetts State Ethics Commission

COMMISSION ADVISORY NO. 84-01

POLITICAL ACTIVITY

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this Advisory (1) is to explain to public employees (i.e., all current officers and employees of Massachusetts state, county, and municipal government agencies, elected and appointed, full-time and part-time, paid and unpaid) how the conflict of interest law applies to their political activities. The term "political activity" includes, but is not necessarily limited to, any activity that is in support of or opposition to a federal, state or local candidate or political party or a state or local ballot question.

In most cases, public employees are free to engage in political activities on their own time as individuals, subject to the limitations discussed in this Advisory (including the campaign finance law's, G.L. c. 55, prohibition against political fundraising in public buildings and by appointed, compensated public employees). Nothing in the conflict of interest law prohibits a public employee from running for any public office, including seeking re-election.(2) The conflict of interest law does not require a candidate to take a leave of absence from his or her public job, but the employee’s own agency may require such a leave or establish other limitations stricter than those of the conflict of interest law. If a public employee is elected to another public office, certain restrictions (not discussed in this Advisory) may apply to holding both jobs at the same time; the Commission’s Legal Division can provide advice about multiple office holding.

Conversely, public employees may not engage in political activities on public time. Public resources and the tax dollars that fund such resources are to be used for governmental purposes; not for political activity. Public resources include paid staff time, facilities, supplies and equipment.

For the first three subjects discussed in this Advisory (campaign use of public resources, campaigning on the job, and solicitation and fundraising), the campaign finance law often, but not always, establishes stricter requirements than the conflict of interest law. The state Office of Campaign and Political Finance (OCPF) administers and enforces the state campaign finance law, and can provide complete advice about its interpretation (see Appendix B). At times, these two laws have overlapping jurisdiction. In such cases, public employees must comply with both laws.

Section 23 of the conflict of interest law contains prohibitions that apply to all public employees in the Commonwealth. Two of those prohibitions provide that public employees may not, knowingly or with reason to know:

SUMMARY

As explained in detail below, the Massachusetts conflict of interest law(3) prohibits all public employees, whether compensated or not, from:

In considering whether an activity is an appropriate governmental activity or an activity that is a predominantly political activity, answers to the following questions may be helpful:

Determining whether an activity is predominantly political or governmental depends on the particular facts of each case. The Commission recognizes that this determination can be difficult. Whenever there is a question whether an activity is political or governmental in nature, public employees should seek prospective advice from the Commission regarding such an activity.

I. CAMPAIGN USE OF PUBLIC RESOURCES

The use of public resources of substantial value ($50 or more), available by virtue of one’s public employment, for the purpose of conducting, supporting or opposing a candidate or otherwise engaging in a political activity is the use of one’s official position to secure an unwarranted privilege for oneself or another.(5) These resources include staff time, publicly provided stationery, office supplies, utilities, telephones, office equipment (e.g. copying machines, typewriters, word processors, fax machines, e-mail), office space or other facilities.(6) These are intended for the conduct of public business, not for conducting political activity or otherwise advancing the political interests of public employees. Thus, political activity that is not in furtherance of the purpose for which government funds were appropriated is prohibited. Elected officials should take appropriate steps to keep separate official and political activities and to ensure that political and campaign activities take place outside of their public offices.

The Commission recognizes that, in limited circumstances, the use of public resources may be incidental to the officially related duties of a public official, for example, when the public official’s staff needs to coordinate with the official’s campaign scheduler. In such instances, staff time should be limited as much as is practicable. In circumstances where the use of public resources becomes more than incidental, the matter should be referred to the campaign. For example, if a series of questions to or an interview of a public press officer by a member of the media becomes predominantly focused on a political campaign, the press officer should conclude the interview by referring the media representative to the campaign for further discussion. A public employee or his or her staff should not engage in proactive political activity using public resources. For example, state employees who are required to be with elected officials at a political event, e.g., for security purposes, may not perform political activities such as distributing campaign materials at a political event. In addition, public resources may not be utilized to:

Moreover, the Commission has ruled that candidates who are public officials or employees may not use the state seal (or state "coat of arms") even on privately purchased stationery, for fundraising or other campaign purposes. The seal may be used solely for official state purposes, not for the private purpose of a campaign.

Finally, if a policy, rule or regulation prohibits the use of a public facility or public resources, such a use would be an unwarranted privilege. For example, the Bureau of State Office Buildings manages the state office buildings located at the Government Center Complex in Boston including the State House, John W. McCormack, Charles F. Hurley and Erich Lindemann Buildings as well as one in Pittsfield and one in Springfield. The Bureau’s policy manual states, "Activities in support of political candidates or ballot questions are not permitted on Bureau grounds."

II. CAMPAIGNING ON THE JOB

Public employees may not engage in political activities during their normal working hours. While employed by the taxpayers, they are to be doing the taxpayers’ work, and not politicking for themselves or individual candidates, or in support of or opposition to election ballot questions. For appointed public employees, normal working hours are those set by the employer through regulations or otherwise, or as designated in the applicable collective bargaining agreement. Where such hours have not been clearly defined, the employee is responsible for resolving any ambiguity with his or her appointing official before engaging in political work.

III. SOLICITATION AND FUNDRAISING

The conflict of interest law forbids public employees from soliciting anything of substantial value from those they oversee, because of the "inherently coercive" nature of such solicitations. The Commission has applied this principle to political campaigns. Thus, public employees may not solicit campaign assistance from persons they regulate or who are under their supervision. For example, they may not use their official title or authority, or their presence at a meeting under coercive circumstances, to solicit non-monetary campaign assistance. They may also not solicit private, paid business relationships with such persons they oversee (including, for example, the provision of paid political consulting services).

If persons under the public employee’s jurisdiction wish to enter into such a private business relationship with the public employee, the public employee must publicly disclose in writing the existence of the private business relationship, and the facts that the person under his jurisdiction initiated it and entered into it entirely voluntarily.

The same principle applies to campaign fundraising. Thus, appointed public employees (whether compensated or not) may not solicit political contributions from other public employees whom they supervise, vendors that they oversee, or anyone over whom they may have regulatory power. The Commission has not addressed whether this prohibition applies to elected officials except in situations where there has been an express or implied link between the making of a contribution and a subordinate’s appointment or employment..(8) In addition, sections 2 and 3 of G.L. c. 268A prohibit both appointed and elected public officials from soliciting or accepting campaign contributions or political services in return for being influenced in their official acts. In re Nolan, 1989 SEC 415. See Commonwealth v. Borans, 379 Mass. 117, 142 (1979). See also G.L. c. 55, §§16-17; c. 56, §§33-36 (criminal statutes not enforced by Commission).

It should be noted again that the most significant restrictions on campaign fundraising by Massachusetts public employees are not enforced by the State Ethics Commission; they are found in the state campaign finance law which is administered by OCPF. Among other things, these restrictions prohibit public employees who are both appointed and compensated from directly or indirectly soliciting or receiving any political funds from anyone; prohibit anyone from giving, soliciting, or receiving political funds in any public building; and forbid requiring any public employee to contribute any political funds or to render any political service. For complete details, contact OCPF.

IV. REPRESENTING CAMPAIGNS IN DEALINGS WITH THE GOVERNMENT

The conflict of interest law (G.L. c. 268A, §§4, 11, 17) also prohibits an appointed or elected public employee from acting as agent or attorney for, or receiving compensation from, anyone other than the government in connection with a particular matter in which the same level of government (state, county, or municipal) is a party or has a direct and substantial interest. Both the state and municipalities have a direct and substantial interest in some election-related matters, including the regulation of campaign finances and the conduct of elections. Thus, a full-time state or municipal employee may not represent a campaign (or anyone else) in dealings with the same level of government. For example, a full-time municipal employee (other than a candidate who must by law sign campaign finance reports) could not sign a municipal campaign finance report, to be filed with the town clerk;(9) nor could the employee be paid to help prepare the report, even if he did not sign or deliver it. A full-time state employee could not act as a candidate’s lawyer (even on her own time and without a fee) before the State Ballot Law Commission; nor could the employee be paid to review signatures on nomination papers in preparation for such an objection proceeding, even if she never appeared before the state Commission.

This prohibition is much narrower in scope for part-time or unpaid public employees who are "special" employees.(10) Since the prohibition applies only to representation in connection with matters relating to a "special" employee’s own agency, it will prohibit such election-related representation only if the "special" employee is employed by the election agency itself.

APPENDIX A. CAMPAIGN ACTIVITIES BY ELECTION OFFICIALS

"Election officials" are the public employees who actually conduct elections; they include the Secretary of State and the Secretary’s election staff, State Ballot Law Commissioners, and at the municipal level, city and town clerks, election commissioners, registrars, and their full-time and part-time staffs, including the election officers who staff the polls on election day. In addition to establishing the general restrictions above that apply to all public employees,(11) the conflict of interest law applies to these election officials in other ways.(12)

First, candidates for compensated offices have a financial interest in their own election. Therefore, §§6 and 19 of the conflict of interest law ordinarily(13) prohibit election officials from participating in decisions that can affect the outcome of an election at which a candidate for a compensated office is the official himself or herself, or the official’s immediate family member(14) or business partner; or in which a political committee for which the official is an officer or a paid employee has an interest; or in which the official otherwise has a financial interest in the outcome. Examples of these decisions (which the conflict of interest law calls "particular matters") are decisions about counting votes or absentee ballots, about eligibility to vote or to register, and about certifying, filing, and objecting to nomination papers and ballot question petitions. Participation includes not only making the decision, but discussing or advising about it.

If an election official is unable to participate, the election laws often provide for a substitute.(15) For example, an elected Town Clerk who is a candidate for re-election may not participate in decisions that may affect his or her own election. Other officials are available to make these decisions (depending on the decision, an assistant or temporary clerk, other registrars, or election officers).

Second, G.L. c. 268A, §23(b)(2) (discussed in the Introduction above) prohibits election officials from using their official positions to secure an unwarranted privilege for a candidate or anyone else. Thus, while this section does not prohibit election officials who have publicly supported a candidate (or a position on a ballot question) from participating in official election-related decisions, they must base such decisions solely on the merits, using the same objective standards they would apply to all similar decisions. These objective standards are found, for example, in the election statutes, relevant case law, and regulations of the Secretary of State. Furthermore, §23(b)(3) requires election officials who have actively participated in campaigns or publicly supported a candidate (or a position on a ballot question) to make a public, written disclosure(16) of these facts before they participate in any decision that can affect the outcome of the relevant election.

Finally, §23(e) allows election officials’ supervisors to establish and enforce additional requirements. A May 1990 advisory from the State Secretary’s Elections Division, for example, advises that "in most cases, election officials should choose between publicly displaying support for a candidate (or a position on a ballot question) and participating in official decisions that may affect that candidate (or ballot question)." In this connection, the Secretary’s advisory notes that some city and town clerks have prohibited election officers from displaying political buttons and bumper stickers even on their "off" hours, although this policy is not required by the state conflict of interest or election laws.

APPENDIX B. OTHER AGENCIES

The State Ethics Commission can give advice only about the state conflict of interest law. Other state and federal laws regulate the political activities of Massachusetts public employees; they are administered by the agencies listed below. Furthermore, individual public agencies may place additional limitations on the political activities of their employees. Public employees should determine what restrictions apply to them in their own public jobs.

For more information about these other laws and related subjects, contact:

For more information about the state conflict of interest and financial disclosure laws (G.L. cc. 268A & 268B), including the subjects discussed in this Advisory, please contact:

     Legal Division
     State Ethics Commission (www.mass.gov/ethics)
     One Ashburton Place, Room 619
     Boston, MA 02108
     (617) 371-9500

DATE AUTHORIZED: May 8, 1984

REVISED: January, 2004

REVISED: April, 2006

ENDNOTES

1. The Commission issues Advisories periodically to interpret various provision of the conflict of interest law. Advisories respond to issues that may arise in the context of a particular advisory opinion or enforcement action but which have the potential for broad application. It is important to keep in mind that this advisory is general in nature and is not an exhaustive review of the conflict law. For specific questions, public officials and employees should contact their agency counsel or the Legal Division of the State Ethics Commission at (617) 371-9500. Copies of all Advisories are available from the Commission office or online at online at www.mass.gov/ethics.

2. The federal Hatch Act applies to state and local employees who are principally employed in connection with programs financed in whole or in part by loans or grants made by the United States or a federal agency. In some instances, the Hatch Act may prohibit such employees from becoming candidates for public office in a partisan election; using official authority or influence to interfere with or affect the results of an election or nomination or directly or indirectly coercing contributions from subordinates in support of a political party or candidate (see Appendix B).

3. In addition, as explained below, the state campaign finance law sometimes establishes stricter requirements. Among other things, it prohibits public employees who are both appointed and compensated from directly or indirectly soliciting or receiving any political funds from anyone; prohibits anyone from giving, soliciting, or receiving political funds in any public building; and forbids requiring any public employee to contribute any political funds or to render any political service. For complete details, contact OCPF (see Appendix B).

4. The Commission has ruled that anything with a monetary value of less than $50 is not of substantial value

5. Although the State Ethics Commission has reached the conclusions in parts I and II under the state conflict of interest law, G.L. c. 268A, § 23(b)(2), OCPF has reached similar conclusions under the state campaign finance law as interpreted by a state Supreme Judicial Court decision, Anderson v. City of Boston, 376 Mass. 178 (1978), appeal dismissed, 439 U.S. 1069 (1979). For complete details, contact OCPF. Note that the campaign finance law and Anderson prohibit campaign use of public resources even if they are not of "substantial value."

6. Public facilities that are in fact available to the general public for use may be available for conducting certain political activities in accordance with the terms and conditions of the facility and on an equitable basis.

7. In Interpretive Bulletin 95-03, the Office of Campaign and Political Finance concluded, "An elected official or the official’s staff may use public resources to produce and distribute information to constituents regarding the official’s position on issues if the activity is consistent with the official’s responsibilities. Elected officials and their staff may also use public resources to respond to criticism of the official’s record, even from opponents, provided such use is reasonable and proportionate in scope. Public resources may not be used to attack the candidacy of an opponent."

8. See advisory opinion EC-COI-92-12, footnote 10, Public Enforcement Letter 95-2 (sheriff violated G.L. c. 268A, § 23(b)(2) by combining official swearing-in ceremonies for deputy sheriffs with political campaign fundraising events) and In the Matter of Michael Bencal, 2006 SEC ___, (city councillor violated the same section by soliciting a contribution from municipal employee to assure his continued employment).

9. OCPF has interpreted the campaign finance law to prohibit an appointed, compensated public employee from being a treasurer for a candidate or a political committee.

10. A "special state employee" is an appointed state employee who is unpaid, or is allowed by the state agency to do personal or private work during normal working hours (and the agency classification or permission is filed with the State Ethics Commission), or in fact earns compensation for no more than 800 hours during the preceding 365 days. G.L. c. 268A, § 1(o).

A "special municipal employee" is an elected or appointed municipal employee (except a mayor, alderman, councillor, or a selectman in a town of more than 10,000 population) who meets the same requirements (except for disclosure to this Commission) and holds a position so designated by vote of the City Council or Selectmen. Id. § 1(n).

11. Note that G.L. c. 268A, § § 4, 17 (discussed in part IV above) prohibit even election officials who are "special" employees from representing anyone in dealings with their own election agency. However, designating part-time municipal election officials, such as registrars, assistant registrars, and election officers, as "special municipal employees" is important for another reason. If they are not so designated, G.L. c. 268A, § 20 will prohibit full-time paid municipal employees from serving as election officials. Regular full-time, municipal employees may hold a part-time election official position if: (1) their election official positions are filled after public notice, (2) they make public written disclosure to the City or Town Clerk of their salaries in both jobs, (3) their election supervisor files with the Clerk a written certificate that no regular employee of the supervisor’s office is available, and (4) the City Council or Selectmen vote to exempt them by name. See G.L. c. 268A, § 20(b). Part-time municipal employees holding positions designated as specials may also hold a part-time election official position also designated as ’special’ if they make an appropriate disclosure. See G.L. C. 268A, § 20(c). If they are already part-time election officials in another capacity, they may also need approval from the City Council or Board of Selectmen. See G.L. c. 268A, § 20 (d).

12. Note that G.L. cc. 50-54, which govern election procedures may have additional restrictions. Election officials should seek guidance from the Office of the Secretary of State about such restrictions.

13. An election official may participate nevertheless if an appointed official’s appointing authority determines in writing beforehand that the financial interest was not so substantial as to interfere with the integrity of the official’s services (for state officials, this determination and the official’s written disclosure must be filed with the Commission).

14. An official’s "immediate family" is the official and his or her spouse, and their parents, children, brothers and sisters.

15. For example, the first deputy Secretary would substitute for the Secretary of State (G.L. c. 9, § 3). An assistant clerk, or a temporary clerk appointed by the Mayor or Selectmen, would substitute for the City or Town Clerk (G.L. c. 41, § § 14, 18, 19). A temporary registrar or election commissioner could similarly be appointed (G.L. c. 51, § 20).

16.Appointed election official make this disclosure to their appointing authority. The Secretary makes it to the State Ethics Commission. An elected town clerk posts it in his or her own office.


Home   Educational Materials