|
By Mr. Tobin of Quincy, petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2265) of A. Stephen Tobin relative to establishing new sentencing guidelines. Public Health. |
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
——————
PETITION OF:
——————
In the Year Two Thousand and Seven.
——————
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
SECTION 1. Subsection (c) of section 32A of chapter 94C of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2000 Official Edition, is hereby amended by adding the following three sentences:— In the case of mitigating circumstances as stated in subsection (c) of section 8 of chapter 211G, this offense shall be integrated into the sentencing guidelines grid. The penalty imposed shall be from within the guidelines range, with the minimum sentence representing two-thirds of the maximum sentence. There shall be no further departures from the sentencing guidelines range.
SECTION 2. Paragraph (2) of subsection (a) of said section 32E of said chapter 94C, as so appearing, is hereby amended by adding the following three sentences:— In the case of mitigating circumstances as stated in subsection (c) of section 8 of chapter 211G, this offense shall be integrated into the sentencing guidelines grid. The penalty imposed shall be from within the guidelines range, with the minimum sentence representing two-thirds of the maximum sentence. There shall be no further departures from the sentencing guidelines range.
SECTION 3. Paragraph (3) of said subsection (a) of said section 32E of said chapter 94C, as so appearing, is hereby amended by adding the following three sentences:— In the case of mitigating circumstances as stated in subsection (c) of section 8 of chapter 211G, this offense shall be integrated into the sentencing guidelines grid. The penalty imposed shall be from within the guidelines range, with the minimum sentence representing two-thirds of the maximum sentence. There shall be no further departures from the sentencing guidelines range.
SECTION 4. Paragraph (1) of subsection (b) of said section 32E of said chapter 94C, as so appearing, is hereby amended by adding the following three sentences:— In the case of mitigating circumstances as stated in subsection (c) of section 8 of chapter 211G, this offense shall be integrated into the sentencing guidelines grid. The penalty imposed shall be from within the guidelines range, with the minimum sentence representing two-thirds of the maximum sentence. There shall be no further departures from the sentencing guidelines range.
SECTION 5. Paragraph (2) of said subsection (b) of said section 32E of said chapter 94C, as so appearing, is hereby amended by adding the following three sentences:— In the case of mitigating circumstances as stated in subsection (c) of section 8 of chapter 211G, this offense shall be integrated into the sentencing guidelines grid. The penalty imposed shall be from within the guidelines range, with the minimum sentence representing two-thirds of the maximum sentence. There shall be no further departures from the sentencing guidelines range.
SECTION 6. Paragraph (1) of subsection (c) of said section 32E of said chapter 94C, as so appearing, is hereby amended by adding the following three sentences:— In the case of mitigating circumstances as stated in subsection (c) of section 8 of chapter 211G, this offense shall be integrated into the sentencing guidelines grid. The penalty imposed shall be from within the guidelines range, with the minimum sentence representing two-thirds of the maximum sentence. There shall be no further departures from the sentencing guidelines range.
SECTION 7. Paragraph (2) of said subsection (c) of said section 32E of said chapter 94C, as so appearing, is hereby amended by adding the following three sentences:— In the case of mitigating circumstances as stated in subsection (c) of section 8 of chapter 211G, this offense shall be integrated into the sentencing guidelines grid. The penalty imposed shall be from within the guidelines range, with the minimum sentence representing two-thirds of the maximum sentence. There shall be no further departures from the sentencing guidelines range.
SECTION 8. Section 32J of said chapter 94C, as so appearing, is hereby amended by adding the following three sentences:— In the case of mitigating circumstances as stated in subsection (c) of section 8 of chapter 211G, this offense shall be integrated into the sentencing guidelines grid. The penalty imposed shall be from within the guidelines range, with the minimum sentence representing two-thirds of the maximum sentence. There shall be no further departures from the sentencing guidelines range.
SECTION 9. Section 130 of chapter 127 of the General Laws, as so appearing is hereby amended by striking out the first sentence and inserting in place thereof the following three sentences:— No prisoner shall be granted a parole permit merely as a reward for good conduct but only if the parole board is of the opinion that there is a reasonable probability that, if such prisoner is released, in light of appropriate conditions and community supervision, he will live and remain at liberty without violating the law and that his release is compatible with the welfare of society. In making this determination, the board shall consider whether, during the period of incarceration, the prisoner has participated in available work opportunities and education or treatment programs, and demonstrated good behavior. The board shall also consider whether risk reduction programs made available through collaboration with criminal justice agencies would minimize the probability of the prisoner re-offending once released.
SECTION 10. Section 136 of said chapter 127, as so appearing, is hereby amended by adding the following sentence:— The parole board shall have the option to (1) grant parole, subject to the conditions or limitations as deemed appropriate, (2) deny parole, subject to reconsideration at a specified date with recommendations for interim program participation or treatment, or (3) deny parole.
SECTION 11. Section 3 of chapter 211E of the General Laws, as so appearing, is hereby amended by inserting after the word “part”, in line 8, the following words:— except for the imposition of split sentences to the house of correction pursuant to chapter 211G.
SECTION 12. Said section 3 of said chapter 211E, as so appearing, is hereby further amended by striking out, in lines 15 and 92, the word “non-exclusive” and inserting in place thereof, in each instance, the following word:— exclusive.
SECTION 13. Said section 3 of said chapter 211E, as so appearing, is hereby amended by inserting after the word “statute”, in line 127, the following words:— only to the extent provided by chapter 211G.
SECTION 14. Subsection (f) of section 3 of said chapter 211E, as so appearing, is hereby amended by adding the following sentence:— The commission shall not later than June 1st and annually thereafter report its determination of the type and amount of correctional resources needed and the analysis resulting in such determination to the aforementioned persons, the house and senate committees on ways and means and the joint committee on criminal justice.
SECTION 15. Section 4 of said chapter 211E, as so appearing, is hereby amended by striking out, in lines 4 and 5, and in lines 13 and 14, the words “application of the sentencing guidelines” and inserting in place thereof, in each instance, the following words:— placement within the sentencing grid.
SECTION 16.
Post-Incarceration Supervision. For all sentences to incarceration for a period
of twelve months or more which are imposed in accordance with the sentencing
guidelines as established in this chapter, including minimum mandatory
sentences, there shall be imposed a period of post-incarceration supervision.
The period of post-incarceration supervision shall be imposed as follows: a
period of six months for a sentence with a maximum term greater than or equal
to twelve months but less than thirty months; a period of twelve months for a
sentence with a maximum greater than or equal to thirty months but less than
sixty months; a period of twenty-four months for a sentence with a maximum term
greater than or equal to sixty months. The total term of incarceration for the
offense plus any additional commitment for a violation of a condition of
post-incarceration supervision that does not otherwise constitute a new
offense, shall not be greater than the maximum term fixed by statute for the
governing offense. During the period of post-incarceration supervision, the
prisoner shall be subject to the supervision of the Parole Board under such
terms and conditions as established by the Board.
The post-incarceration supervision period shall be deemed completed if the prisoner
completes the sentence to incarceration while on parole, if the prisoner is
granted a certificate of termination of sentence pursuant to G.L. c. 127, §
130A, if the prisoner is subject upon release from custody to lifetime parole
pursuant to section 133C of chapter 127, or if upon completion of the sentence
the prisoner is immediately committed to a sentence of incarceration, to the
custody of any other state or federal authority, or to the custody of
immigration authorities. The post-incarceration supervision shall be stayed for
any period the prisoner is in custody pursuant to any order of custody under
chapter 123A. The post-incarceration supervision period shall be deemed
completed upon commitment pursuant to section 14 of chapter 123A. In all other
circumstances, the period of post-incarceration supervision shall commence upon
discharge from the sentence.
During the period of post-incarceration supervision, the prisoner shall be
subject to the jurisdiction of the parole board in accordance with section 130
of chapter 127. The prisoner may be supervised in another jurisdiction in
accordance with sections 151A through 151L of chapter 127 and shall be
considered on parole for the purposes of such supervision. By a majority vote
of a panel of the parole board after a hearing and for good cause, the parole
board may terminate the period of post-incarceration supervision at any time
before completion.
An individual who violates a condition of post-incarceration supervision shall
be subject to the provisions of section 149 of chapter 127. Upon a first
violation, the prisoner may be incarcerated for a period no greater than two
months or the maximum remaining period of
post-incarceration supervision, whichever is less, if such violation does not
otherwise constitute a criminal offense. Upon a second violation, the prisoner
may be incarcerated for a period no greater than six months or the maximum
remaining period of post-incarceration supervision, whichever is less, if such
violation does not otherwise constitute a criminal offense. Upon a third or
subsequent violation the prisoner, may be incarcerated for a period no greater
than twelve months or the maximum remaining period of post-incarceration
supervision, whichever is less, if such violation does not otherwise constitute
a criminal offense. If such violation otherwise constitutes a criminal offense,
said period of incarceration shall be served on and after any sentence received
for commission of the new offense. In the event that the prisoner has been convicted
of more than one offense, post-incarceration supervision may be imposed if the
maximum sentence on all offenses has not been served.
Notwithstanding Section 23 of Chapter 279, where the defendant is sentenced to
the house of correction, the total term of incarceration for any offense plus
any additional commitment for violation of a condition or conditions of
post-incarceration supervision pursuant to section 17 of chapter 211G shall not
exceed the longest term fixed by law for the punishment of the crime of which
the prisoner has been convicted or if the defendant is serving a sentence after
being convicted of only one offense, two and one half years, whichever is less.
SECTION 17. Section 5 of chapter 211F of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2000 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting after the word “justice”, in line 3, the following words:— , the house and senate committees on ways and means.
SECTION 18. The General Laws are hereby amended by inserting after chapter 211F the following chapter:—
CHAPTER
211G.
SENTENCING GUIDELINES.
Section 1.
Definitions. As used in this chapter the following words shall have the
following meanings:—
“Adjudication of delinquency”, a determination or finding pursuant to section
58 of chapter 119 that a juvenile is a delinquent child.
“Conviction”, a finding or verdict of guilt for a criminal offense or an
adjudication as a youthful offender pursuant to section 58 of chapter 119.
“Criminal history group”, the classification of an offender’s previous record
of criminal convictions or adjudications of delinquency as set forth on the
horizontal axis of the sentencing guidelines grid.
“Departure from the guidelines”, a sentence imposed outside the sentencing
range contained in the applicable grid cell for the particular offense.
“Governing offense”, the offense having the highest offense seriousness level
among multiple offenses arising out of the same criminal conduct.
“Grid cell”, the intersection on the sentencing guidelines grid between the
offense seriousness level and the criminal history group.
“Intermediate sanction”, a nonincarcerative sentence, or portion thereof, which
includes a level of restriction, such as standard probation, intensive
supervision probation, community service, home confinement, and day reporting,
and which may be coupled with components, such as residential programming,
substance abuse treatment, restitution, continuing education, vocational
training, special education, and psychological counseling.
“Mandatory minimum sentence”, the provision of a criminal penalty for a
particular offense which specifies the minimum term of incarceration and
prohibits suspension of any sentence, placement on file, continuance without a
finding, probation, and release on parole until the minimum term of
imprisonment has been served.
“Master crime list”, the list in which offenses in Massachusetts
currently punishable by a term of imprisonment are ranked for purposes of the
sentencing guidelines.
“Offense seriousness levels”, the categories for ranking criminal offenses as
set forth in the master crime list and on the vertical axis of the sentencing
guidelines grid.
“Post-incarceration supervision”, a period of parole supervision to commence
upon a prisoner’s release from a sentence of imprisonment where the prisoner
has served the full sentence within a correctional facility.
“Same criminal conduct”, any 2 or more offenses committed during a single
criminal incident.
“Sentencing commission”, the Massachusetts sentencing commission as defined in section 1 of
chapter 211E.
“Sentencing event”, an appearance before a court of competent jurisdiction
during which sentence is imposed for 1 or more convictions or adjudications of
delinquency.
“Sentencing guidelines”, all provisions set forth in this chapter which direct
or guide judges in sentencing.
“Sentencing guidelines grid”, the sentencing matrix, with offenses classified
on a vertical axis and criminal history groups classified on a horizontal axis,
and which contains a sentencing guidelines range within each grid cell.
“Sentencing guidelines range”, the range of any sentence, including the range
of intermediate sanctions, which may be imposed in each grid cell without
constituting a departure from the sentencing guidelines.
“Split sentence”, a sentence to a house of correction which is suspended in
part and includes a specified period of incarceration followed by a specified
period of probation or intermediate sanction or both.
“Staircased offense”, a criminal offense which is ranked in more than 1 offense
seriousness level on the basis of the existence of a specified factor.
“Statutory minimum sentence”, the provision of a criminal penalty for a
particular offense which does not require the imposition of incarceration, but
specifies the minimum term of incarceration, when incarceration is imposed.
Section 2. There are established, consistent with the provisions of section 3
of chapter 211E, sentencing guidelines in the form of a sentencing guidelines
grid with offenses classified on the vertical axis according to seriousness and
criminal history classified on the horizontal axis according to severity.
Within each grid cell there is a sentencing guidelines range, consistent with
the provisions of subparagraph (c) of paragraph (3) of subsection (a) of
section 3 of said chapter 211E. The sentencing guidelines grid includes 3
sentencing guidelines zones:— (1) an incarceration zone, where only a sentence
to incarceration is within the sentencing guidelines range and a sentence to an
intermediate sanction constitutes a departure from the sentencing guidelines;
(2) a discretionary zone, where either a sentence to incarceration or a
sentence to an intermediate sanction are within the sentencing guidelines
range; and (3) an intermediate sanction zone, where only a sentence to an
intermediate sanction is within the sentencing guidelines range and a sentence
to incarceration constitutes a departure from the sentencing guidelines. The
following sentencing guidelines grid shall be used as a basis for sentencing
for convictions of all applicable offenses for which incarceration is a
possible sanction under existing statutes, except for those offenses with
mandatory minimum sentences listed in section 8.
|
|
Criminal History Group
|
|||||
|
Offense |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
|
Seriousness Level |
No/Minor Record |
Moderate Record |
Serious Record |
Violent or Repetitive |
Serious Violent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
Life |
Life |
Life |
Life |
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
120 -180 Mos |
135 - 203 Mos |
156-234 Mos. |
194-292 Mos. |
275-413 Mos. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
60 - 90 Mos. |
68 - 102 Mos. |
84 - 126 Mos. |
108 - 162 Mos. |
160 - 240 Mos. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
40 - 60 Mos. |
45 - 67 Mos. |
50 - 75 Mos. |
60 - 90 Mos. |
80 - 120 Mos. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
12 - 36 Mos. |
24 - 36 Mos. |
36 - 54 Mos. |
48 - 72 Mos. |
60 - 90 Mos. |
|
|
IS-IV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IS-III |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IS-II |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
0 - 24 Mos. |
3 - 30 Mos. |
6 - 30 Mos. |
20 - 30 Mos. |
24 - 36 Mos. |
|
|
IS-IV |
IS-IV |
IS-IV |
|
|
|
|
IS-III |
IS-III |
IS-III |
|
|
|
|
IS-II |
IS-II |
IS-II |
|
|
|
3 |
0 - 12 Mos. |
0 - 15 Mos. |
0 - 18 Mos. |
0 - 24 Mos. |
20-30 |
|
|
IS-IV |
IS-IV |
IS-IV |
IS-IV |
IS-IV |
|
|
IS-III |
IS-III |
IS-III |
IS-III |
IS-III |
|
|
IS-II |
IS-II |
IS-II |
IS-II |
IS-II |
|
|
IS-I |
IS-I |
IS-I |
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 - 6 Mos. |
0 - 6 Mos. |
0 - 9 Mos. |
0 - 12 Mos. |
|
|
|
|
|
IS-IV |
IS-IV |
|
|
IS-III |
IS-III |
IS-III |
IS-III |
IS-III |
|
|
IS-II |
IS-II |
IS-II |
IS-II |
IS-II |
|
|
IS-I |
IS-I |
IS-I |
IS-I |
IS-I |
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 - 3 Mos. |
0 - 6 Mos. |
|
|
|
|
|
IS-IV |
IS-IV |
|
|
|
IS-III |
IS-III |
IS-III |
IS-III |
|
|
IS-II |
IS-II |
IS-II |
IS-II |
IS-II |
|
|
IS-I |
IS-I |
IS-I |
IS-I |
IS-I |
|
Sentencing Guidelines Zones
|
|
|
Intermediate Sanctions Levels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incarceration Zone |
|
|
IS-IV 24-Hour Restriction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IS-III Daily Accountability |
|
|
|
Discretionary Zone |
|
|
IS-II Standard Supervision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IS-I Financial Accountability |
|
|
|
Intermediate Sanction Zone |
|
|
|
|
***Note: The numbers in each cell represent the range from which the judge selects the maximum sentence; the minimum sentence is 2/3rds of the maximum sentence and constitutes the initial parole eligibility date.
Section 3.
Offenses which permit incarceration are ranked according to offense seriousness
level. Murder, as defined in section 1 of chapter 265, is placed at the highest
level of the sentencing guidelines grid and for this offense the sentencing
provisions of section 2 of said chapter 265 apply. The offense seriousness
rankings are set forth in the following master crime list, which contains the
following information:—
(a) A “YES” in this column denotes application of the sentencing guidelines
grid. A “NO” in this column indicates the sentencing guideline grid is not
applicable, and an alternate penalty provision as provided for in this chapter
is applicable.
(b) All offenses on the master crime list are ranked according to seriousness.
For offenses to which the sentencing guidelines grid applies, the offense
seriousness level of the governing offense determines the placement of the
offender on the vertical axis.
For all offenses, the offense seriousness level also represents the level to
which a prior conviction is to be assigned for purposes of determining the
criminal history group.
(c) The following notes apply to certain offenses contained in the master crime
list:
(1) “Note A” refers to offenses where the sentencing guidelines range exceeds
the statutory maximum sentence in certain grid cells. In such circumstances,
the sentencing guidelines range applies, except that no sentence imposed may
exceed the statutory maximum sentence, as provided in section 9.
(2) “Note B” refers to offenses where the statutory minimum sentence exceeds
the sentencing guidelines range in certain grid cells. In such circumstances,
it is not a departure from the sentencing guidelines for a judge to impose a
sentence within the sentencing guidelines range, nor is it a departure from the
sentencing guidelines for a judge to impose the statutory minimum sentence, as
provided in paragraph (e) of said section 8.
(3) “Note C” refers to offenses with mandatory minimum sentences in violation
of chapter 94C. The sentencing guidelines for these offenses are set forth in
paragraph (c) of said section 8.
(4) “Note D” refers to certain firearms offenses and certain offenses
pertaining to operating a motor vehicle or boat under the influence which may
have mandatory minimum sentences. The sentencing guidelines for these offenses
are set forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of said section 8.
(5) “Note E” refers to certain other offenses which have mandatory minimum
sentences. The sentencing guidelines for these offenses are set forth in
paragraph (d) of said section 8.
(6) “Note F” refers to certain offenses for which a sentence to an intermediate
sanction constitutes a departure from the sentencing guidelines.
(7) “Note G” refers to staircased offenses. The staircase factors are described
in subsection (a) of section 4.
(8) “Note H” refers to offenses for which the criminal history group of the
defendant is enhanced as described in subsection (b) of said section 4.
(9) “Note I” refers to offenses for which the level is contingent on the level
assigned to the underlying substantive offense and is the same as the level
assigned to the underlying substantive offense, except that no sentence may
exceed the statutory maximum sentence, as provided in section 9.
(10) “Note J” refers to offenses for which the level is contingent on the level
assigned to the underlying substantive offense and is one level lower than the
level assigned to the underlying substantive offense, except that no sentence
may exceed the statutory maximum sentence, as provided in section 9.
(d) The General Law reference for a particular offense.
(e) The General Law reference for a particular offense penalty provision when
different from the offense reference.
(f) A specified factor, beyond the required elements for an offense, which
determines the offense seriousness level.
(g) The master crime list also incorporates information existing elsewhere in
the General Laws. Any discrepancies between the following items of information
reproduced in the master crime list and as they appear in the General Laws are
to be resolved in favor of those provisions of the General Laws which set forth
the penalties for the particular offense.
(1) “Offense” — an abbreviated offense description;
(2) “Penalty Type” — felony or misdemeanor;
(3) “Mandatory Time” — the mandatory minimum sentence, where applicable;
(4) “Min H/C” — the statutory minimum sentence to the house of correction,
where applicable;
(5) “Max H/C” — the statutory maximum sentence to the house of correction,
where applicable;
(6) “Min Prison” — the statutory minimum sentence to the state prison, where
applicable; and,
(7) “Max Prison” — the statutory maximum sentence to the state prison where
applicable.
Where an offense is not found in the master crime list, the judge shall impose
an appropriate sentence, having due regard for the purposes of sentencing set
forth in section 2 of chapter 211E. The master crime list follows:—
Section 4. (a) Certain offenses, broadly defined to encompass a wide range
of behavior, are placed at more than one offense seriousness level in the
master crime list. These offenses are identified by a staircased notation on
the master crime list based on the following considerations:—
(1) Manslaughter in violation of section 13 of chapter 265 is a level 8 offense
where it is voluntary manslaughter and a level 6 offense where it is
involuntary manslaughter.
(2) Assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon in violation of section
15A of chapter 265 is ranked according to the degree of injury to the victim as
follows:—
(i) Assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon is a level 6 offense
where there is significant injury to the victim. Significant injury includes:
injuries which are characterized by a protracted period of total disability or
long term impairment of function, loss of function of any body members, organ,
or mental faculty; injuries, not necessarily permanently disabling, which
require long term medical care or rehabilitative therapy; injuries which
involve a gross disfigurement; and, injuries which result in a permanent
residual disability or loss of function to a significant degree.
(ii) Assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon is a level 5 offense where there is moderate injury to the victim.
Moderate injury includes: injuries which involve extreme physical pain and some
discernible disability or loss of function of some body member, organ, or
mental faculty, such as fractures, internal injuries or wounds which are
serious but not life threatening; and, psychological trauma that results in
some temporary or partial disability.
(iii) Assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon is a level 4 offense where there is no injury or minor injury to
the victim. Minor injury includes: injuries which require some emergency
treatment, such as lacerations, contusions, or abrasions, which have no
residual effect; concussions without lasting neurological impact; physical
injuries that are painful and obvious but not in any way disabling; and,
minimal, psychological trauma without lasting effect.
(3) Armed robbery in violation of section 17 of chapter 265 is a level 7
offense where there is a display of a gun. Any other violation of section 17 of
chapter 265 is a level 6 offense with the exception of certain violations of
said section 17 of said chapter 265 that are subject to the provisions of
subsection (b) of section 4.
(4) Breaking and entering in violation of sections 16 to 18, inclusive, of
chapter 266 is a level 6 offense where the breaking and entering involves a
dwelling and the offender is armed. Breaking and entering is a level 5 offense
where the crime involves a dwelling and the offender is not armed, or where the
crime does not involve a dwelling and the offender is armed. Breaking and
entering a level 3 offense where the crime does not involve a dwelling and the
offender is not armed. Misdemeanor breaking and entering, section 16A of
chapter 266, is a level 2 offense.
(5) Certain property offenses are ranked according to the value of property
lost or destroyed as follows:—
(i) Where the value of the property lost or destroyed is $50,000 or over, the
offense is a level 5 offense.
(ii) Where the value of the property lost or destroyed is between $10,000 and
$50,000, the offense is a level 4 offense.
(iii) Where the value of the property lost or destroyed is $10,000 or under,
the offense is a level 3 offense.
In determining the appropriate offense seriousness level for a staircased
offense, the judge may consider any evidence received during the proceedings,
any victim impact statement, any presentence report when the judge requests
one, and, any other information that the judge deems credible.
(b) When a statute provides for a more severe penalty upon a second and
subsequent conviction for an offense, the second or subsequent offense is
elevated 1 level on the offense seriousness scale on the master crime list.
Where the offense is at level 8, the offender shall be moved over 1 cell to the
right to the next more serious criminal history group in the grid. When a
defendant is charged as a second or subsequent offender under the relevant
statute, the prior conviction or convictions that served as the basis for the
second or subsequent charge shall not be counted in determining criminal
history placement on the grid. Offenses that are subject to a more severe
penalty for second and subsequent conviction are so designated in the master
crime list.
Section 5. There are 5 criminal history groups on the horizontal axis of the
sentencing guidelines grid as follows:—
(a) Criminal history group A, no/minor record, refers to a criminal record that
contains no prior convictions of any kind; or, 1 to 3 prior convictions in any
combination for offenses in levels 1 or 2.
(b) Criminal history group B, moderate record, refers to a criminal record that
contains 4 or more prior convictions in any combination for offenses in level 1
or 2; or, 1 or 2 prior convictions in any combination for offenses in level 3
or 4.
(c) Criminal history group C, serious record, refers to a criminal record that
contains 3 to 5 prior convictions in any combination for offenses in level 3 or
4; or, 1 prior conviction for offenses in level 5 or 6.
(d) Criminal history group D, violent or repetitive record, refers to a
criminal record that contains 6 to 8 prior convictions in any combination for
offenses in level 3 or 4; or, 2 to 4 prior convictions in any combination for
offenses in level 5 or 6; or, 1 prior conviction for offenses in level 7 to 9,
inclusive.
(e) Criminal history group E, serious violent or serious repetitive record,
refers to a criminal record that contains 9 or more prior convictions for
offenses in level 3 or 4; or, 5 or more prior convictions for offenses in level
5 or 6; or, 2 or more prior convictions in any combination for offenses in
level 7 to 9, inclusive.
Section 6. In determining placement in the appropriate criminal history group
on the sentencing guidelines grid, the following provisions shall apply:—
(a) Only those prior offenses which resulted in a conviction shall be counted
for criminal history placement on the sentencing guidelines grid. All
convictions that occurred prior to the present sentencing event shall be
counted for criminal history placement on the sentencing guidelines grid. The
offense seriousness level of each prior conviction shall be determined by
reference to the version of the master crime list in effect at the time of the
sentencing event for the present offense.
(b) Multiple prior convictions arising from the same criminal conduct shall be
counted as one prior conviction, based on the most serious offense. There shall
be a rebuttable presumption that multiple prior convictions that have the same
arraignment date shall be counted as 1 prior conviction, based on the most
serious offense. Multiple convictions with the same arraignment date may each
be counted separately for purposes of criminal history placement on the
sentencing guidelines grid where each such conviction is not part of the same
criminal conduct. Multiple convictions with different arraignment dates may be
counted as a single conviction for purposes of criminal history placement on
the sentencing guidelines grid where each such conviction was part of the same
criminal conduct.
(c) Adjudications of delinquency for offenses classified in offense seriousness
levels 5 through 9, inclusive, on the master crime list shall be considered as
convictions of the offenses involved and counted for purposes of criminal
history. Adjudications of delinquency for offenses classified below level 5
shall not be counted for purposes of criminal history, but the existence of
such adjudications may be considered as an aggravating factor for departure
from the sentencing guidelines range.
(d) Prior convictions in federal and other jurisdictions shall be counted for
criminal history purposes. The offense of prior conviction shall be assigned to
the same offense seriousness level as the Massachusetts offense in the master
crime list with the same or substantially the same elements.
(e) Where the prior conviction is a staircased offense and the offense
seriousness level of the staircased offense is not apparent from the criminal
record, there is a rebuttable presumption that the prior conviction is in the
lowest staircased level for that offense in the master crime list.
(f) The judge shall decide any material contested issues relating to criminal
history.
Section 7. Sentencing pursuant to the sentencing guidelines grid shall be based
on the offense or offenses of conviction and the criminal history of the
defendant. The offense seriousness level for each offense of conviction shall
be determined from the master crime list. The appropriate level of staircased
offenses shall be determined by taking into account the relevant staircasing
factors set forth herein. The number and types of prior convictions shall be
determined in accordance with section 5 of this chapter to determine the
appropriate criminal history group for the offender. The sentencing guidelines
range shall be determined by identifying that grid cell where the seriousness
level of the governing offense on the vertical axis intersects with the
classification of the criminal history group on the horizontal axis.
(a) The sentencing judge may impose a sentence to incarceration within the
sentencing guidelines range by imposing a maximum sentence from within the
guideline range of the appropriate grid cell. Unless otherwise noted herein, the
minimum sentence will always be two-thirds of the maximum sentence and will
establish the initial parole eligibility date. The sentencing judge shall state
both the maximum sentence and the parole eligibility date at the time of
sentencing. This applies to all sentences of incarceration of 2 months or
longer to houses of correction and all sentences to the state prison. Where the
maximum sentence of incarceration to a house of correction is less than 2
months, the minimum sentence need not be two-thirds of the maximum sentence.
Where the maximum sentence is selected from the guideline range in the
applicable grid cell, the sentence will be within the guidelines and no written
explanation is necessary.
(b) The sentencing judge may impose a sentence above or below the sentencing
guidelines range where the court finds, based on
clear and convincing evidence at the time of sentencing, that one or more
aggravating or mitigating circumstances exist as provided in this chapter and
that those circumstances constitute substantial and compelling reasons for
departure. The sentencing judge shall set forth in writing reasons for
departing from that range on a sentencing statement, consistent with the
provisions of subsection (h) of chapter 211E. In imposing a sentence of
incarceration that departs from the sentencing guidelines range, the minimum
sentence shall be two-thirds of the maximum sentence. A sentence that departs
below the sentencing guidelines range may include a sentence to any lesser term
of incarceration or any intermediate sanction. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, it shall not constitute a departure for a judge to impose the
statutory maximum sentence on any defendant in Criminal History Group E.
(1) The following exclusive mitigating and aggravating circumstances shall
guide departures from the sentencing guidelines range. The presence of any such
circumstance may warrant departure from the sentencing guidelines range in the
discretion of the sentencing judge. In determining mitigation or aggravation,
the judge may consider any evidence received during the proceedings; any victim
impact statement; any presentence report, when the judge requests one; and, any
other information that the judge deems credible.
(A) The exclusive list of mitigating circumstances is as follows:—
(1) The defendant was a minor participant in the criminal conduct.
(2) The defendant was suffering from a mental or physical condition that
significantly reduced the culpability of the defendant for the offense.
(3) The victim was an initiator, aggressor, or provoker of the offense.
(4) The sentence was imposed in accordance with a jointly agreed
recommendation.
(5) The age of the defendant at the time of the offense.
(6) The defendant verifies current involvement in, or successful completion of,
a substance abuse or other treatment program that began after the date of the
offense.
(7) Not later than the time of the sentencing hearing, the defendant has
truthfully provided to the prosecution all information and evidence the
defendant has concerning the offense or offenses that were part of the same
course of conduct or of a common scheme or plan, but the fact that the
defendant has no relevant or useful other information to provide or that the
prosecution is already aware of the information shall not preclude a
determination by the court that this constitutes a mitigating circumstance.
The sentencing judge shall be required to conduct a hearing in determining
aggravating or mitigating factors. (B) The exclusive list of aggravating
circumstances is as follows:—
(1) The victim was especially vulnerable due to age or physical or mental
disability.
(2) The victim was treated with particular cruelty.
(3) The defendant used position or status to facilitate commission of the
offense, such as a position of trust, confidence or fiduciary relationship.
(4) The defendant was a leader in the commission of an offense involving two or
more criminal actors.
(5) The defendant committed the offense while on probation, on parole, or
during escape.
(6) The defendant has committed repeated offenses against the same victim.
(7) The defendant has committed the offense: (i) to intimidate or coerce a
civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by
intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by
assassination or kidnapping.
The sentencing judge shall be required to conduct a hearing in determining
aggravating or mitigating factors.
(c) When a defendant is convicted of multiple offenses arising out of the same
criminal conduct, the judge may impose concurrent or consecutive sentences,
subject to the following provisions. The judge shall impose a consecutive
sentence when the imposition of a consecutive sentence is required by the terms
of the statute pertaining to a particular offense. The judge may impose
concurrent or consecutive sentences of incarceration in the house of correction
or the state prison for each offense where such incarceration is permitted by
law, subject to the following limitation. The judge may impose consecutive
sentences to the state prison or the house of correction by selecting a
sentence from the guidelines range in the applicable grid cell for each offense
to be sentenced consecutively. Any sentence imposed as concurrent or
consecutive to a governing offense may be for a period of incarceration, or for
a period of probation, which is less than the lower limit of the sentencing
guidelines range contained in the applicable grid cell or for any level of
intermediate sanction, without constituting a departure from the sentencing
guidelines.
When a defendant is convicted of multiple offenses which arise out of the same
criminal conduct and there is a single or no victim, the total of the
consecutive sentence imposed may not exceed the upper limit range of the
sentencing guidelines range in the grid cell of the governing offense. Where
the total exceeds the upper limit, it shall be considered a departure from the
guidelines and the judge is required to provide written reasons.
When a defendant is convicted of multiple offenses which arise out of the same
criminal conduct and there are multiple victims, the total of the consecutive
sentence imposed may not exceed two times the upper limit range of the
sentencing guidelines range in the grid cell of the governing offense. Where
the total exceeds two times the upper limit, it shall be considered a departure
from the guidelines and the judge is required to provide written reasons.
Any court which accepts a plea of guilty or an admission to sufficient facts,
to a criminal offense, and the term of incarceration for that offense is
subject to a period of post-incarceration supervision pursuant to section
seventeen of chapter 211G, shall inform the defendant who is offering the plea,
prior to acceptance, that such plea shall result in the defendant being subject
to post-conviction supervision under the provision of that section.
Failure to inform the defendant that his plea may result in his being subject
to post-incarceration supervision under the provisions of that section shall
not be grounds to vacate or invalidate the
plea.
Section 8. Sentencing guidelines for offenses with mandatory minimum terms are
as follows:—
(a) No departures below the mandatory minimum sentences for firearms offenses
in violation of paragraph (a), (c) or (d) of section 10 or section 10E of
chapter 269 are permitted. These enumerated mandatory firearms offenses are not
integrated into the guidelines grid. The sentencing guidelines for these
mandatory firearms offenses are the mandatory sentencing provisions of the
existing statutes. The minimum term of incarceration shall be no less than the
mandatory minimum sentence provided in said paragraph (a), (c) or (d) of said
section 10 or said section 10E of said chapter 269. The sentencing judge is
required to impose a minimum and a maximum sentence, but the minimum sentence
need not be two-thirds of the maximum. For purposes of determining the criminal
history group for a defendant with prior mandatory firearms convictions, the
master crime list provides the offense seriousness level corresponding to the
sentencing guidelines grid for each firearms offense with a mandatory minimum
sentence.
(b) For purposes of this chapter, operating under the influence offenses refer
to offenses enumerated in the second paragraph of section 23 of chapter 90,
subparagraph (1) of paragraph (a) of subdivision (1) of section 24 of said
chapter 90, and subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of section
8 of chapter 90B. No departures below any mandatory minimum sentences for
operating under the influence offenses are permitted. These operating under the
influence offenses are not integrated into the guidelines grid. The sentencing
guidelines for these operating under the influence offenses are the mandatory
sentencing provisions of the existing statutes. The minimum term of
incarceration shall be no less than any mandatory minimum sentence provided in
said subparagraph (1) of paragraph (a) of subdivision (1) of said section 24 of
said chapter 90 and said subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of
said section 8 of said chapter 90B.The sentencing judge is required to impose a
minimum and a maximum sentence, but the minimum sentence need not be two-thirds
of the maximum.
For purposes of determining the criminal history group for a defendant with
prior convictions for operating under the influence offenses, the master crime
list provides the offense seriousness level for each operating under the
influence offense.
Nothing in this section shall be found to prohibit a sentence pursuant to
subparagraph (4) of said paragraph (a) of said subdivision (1) of said section
24 of said chapter 90 or said subparagraph (A) of paragraph (3) of said
subsection (a) of said section 8 of said chapter 90B.
(c) Offenses in violation of the controlled substances act.
(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in the case of an offense under
paragraph (c) of section 32A, clauses (2) and (3) of paragraph (a), clauses
(1) and (2) of paragraph (b), clauses (1) and (2) of paragraph (c) of section
32E and section 32J of chapter 94C, the court may impose a sentence pursuant to
the sentencing guidelines without regard to any mandatory minimum sentence that
might otherwise apply, if the court finds at sentencing that the following
mitigating circumstances apply. The following is the exclusive list of
mitigating conditions:
(1) the criminal history of the defendant falls in criminal history group A or
B in the sentencing guidelines grid;
(2) the defendant has no prior drug distribution and trafficking convictions;
(3) the defendant did not use violence or credible threats of violence or
possess a firearm or other dangerous weapon, or induce another participant to
do so, in connection with the offense;
(4) the offense did not result in the death or serious bodily injury to any
person;
(5) the defendant is a minor participant in the manufacture, distribution or
sale of controlled substances;
(6) the defendant is not charged with an offense involving minors.
In addition to the above conditions, the burden is on the defendant to prove
the mitigating factors by clear and convincing evidence. The sentencing judge
must find any proven factors constitute a substantial reason to depart from a
mandatory minimum sentence. The commonwealth must be provided notice, the
opportunity to be heard, and the right to appeal. The departure hearing will be
conducted after conviction has been entered, after trial or a plea.
The judge may not depart below the sentencing guidelines after he has departed
from the mandatory minimum scheme. If the appropriate grid box contains a
sentencing option of incarceration or intermediate sanctions, the court must
impose incarceration. The statute will not apply to any crime committed before
the date that the guidelines become effective.
Where the judge departs below the mandatory minimum sentence and imposes an
incarceration sentence within the guidelines range, the minimum sentence shall
be two-thirds of the maximum sentence; the defendant shall be eligible for
parole at the expiration of the minimum sentence; and, the defendant shall be
eligible for earned good time, work release, and other pre-release programs
deemed appropriate by the correctional authority with custody responsibility,
notwithstanding the provisions of section 32H of chapter 94C.
Where the judge does not depart below the mandatory minimum sentence the
minimum sentence need not be two-thirds of the maximum.
(d) No departures below any mandatory minimum sentence provided for in these
enumerated sections are permitted. As set forth in the master crime list,
violations of subsection (a) of section 24G of chapter 90, subsection (1) of
section 8B of chapter 90B, sections 4B and 6 of chapter 272 are level 6
offenses; violations of subsections (b) and (c) of section 43 of chapter 265,
and section 4A of chapter 272 are level 5 offenses; violations of section 4A of
chapter 272, subdivision (1) of section 24L of chapter 90, subsection (1) of
section 8A of chapter 90B, section 27A and subsection (a) of section 28 of
chapter 266, section 39 of chapter 268, and section 7 of chapter 272 are level
4 offenses.
The minimum term of incarceration shall be no less than the mandatory minimum
sentence provided in the statutes enumerated in this paragraph. The sentencing
judge is required to impose a minimum and a maximum sentence, but the minimum
sentence need not be two-thirds of the maximum.
The defendant shall be eligible for parole at the expiration of the minimum
sentence. The defendant shall not be eligible for earned good time, work
release, and other pre-release programs deemed appropriate by the correctional
authority with custody responsibility, until the defendant has served the
mandatory minimum sentence.
(e) For those offenses with a statutory minimum sentence, it shall not be
considered a departure for the judge to impose a sentence within the sentencing
guidelines range, even though the sentence may be below the statutory minimum
sentence. Where the statutory minimum sentence exceeds the sentencing
guidelines range, the imposition of the statutory minimum sentence shall not
constitute a departure from the sentencing guidelines.
Section 9. Notwithstanding paragraph (c) of section 3 of chapter 211E, a judge
may impose any sentence which exceeds the statutory maximum term set forth in
the statute that establishes the penalty for the particular offense; provided
the sentence does not exceed the guidelines range. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, it shall not constitute a departure for a judge to impose the
statutory maximum sentence on any defendant in Criminal History Group E.
Section 10. When a district or municipal court judge is imposing a sentence and
the sentencing guidelines range in the applicable grid cell exceeds the
district and municipal court sentencing jurisdiction of two and one-half years,
the sentencing guidelines range shall be an incarceration zone range of 20 to
30 months and it shall not constitute a departure from the sentencing
guidelines for a district or municipal court judge to impose a sentence of
incarceration from within the 20 to 30 month sentencing guidelines range.
Section 11. Guidelines for sentencing to intermediate sanctions, as defined in
section 1 of chapter 211F, are integrated into the sentencing guidelines grid
in the discretionary zone or the intermediate sanctions zone as described in
section 2.
There are 4 levels of intermediate sanctions consistent with the severity of
the restrictions on personal liberty and the intensity of supervision. The 4
levels of intermediate sanctions are integrated as follows:—
(1) Level 1, financial accountability, which represents the level of
restriction and accountability that is typically associated with administrative
probation. It is primarily designed to monitor the timely payment of
restitution, fines, victim/witness fees, and the like, by the offender.
(2) Level 2, standard probation supervision, under which the offender is
subject to weekly accountability of his whereabouts. This represents the level
of restriction and accountability that is typically associated with standard
probation supervision.
(3) Level 3, daily accountability, under which the offender is subject to daily
accountability of his whereabouts. Level 3 sanctions may include, but are not
limited to, electronic monitoring, daily reporting, reporting on demand,
special curfew supervision, and intensive probation supervision. This
represents the level of restriction and accountability that falls in between 24
hour restriction and standard probation.
(4) Level 4, 24 hour restriction, under which the defendant is subject to 24
hour restriction and accountability of his whereabouts. Level 4 sanctions may
include, but are not limited to, a placement in a halfway house, inpatient
alcohol and drug treatment facility, home confinement, electronic monitoring
and daily reporting. This represents the maximum level or restriction and
accountability short of incarceration.
A sentence to an intermediate sanction shall be imposed as a condition of
probation, consistent with the provisions of paragraph (c) of section 3 of
chapter 211F. Conditions of probation, including, but not limited to, random
drug and alcohol testing, substance abuse counseling, financial restitution and
the payment of fines are available at every level. The length of the probation
period that may be imposed upon conviction shall be consistent with the
provisions of section 87 of chapter 276. The sentencing judge shall specify the
intermediate sanction level. The supervising probation officer has the
discretion to move a probation down in level or levels in appropriate
circumstances, without judicial consultation, consistent with any special conditions
or duration of probation specified by the judge. A reduction in the
intermediate sanction level by a probation officer shall not go below the
guideline levels set forth in the grid cell in which the offender was
sentenced.
Section 12. The sentencing guidelines do not apply to a probation revocation
hearing. In imposing a sentence at a probation revocation hearing, the judge
has the discretion to impose any sentence up to the statutory maximum. When
imposing a sentence of incarceration, the judge shall impose both a minimum
sentence and a maximum sentence and the minimum sentence must be two-thirds of
the maximum sentence.
Section 13. A sentence to a house of correction shall not be suspended in
whole, but a sentence to a house of correction may be suspended in part to
permit the imposition of a split sentence. In imposing a split sentence, a
judge shall impose a minimum and a maximum term as provided by paragraph (a) of
section 6 and shall specify the period of incarceration to be served in the house
of correction. The judge shall also specify the term of probation to be served
subsequent to the period of incarceration.
Section 14. When appropriate, a judge shall order fines or restitution or both
as part of any sentence. Restitution to the victim shall be a priority of the
judge at the time of sentencing, regardless of whether the offender is
incarcerated.
Section 15. In sentencing a defendant after trial or after acceptance of a
guilty plea pursuant to either Rule 12 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure or
Rule 4(c) of the District/Municipal Court Rules of Criminal Procedure, the
court shall comply with the provisions of Rule 28 of the Massachusetts Rules of
Criminal Procedure. The judge shall allow both parties to be heard at
sentencing on all sentencing issues. In determining the sentence, the judge may
rely on any evidence received during the proceedings; any victim impact
statement; any presentence report, when the judge requests one; and, any other
information the judge deems credible. A sentencing statement shall be completed
in accordance with paragraph (h) of section 3 of chapter 211E for each
defendant being sentenced. The sentencing judge shall sign the completed
sentencing statement and a copy shall be submitted to the Sentencing Commission
as provided in paragraph (h) of said section 3 of said chapter 211E.
Section 16. The defendant or the commonwealth may appeal a sentence imposed
pursuant to sentencing guidelines, to the extent an appeal is permitted in
accordance with the provisions of section 4 of chapter 211E. If an appeal or
application is taken by the Commonwealth, the court, upon written motion of the
defendant supported by affidavit, shall determine and approve the payment to
the defendant of his or her costs of appeal together with reasonable attorney’s
fees to be paid on the order of the court upon the entry of the appellate
decision in favor of the defendant.
SECTION 19. The sentencing commission established by chapter 432 of the acts of 1993 shall monitor the implementation of the sentencing guidelines for a period of 3 years after the effective date of this act. The sentencing commission shall review the application of the concurrent or consecutive sentencing provisions and the mandatory sentences in the prosecution of controlled substances for fair application of said sections consistent with the spirit and intent of this act.
SECTION 20. The provisions of this act shall take effect on _____________, 2003 and the sentencing guidelines and other related provisions contained herein shall apply to all felonies and misdemeanors committed on or after said date. All offenses committed prior to _____________, 2003 shall be governed by the laws, including, but not limited to, those on sentencing, parole, and probation, in effect at the time the offense is committed.