0010 7230 82 (Sept. 16, 2014) – The claimant’s re-appointment letter was not reasonable assurance of reemployment as a long-term substitute teacher for the following academic term, because the letter did not offer a specific position and the claimant had to affirmatively apply for posted positions. The offer was a mere possibility of reemployment and nothing more.
BR-121907-A (July 31, 2012) - Under G.L. c. 151A, § 28A, an on-call substitute teacher who worked during the spring academic term was not entitled to benefits over the summer, because she had reasonable assurance of reemployment as an on-call substitute teacher under the same economic terms and conditions for the fall. It makes no difference that she had worked very few days during the spring term.
BR-117509-A (Mar. 27, 2012) - If an on-call substitute teacher receives reasonable assurance to work as a substitute teacher for any school employer in the fall, he is precluded under G.L. c. 151A, § 28A from collecting benefits during the summer based upon any of the wages that he earned from substitute teaching.
BR-109037-OP (Aug. 4, 2009) -- Claimant laid off from a full-time teacher position during the base period subsequently worked as an on-call substitute with reasonable assurance of returning to work as a substitute after summer vacation. Because the entire base period employment is considered; not just the last job before summer break, she was eligible for benefits based upon the full-time teacher wages.
People also viewed...
You recently viewed...
Personalization is OFF. Your personal browsing history at Mass.gov is not visible because your personalization is turned off. To view your history, turn your personalization on.
Learn more on our .
*Recommendations are based on site visitor traffic patterns and are not endorsements of that content.