| |
Interior Forest
- October 2009
OVERVIEW
The Massachusetts
Division of Fisheries and Wildlife interior forest GIS dataset identifies extensively forested
portions of the Massachusetts landscape where forest cover is
relatively un-fragmented by human development. Other natural
features such as wetlands and open water are included in this dataset
as non-fragmenting features. The dataset was initially developed by DFW
with input from The Nature Conservancy for use by Massachusetts state
agencies to facilitate the selection of forest reserves on state-owned
lands in the Commonwealth, and subsequently has been used by DFW when
evaluating parcels of land for potential public acquisition. The
dataset has no regulatory associations or intentions and is subjective
in nature.
Although the initial data analysis for this data layer has been
completed, land use changes continually and this data layer is
therefore considered to be under development.
Notice:
The Interior Forest data layer is currently based on the 1999 MassGIS
Land Use data layer. An updated analysis is underway to incorporate the
2005 MassGIS Land Use data layer and more recent infrastructure data
layers.
MassGIS stores and distributes the layer as INTERIORFOREST_POLY.
|
SOURCE DATA and PRODUCTION
The
dataset was created using the Massachusetts Highway Department Roads
data (2003), MassGIS Land Use data (1999), and Boston Transportation
Planning Organization's Trains data (2004). Land use classes considered
natural features were extracted and converted to a new coverage,
including forest, wetland, and open water. Although wetlands and open
water are not considered interior forest, in most cases they were
considered non-fragmenting natural features in a landscape context and
were left in for the initial analysis. Roads were separated into three
classes: class 1 roads were buffered at 1000m, classes 2,3,4,7 were
buffered at 300 m, and classes 5 and 6 were buffered at 100 m. Rail
lines were buffered at 300 m. Fragmenting buffer widths were based
partially on work done by The Nature Conservancy, Boston Office
(Forman, R.T.T., and R.D. Deblinger. 2000. The Ecological Road-Effect
Zone of a Massachusetts, USA Suburban Highway. Conservation Biology
14:36-46). All fragmenting land use categories were extracted,
converted to a new coverage, and buffered at 300m. The road, trains,
and fragmenting land use buffers were then merged into the
non-fragmenting natural features. Once complete, the buffers were
extracted and deleted from the coverage, leaving polygons considered to
be "interior natural features." Clean and build functions were then run
to eliminate sliver polygons and artificial boundaries, such as town
lines, that split areas of interior natural areas. Wetland and open
water polygons were left in the dataset to keep data analysis
flexibility for conservation uses. The coverage was then converted to
shapefile format for distribution.
The first update (version 1.1) consisted of the removal of additional
artificial separations between interior forest polygons, such as a town
boundary that split an interior forest block into two separate
polygons. All interior forest polygons were selected and converted to a
new shapefile. The new shapefile was then put in edit mode, and all
polygons were unioned in arcview 3.2 to make one single polygon. The
new polygon was visually checked to be sure errors were removed. Then
the xtools function was used to convert the multpart polygon to
separate polygons. The number of interior forest polygons was reduced
from 5,466 (599,759 ac total) to 5,213 (599,902 ac total). The increase
in acres may be due to the reduction of gaps between forested polygons.
A second update (version 1.2) to the interior forest layer was
undertaken in June, 2008. The prior drafts allowed wetlands and
water bodies to "split" forest blocks into smaller blocks of
forest. We wanted areas of contiguous forest and wetland/water
body to remain as one "natural block". The following steps were
taken to improve the interior forest shapefile in that way: 1) All
directly adjacent polygons (3,4,14,and 20) from intfor_v1_1.shp were
dissolved into "natural blocks" regardless of the land use type. 2) All
polygons less than 50 acres were then removed from the resulting
shapefile. 3) Several statistics were generated at the "natural block"
level and are preserved as attributes in the interior forest
shapefile. Please see the attribute metadata for details. 4) Then
unioned the wetlands and waterbodies back into the shapefile (4, 14,
and 20). This allowed us to calculate the acres in each block
that were not forested and isolate those non-forested polygons.
The union also kept the forested portion of each natural block as one
polygon or multi-part polygon, even if the wetlands/water bodies split
the forested portion. This was a good use of multi-part polygons
and we have preserved that data structure in the current shapefile. 5)
We finally removed all of the natural blocks that had less than 50
acres of forest present in the natural block. For instance, if
the total area was 200 acres broken down into 160 acres of
wetland/water body and 40 acres of forest, we removed both the forested
and wetland/water body portions of the natural block. 6) Several
additional attributes were added after the union of wetland and water
body polygons into the shapefile. See the attribute descriptions
for details.
Selection of the lower threshold of 50 acres was informed by a quick
review of minimum interior forest patch size requirements online. While
not regionally appropriate, in Southern Ontario, patches of 200
hectares (roughly 500 acres) are thought to be the minimum size for a
forest ecosystem to recover from disturbance events such as hurricanes
(wind-throw), fires, or insect/disease infestations (Forest
Fragmentation Fact Sheet, Federation of Ontario Naturalists,
http://www.ontarionature.org). This threshold seemed high given that some
interior forest species, such as the Scarlet Tanager have sliding
requirements of minimum forested patch size. They can occur in patches
as small as 21 acres if the surrounding landscape is at least 70%
forested. This minimum patch size quickly increases as the overall
percent of forest decreases in the landscape. In a landscape that is
60, 50, and 40% forested the minimum patch size is 62, 172, and 476
acres respectively (Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Improving
Habitat for Scarlet Tanager and other Forest-interior birds, Atlantic
Coast Region,
http://www.birds.cornell.edu/conservation/tanager/atlantic.html). The
selection of the 50 acre threshold lies in the lower portion of the
range for this species.
Finally, resulting polygons were intersected with Harvard Forest’s data
layer of Known 1830s forest polygons and with parcels protected by a
Massachusetts state conservation agency from the February 2008 MassGIS
Open Space data layer to generate acreages for those two related
resource values for each interior forest polygon.
ATTRIBUTES
The datalayer's polygon attribute table has
the following items:
| ITEM NAME |
|
WIDTH |
|
TYPE |
|
DESCRIPTION |
| LEVEL1_ID |
|
4 |
|
I |
|
An ID that uniquely identifies each contiguous "natural block" of forest, wetland, and water bodies. |
| LEV1_ACRES |
|
19 |
|
F |
|
Total acres in each "natural block" |
| LEV1_PERIM |
|
19 |
|
F |
|
Perimeter (meters) of each natural block |
| LEV1_SQ_M |
|
19 |
|
F |
|
Area (square meters) of each natural block |
| LEV1_AP_RA |
|
19 |
|
F |
|
Area to perimeter ratio in each natural block |
| ACRES_1830 |
|
19 |
|
F |
|
Acres of known 1830s forest present in each natural |
| ACRES_FOR |
|
19 |
|
F |
|
Acres of forest present in each natural block |
| NMLD_ACRES |
|
19 |
|
F |
|
An index value between 0 and 1 that normalizes the total
acres in each natural block. Calculated by taking the acres in each
natural block and dividing it by the acres in the largest natural block in
the state. |
| NMLD_APRA |
|
19 |
|
F |
|
An index value between 0 and 1 that normalizes the area
to perimeter values in each natural block. Calculated by taking the AP
value in each natural block and dividing it by the largest AP ratio out of
all the natural blocks (the most evenly shaped). |
| NMLD_1830 |
|
19 |
|
F |
|
An index value between 0 and 1 that normalizes the 1830s
forest in each natural block. Calculated by taking the acres of 1830s
forest in each natural block and dividing it by the acreage of 1830s forest
in the block that has the most 1830s forest. |
| NMLD_FOR |
|
19 |
|
F |
|
An index value between 0 and 1 that normalizes the acres
of forest in each natural block. Calculated by taking the acres of
forest in each natural block and dividing it by the acres of forest in the
block in the state with the largest amount of forest. |
| LU99_CODE |
|
5 |
|
I |
|
Land use code for each polygon (3 = forest, 4 = wetland, 14 = salt wetland, 20 = open water) |
| LEV2_ACRES |
|
19 |
|
F |
|
Acreage in each polygon after the wetland and water body
polygons were unioned back into the shapefile. Each wetland and water
body is a distinct polygon. If a wetland or water body split a natural
block the remaining forested portions are all part of one multi-part polygon. |
| ST_PROT_AC |
|
19 |
|
F |
|
Acres
of forest in each natural block that are protected by state
conservation agencies (DFG or DCR fee ownership or DFG or DCR CR
holding) |
| UNPR_RATIO |
|
19 |
|
F |
|
(ACRES_FOR - ST_PROT_ACRES)/ACRES_FOR |
| FOR_RATIO |
|
19 |
|
F |
|
ACRES_FOR/LEVEL1_AC |
MAINTENANCE
DFW maintains the layer and will provide any updates to MassGIS.
Last Updated 11/19/2009
Site Policies
|
|