0014 5343 84 (June 29, 2015) – A unilateral reduction in claimant’s weekly draw against commission by more than half or the fact that the employer may have violated a state wage and hour law does not relieve the claimant of the obligation to make adequate and reasonable attempts to preserve his job or to show that such efforts would have been futile. [Note: This case is currently on appeal in the District Court.]
0002 2560 79 (Nov. 12, 2013) – Claimant’s failure to make efforts to preserve her employment rendered her ineligible for benefits under G.L. c. 151A, § 25(e)(1), where she could have done so simply by asking the employer owner not to address her using foul language.
BR-111647 (Sept. 28, 2010) – When an employee makes his concerns about changes to the terms and conditions of employment known to his immediate supervisor, who then responds repeatedly that nothing will be done to address them, the claimant has done enough to preserve his employment.