By Representative Garry of Dracut and Senator Panagiotakos, joint petition (accompanied by bill, 1460) of Colleen M. Garry and others relative to shared parenting in cases of divorce. The Judiciary.

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

——————

PETITION OF:

 


Colleen M. Garry

Steven C. Panagiotakos

Todd M. Smola

Dianne Wilkerson

David B. Sullivan

Robert K. Coughlin

Thomas P. Kennedy

F. Jay Barrows

Thomas A. Golden, Jr.

Jeffrey Davis Perry

Joseph F. Wagner

John J. Binienda

Geoffrey D. Hall

Stephen M. Brewer

John P. Fresolo

Robert P. Spellane

Patrick M. Natale

Cory Atkins

John A. Lepper

Stephen P. LeDuc

Eric Turkington

David M. Nangle

Paul C. Casey

Anne M. Gobi

Bradley H. Jones, Jr.

Thomas J. Calter

Christine E. Canavan

Richard J. Ross

Lewis G. Evangelidis

John F. Quinn

George N. Peterson, Jr.

Pam Richardson

Scott P. Brown

Denis E. Guyer

Thomas M. Stanley

Stephen R. Canessa

Robert L. Hedlund

Harold P. Naughton, Jr.

Michael E. Festa

Elizabeth A. Poirier

Paul J. P. Loscocco

Robert J. Nyman

Susan C. Fargo

Richard T. Moore

 

 


 

——————

In the Year Two Thousand and Seven.

——————

 

 An Act relative to shared parenting.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:


 

SECTION 1.  Section 31 of Chapter 208 of the General Laws, as appearing in
the most recent edition, is hereby amended in the sixth paragraph by striking
the following:.- When considering the happiness and welfare of the child, the
court shall consider whether or not the child's present or past living
conditions adversely affect his physical, mental, moral or emotional health.
 
      SECTION 2. Said section 31 is hereby further amended by inserting after
the sixth paragraph the following new paragraph:- In furtherance of the public
policy that the happiness and welfare of children is enhanced by frequent and
continuing contact with both their parents, upon the filing of an action in
accordance with the provisions of this section, section twenty eight of this
chapter, or section thirty-two of chapter two hundred and nine, the parents
shall have temporary shared legal custody and shared physical custody of any
minor child of the parties. In making an order or judgment relative to the
custody of a minor child, there shall be a presumption that, absent emergency
conditions, or abuse or neglect of said child, the parents shall have shared
legal custody and shared physical custody of said child. The judge may enter
any order or judgment for sole legal custody for one parent and/or sole
physical custody for one parent if written findings are made setting forth the
specific facts supporting a determination that the child would be harmed as a
result of shared legal or shared physical custody. In making any order or
judgment concerning the parenting schedule of each parent with a minor child,
the rights of the parents, absent emergency, abuse, or neglect of one of the
parents, shall be held to be equal, and the Court shall endeavor to maximize
the exposure of the child to each of the parents so far as the same is
practicable. A change in the availability of one or both parents to parent a
minor child, and/or a change in the developmental stage of a minor child, shall be presumed to constitute a material and substantial change
in circumstances for the purposes of a complaint or counterclaim seeking to
modify a parenting schedule or parenting plan incorporated into a judgment of
divorce. Nothing herein shall be deemed to modify the provisions of G.L. c.208,
sec. 31A.
 
      SECTION 3. Said section 31 is hereby further amended by striking the
following paragraphs:-
      Upon the filing of an action in accordance with the provisions of this
section, section twenty-eight of this chapter, or section thirty-two of chapter
two hundred and nine and until a judgment on the merits is rendered, absent
emergency conditions, abuse or neglect, the parents shall have temporary shared
legal custody of any minor child of the marriage; provided, however, that the
judge may enter an order for temporary sole legal custody for one parent if
written findings are made that such shared custody would not be in the best
interest of the child. Nothing herein shall be construed to create any
presumption of temporary shared physical custody.
      In determining whether temporary shared legal custody would not be in the
best interest of the child, the court shall consider all relevant facts
including, but not limited to, whether any member of the family abuses alcohol
or other drugs or has deserted the child and whether the parties have a history
of being able and willing to cooperate in matters concerning the child.
      If, despite the prior or current issuance of a restraining order against
one parent pursuant to chapter two hundred and nine A, the court orders shared
legal or physical custody either as a temporary order or at a trial on the
merits, the court shall provide written findings to support such shared custody
order.
      There shall be no presumption either in favor of or against shared legal
or physical custody at the time of the trial on the merits, except as provided
for in section 31A.
 
      SECTION 4. Said section 31 is hereby further amended in the twelfth
paragraph, in the third sentence, by inserting after the words "The court may
also reject the plan and issue a sole legal and" the following:- /or sole
 
      SECTION 5. Said section 31 is hereby further amended in the twelfth
paragraph, in the third sentence, by inserting after the words "The court may
also reject the plan and issue a sole legal and physical custody award to
either parent" the following new words:- if written findings are made, setting
forth the specific facts supporting a determiniation that the child would be
harmed as a result of shared legal or shared physical custody.
 
      SECTION 6. Said section 31 is hereby further amended in the twelfth
paragraph by inserting after the words "A shared custody implementation plan
issued or accepted by the court shall become part of the judgment in the
action, together with any other appropriate custody orders and orders regarding
the responsibility of the parties for the support of the child." the following
new sentence:- The failure of one or both parties, however, to submit a shared
custody implementation plan for trial shall not diminish the presumption of
joint physical and joint legal custody, nor affect the child's right and the
parents' rights to frequent and continuing contact.
 
      SECTION 7. Said section 31 is hereby further amended by striking the
fourteenth paragraph and inserting in place thereof the following:- If shared
physical custody is ordered, the judge shall at that time make a child support
order, or revise its previous order, as appropriate to the circumstances.
 
      SECTION 8. Said section 31 is hereby further amended, in the last
paragraph, by striking the words "specific findings are made by the court
indicating that such an order would not be in the best interests of the
children" and inserting in place thereof the following:- written findings are
setting forth the specific facts supporting a determination that the child
would be harmed as a result of implementation of the agreement.