-
Luke Beckwith v. Willowood of Pittsfield
December 1, 2000
Heart Atack - additional medical evidence needed because § 11A report wasn't sufficient -
Stephen Devaney v. Webster Engineering
December 1, 2000
Termination of the § 34 was erroneous -
Halina Sawicka v. Archdiocese of Boston
December 1, 2000
Judge properly credited the employee's testimony and adopted the § 11A opinion based on history consistent with the judge's findings, that the employee's incapacity was causally related to the 1995 aggravation. -
Ana DeJesus v. Morgan Goodwill Industries
December 14, 2000
Employee contends the AJ erred in finding employee capable of performed remunerative work and, therefore, awarding a closed period of § 35 and § 34 benefits. -
Paul Franklin v. Banner Truck Leasing Co.
December 21, 2000 -
Theresa Canavan v. Brigham & Women's Hospital
December 26, 2000
Lanigan Analysis -
Angelo Resendes v. John Healy & Co.
December 26, 2000 -
Leeanne M. Studzinksi v. FM Kuzmeskus, Inc.
December 29, 2000 -
Roger H. Piekarski v. National Non-Wovens
December 29, 2000
The Official Website of the Executive Office of Labor and Workforce Development (EOLWD)
