The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
——————
PETITION OF:
——————
In the Year Two Thousand and Seven.
——————
|
An Act relative to arbitration for automobile insurance property damange. . |
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
SECTION
1. Section 191A of Chapter 175 of the General Laws, as so appearing in the 2000
Official Edition, is hereby amended by striking the second subparagraph of
paragraph one thereof, and inserting in its stead, the following:—
If the named insured, or the repairer chosen by the insured to make repairs to
the vehicle, and the company fails to agree as to the amount of loss, each
shall, on the written demand of the other made within ninety days after receipt
of proof of loss by the company, submit to binding arbitration as to the amount
of the loss. The party demanding arbitration shall select a competent and
disinterested licensed auto damage appraiser as an arbitrator and shall
identify the appraiser in its demand. The other party shall thereafter select a
competent and disinterested licensed auto damage appraiser as a second
arbitrator and shall identify the appraiser to the party demanding arbitration
within five working days of receipt of the demand for arbitration. The two
chosen arbitrators shall choose another competent and disinterested licensed
auto damage appraiser, who shall then serve as an umpire. If the two
arbitrators chosen by the parties cannot agree upon an umpire within five
working days after being appointed, then either party may file a petition for
appointment of the umpire with the division of the district court department of
the trial court for the district within which either the vehicle owner or the
repair shop chosen to make repairs is located. Such petition shall be
accompanied by a filing fee in the amount of the usual filing fee for a
complaint, as well as a list of not less than three competent and disinterested
licensed auto damage appraisers and a summary of the qualifications of each
such listed appraiser. At the time of filing such petition, the court shall
schedule same for hearing, such hearing to be held within seven days of the
filing. The petitioner shall forthwith serve notification of the date and time
of hearing and a copy of the petition and submitted list of appraisers upon the
other chosen arbitrator by hand delivery or by certified mail. Such other
chosen arbitrator shall also submit a list of not less than three competent and
disinterested licensed auto damage appraisers and a summary of the
qualifications of each such listed appraiser. At the scheduled hearing, the
court shall appoint an umpire from the lists submitted. Such hearing shall be
held on an informal basis, utilizing the rules of evidence applicable to cases
heard under the procedure established by section 21 of chapter 218. Within five
working days of selecting the umpire, the two initially chosen arbitrators
shall also independently appraise the loss, such appraisals to be made at a
reasonable time and place. Each arbitrator shall itemize the cost of repair, or
shall state in writing the actual cash value of a vehicle appraised as a total
loss. The arbitrators shall then attempt to agree as to the amount of the loss.
If the two chosen arbitrators shall fail to agree within five working days
after making their appraisals, they then shall submit their appraisals to the
umpire within three working days of the expiration of the said five day period.
The umpire, within five working days of receiving the arbitrators’ appraisals,
shall make an award, rendered by selecting one of the two appraisals as
submitted by the arbitrators. An award in writing of any two shall determine
the amount of loss. Such decision shall be binding upon the parties. Within
five working days of the umpire’s decision, the insurer shall make payment on
the award accordingly. The named insured and the company shall each pay their
own chosen arbitrator and shall bear equally the expenses of the umpire. An
insurer that fails to comply with the provisions of this section shall be
deemed to have engaged in unfair claims settlement practices in violation of
section 3(9) of chapter 176D.