Home

Featured Webinar

Operating Under the Influence - Not Guilty After Trial. How to Argue Against Automatic License Restoration
Monday, March 5, 2012, 1:15-1:35pm

A defendant charged with Chapter 90, §24 operating under the influence is found not guilty after trial and immediately files a motion to reinstate his suspended license under Chapter 90, § 24 (1) (f) (1).  Is there anything a prosecutor can do to prevent the judge from ordering the defendant’s license be reinstated?  Yes!

Andrea Nardone, MDAA’s Vehicular Crimes Staff Attorney, will walk you through the language of Chapter 90, §24(1) (f) (1), which provides a rebuttable presumption that the defendant’s suspended license be restored unless the Commonwealth  establishes that license restoration would likely endanger the safety of the public. This webinar will help police and prosecutors better understand that the Commonwealth does have a say in whether a defendant’s license is restored and how to persuade the court that the facts of your case demonstrate the risk he poses to public safety despite the finding of not guilty on the underlying charge.

Reserve your Webinar seat now at:
https://www3.gotomeeting.com/register/396828870