Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 268A § 4(c) prohibits state employees, including elected officials, from acting as agent (or attorney) for anyone other than the Commonwealth on any matter in which the Commonwealth is a party or has a direct and substantial interest. This provision is intended to prevent divided loyalties which would result if state employees attempted to "serve two masters" -- i.e., the state and a second party -- with different or conflicting interests. Section 4 is based on the principle that "public employees should be loyal to the state, and where their loyalty to the state conflicts with their loyalty to a private party or employer, the state's interest must win out." EC-COI-82-176.
For instance, on matters involving the Commonwealth, state employees are prohibited from acting as agents for other individuals, corporations, municipal governments, advocacy groups, business partnerships, trusts, associations, charitable organizations, and the like. Types of activities prohibited by § 4 include: submitting applications or supporting documentation; preparing documents that require a professional seal; contacting other people, groups or agencies; writing letters; serving as attorney; and serving as spokesperson.
Note that § 4 not only prohibits state officials from representing private parties before their own board or agency, but also prohibits them from representing anyone:
- before other state boards and agencies
- before municipal or federal agencies
- to private business or charitable organizations, or
- to private individuals
- in any instance where the Commonwealth is a party to, or has a direct and substantial interest in, the matter.
The purpose of this advisory is to assist state employees and officials to recognize those situations where they are prohibited from acting as the representative for another, and to enumerate exceptions to the law where they exist. Examples in this advisory are for the purposes of illustration only. Whether or not § 4 is triggered will depend on the specific facts of the situation.
MATTERS IN WHICH THE STATE HAS A "DIRECT AND SUBSTANTIAL INTEREST"
Before acting in a private capacity in connection with a particular matter, state employees should first determine if the Commonwealth is a party to or has a "direct and substantial interest" in the matter. Examples of these situations include:
- any matter pending before, under the official jurisdiction of, or involving action by a state agency, board, commission, authority or other body;
- any effort to change state regulations, policies or procedures;
- any contract, court case or other legal matter to which the Commonwealth is a party, or otherwise has a direct and substantial interest; or
- any ruling or other action by a federal, county, regional or municipal agency involving matters which are subject to regulation by the Commonwealth.
If the Commonwealth is not a party to and does not have a "direct and substantial interest" in the matter, the restrictions of § 4 will not be triggered, and the state employee may act as agent, representative or attorney.
PROHIBITION ON ACTING AS AGENT FOR ANOTHER
If the Commonwealth does have a "direct and substantial interest" in the matter, the state employee must also determine whether an activity would constitute "acting as agent". Section 4(c) prohibits a state employee from acting as agent in connection with such matters -- even if the employee is not paid for his or her actions.
An agent is anyone who represents another person or organization in their dealings with a third party. Almost any instance where the state employee is acting on behalf of someone else by:
- contacting or communicating with a third party;
- acting as a liaison with a third party;
- providing documents to a third party; or
- serving as spokesperson before a third party can be considered "acting as agent".
Note that the restrictions of § 4(c) are not triggered if the state employee is not representing someone before a third party. A state employee may offer advice to others and may help plan strategies, as long as his or her activity does not reach the level of "acting as agent". (Note, however, that the state employee may violate § 4(a) if he or she accepts pay or other compensation for such activities.)
For example, a state employee may not submit a grant application to a state agency on behalf of his neighbor because he is more familiar with the application procedures than she is; this action would constitute acting as an agent, even if it is done merely as a favor and for free. However, the employee may advise his neighbor on the application procedures and the content of the application.
A state employee may not sign and send letters on behalf of a grassroots organization advocating a change in state regulations, even if the letters are addressed to private individuals. The employee may participate in committee discussions to plan the mailing, as long as the letter is signed and sent by some other member of the organization.
A state employee may not attend a community meeting and speak on behalf of a private company, if the Commonwealth is a party to or has a direct and substantial interest in the matter being discussed at the meeting. However, the employee may help the company's officials develop a strategy to mitigate the community's concerns.
There are several specific exceptions to the general prohibition that state employees may not act as agent in matters of concern to the Commonwealth.
PERMITTED CONSTITUENCY WORK
State employees may generally act as agents for others if their state jobs authorize it. This applies to both appointed and elected officials performing constituency work.
Certain state jobs authorize employees to act as the agent for private parties concerning matters of interest to the state. For example, an Executive Office of Communities and Development employee's responsibility may include advocating on behalf of low-income citizens to increase the number of local affordable housing units. This kind of constituency work is not only expected but demanded in the employee's job description. Accordingly, it is permissible for the employee to act as the agent for the private party (in this case, the low-income citizen).
The following guidelines should be used to help determine what is permissible constituency work and what is a prohibited act of agency. Generally, a state employee who acts on behalf of a private citizen will be considered to be performing constituency work if:
- the actions are within the scope of the state employee's job responsibilities;
- the state employee receives no compensation beyond his or her regular salary;
- the state employee has no financial interest in the matter;
- the constituent is not a relative or a business associate, or a partner, trustee, officer or director of an organization with which the state employee is associated;
- the state employee is not taking action as the constituent's attorney; and
- the constituent lives or does business within the geographic region under the state employee's official jurisdiction (e.g., a legislative district or a service district).
On the other hand, if a state employee represents a relative, his or her employer or a business associate before state agencies, is paid a fee by the constituent for the action taken or has a personal financial stake in the matter, these actions will not be considered legitimate constituency work and are prohibited.
Remember that allowable constituency work includes only those activities "within the proper discharge of official duties." An economic development specialist would not be performing permissible constituency work if she called the Appellate Tax Board to lobby for her neighbor's tax abatement, since the tax abatement has nothing to do with the development specialist's official duties. Alternatively, if a Rate Setting Commissioner pursues a provider's complaint against a regulator, this is a permissible constituency service since the regulator is hired and ultimately supervised by the Rate Setting Commission.
The Ethics Commission has stated in a prior advisory opinion that a public employee's appointing authority has "some latitude ... to determine what constitute[s] the proper discharge of official duties ... " EC-COI-83-137. Therefore, if an employee's appointing authority makes a decision that a particular activity is "in the proper discharge of the [employee's] official duties," the Commission will ordinarily defer to this judgment. However, the Commission will review an appointing official's determination of what is in the proper discharge of official duties if that determination "far exceed[s] the customary job requirements for an employee [so] as to frustrate the purposes of the [conflict of interest law] ... " Id.
If the employee is unsure whether his or her action on behalf of a constituent is in "the proper discharge of official duties," the employee should seek legal advice from his or her agency's legal counsel or the Legal Division of the State Ethics Commission.
SPECIAL STATE EMPLOYEES
"Special state employees" may generally act as agents before state agencies other than their own. A state employee is considered a "special state employee" if:
- he is not paid or otherwise compensated for his state position; or
- he holds an appointed position which, by terms of the employment contract or the position classification, permits personal or private employment during normal working hours (a disclosure of this permission or classification must be filed with the Ethics Commission before the employee begins such "outside" employment); or
- he holds an appointed position and has not been compensated by the state for more than 800 hours of work during the previous 365 days.
If a state employee holds a job that qualifies as a "special state employee" position, the employee may represent private parties on matters of direct and substantial interest to the state if:
- the employee has not participated at any time as a state employee or special state employee in the matter;
- the matter is not and has not been the subject of the employee's official responsibility; and
- the matter is not pending in the state agency or board for which the employee works.
There is one narrow instance where a special state employee may represent a private party before the board he or she works for -- the special state employee may not be a member of the board, must work fewer than 60 days in any 365-day period, and must have neither participated in the matter nor had official responsibility for it.
Also, "special state employees" may generally assist with work under a contract with the Commonwealth, if their appointing authority certifies in writing that the interest of the Commonwealth requires such aid or assistance (a copy of this certification must be filed with the Ethics Commission).
Note that the terms "participation" and "official responsibility" are broadly defined in the statute. "Participation" includes: giving advice or making recommendations; drafting or revising; approving or disapproving; declining to act; delegating; investigating; and otherwise personally affecting a matter. "Official responsibility" is defined as the ability or opportunity to approve, disapprove or otherwise direct an action, and includes: instances where the employee is an intermediate decision-maker instances where the employee is the final authority; and instances where the authority is not exercised personally, but rather through subordinates. A matter may be considered under an employee's "official responsibility" even if he or she abstains from participating in it.
For more information about this exemption, contact your agency's legal counsel or the Legal Division of the State Ethics Commission.
State legislators are generally allowed to act as agents before state boards, provided that they are not paid for the representation.
Legislators are allowed to be paid to represent others in court proceedings, quasi-judicial proceedings, and any instance where the particular matter before the state agency is "ministerial" in nature.
ASSISTING SUBJECTS OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
Section 4 also allows state employees to assist anyone who is the subject of disciplinary or other personnel proceedings, provided that they are not paid for the representation.
ASSISTING IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBERS
In many instances, appointed state employees may act as agents for members of their immediate families, or for anyone with whom they have a "fiduciary" relationship, if they first get permission from their appointing authority. This exemption is not available to elected officials; nor is it available for matters in which the employees have participated, or which are under their official responsibility.
The conflict of interest law recognizes that Commonwealth employees may be asked to assist members of their immediate families in dealing with state matters. "Immediate family" includes the employee, the employee's spouse, and both of their parents, brothers, sisters and children. The conflict law permits an appointed state employee to act as the paid or unpaid agent for members of his or her immediate family or for any person for whom the employee serves as guardian, executor, administrator or other personal fiduciary, as long as the employee has received prior permission from his or her appointing authority and does not participate in (nor have responsibility for) the matter involved.
A state employee must meet the following criteria to be allowed to represent an immediate family member (or one with whom the employee has a fiduciary relationship):
a. the state employee must be appointed (not elected);
b. the state employee must be representing a family member or one for whom the employee is a fiduciary on a matter in which the employee did not participate (as a state official), and for which the employee did not have official responsibility; and
c. the state employee must receive written permission from the official who appointed the employee to his or her position before the action occurs.
TESTIMONY UNDER OATH
State employees are generally allowed to give testimony under oath; however, they should contact the Ethics Commission's Legal Division before serving as a paid witness.
HOLDING MUNICIPAL POSITIONS
State employees may also hold elected and appointed municipal positions, but are prohibited from acting (in their municipal positions) on any matter within the official jurisdiction of their own state agency.
STATE INCOME TAX RETURNS
State employees -- except for employees of the Department of Revenue -- may be paid for assisting in the preparation, filing or amendment of state income tax returns.
MATTERS OF GENERAL LEGISLATION
State employees may represent others on matters of general legislation and certain home-rule petitions. For example, state employees may represent advocacy groups or other parties in order to draft, promote or oppose general legislation. Note that matters involving "special legislation", state regulations or administrative policies are not eligible for this exemption.
For more information about this exemption, or for a determination as to whether a bill is "general legislation" or "special legislation", contact your agency's legal counsel or the Legal Division of the State Ethics Commission.
REPRESENTING ONE'S OWN INTERESTS AND PERSONAL POINTS OF VIEW
Since acting on one's own behalf is not considered acting as agent, a state employee may always represent his or her own interests or points of view. For instance, a state employee may file her own grant application, or represent himself before the Appellate Tax Board.
Note, however, that in matters involving the Commonwealth, a state employee may not act on behalf of his or her own business partnership; representing the partnership would, by definition, involve acting as an agent.
State employees may represent themselves before their own agencies, although they may not take any type of official action on the matter that affects themselves. In this situation, the employees should make every effort to clarify that they are acting on their own behalf, including:
- stating, in all written correspondence, that they are acting on their own behalf, and in their personal capacities rather than their official role;
- sitting in the audience before speaking at a hearing or public meeting, rather than sitting with other officials or staff members;
- making a public declaration, to be included in the minutes of the meeting, that they are acting on their own behalf, and in their personal capacities rather than their official role; and
- leaving the room during any Executive Session deliberations on the matter.
State employees may also express their personal points of view concerning a matter pending before state agencies. However, in such a case, the employee should clarify the situation by explaining that his or her comments constitute a personal opinion, and are not made on behalf of any group, organization, business or other individual. Without such a clarifying statement, the circumstances surrounding the employee's comments could be interpreted to constitute acting as an agent.
Note that when representing themselves or expressing personal points of view, state employees must also observe § 6 of the conflict law, which prohibits state employees from taking any type of official action on matters which affect their own financial interests, or the financial interests of their immediate families, businesses or other organizations with which they are closely associated.
It is important to keep in mind that this advisory is general in nature and is not an exhaustive review of the conflict law. For specific questions, public officials and employees should contact their agency counsel or the Legal Division of the State Ethics Commission at (617) 371-9500.
AUTHORIZED: July 12, 1994
1. Advisory No. 88-01 covers Municipal employees; Advisory No. 94-02 covers County employees.