| |
January
6, 1998 - Boston, MA
"ENVIRONMENTAL GIS APPLICATIONS"
The following sections provide brief summaries, in outline form, of the
main points presented by the listed speakers at the January 6, 1998 meeting
of the Massachusetts Geographic Information Council (MGIC).
Moderator - Christian Jacqz, GIS Manager, MassGIS
Presentation by Paul Penner, GIS Specialist,
Metropolitan District Commission, Division of Watershed Management
"GIS Based Land Acquisition Model"
Abstract: Paul describes the Land Acquisition Priority model that the MDC's
Watershed Division developed and implemented in GIS. This model used
pairwise comparison of factors to derive a weighting scheme which is used
with a variety of GIS layers in prioritizing land protection efforts in
the metro Boston Watershed.
Overview of Presentation
-
Land Acquisition History, Goals, and Program Scope
-
Need for Model and Process of Model Development
-
Technical Overview of Model
-
Use of Model
Division of Watershed Management: Mission
“...utilize and conserve...water and other natural resources in order
to protect, preserve and enhance the environment of the Commonwealth and
to assure the availability of pure water for future generations.” Chapter
372, Acts of 1984 .
Overview of the Wachusett Reservoir Watershed
Land Acquisition Goals:
-
Acquire land in order of priority of importance for watershed protection
-
acquire land where development may adversely affect the water supply
-
acquire land to restore past land use impacts
-
encourage preservation of less critical land
Program History and Future
-
From 1985 to 1997, MDC has acquired 10,000 acres of land on its three active
watersheds at a cost of 70 million dollars.
-
At Wachusett watershed, MDC has spent more than 50 million dollars since
1990, with 32 million spent there in the past three years.
-
MDC has 90 million dollars left in its land acquisition bond.
Selection Criteria in 1980’s
-
Initial purchases were easily targeted at the Stillwater and Quinapoxet
Corridors, where 90% of the reservoir inflow originates. The Stillwater
basin accounts for 10% of the whole system yield, contains most of the
watershed’s aquifers, and was zoned commercially.
Extent of MDC Holdings on the Wachusett Reservoir Watershed in 1985
Too Complicated for Intuition Alone
-
With 16,000 different ownerships in the watershed and more than 25 criteria
for acquisition originally identified by staff, a model is needed to give
the program direction.
Extent of MDC Holdings on the Wachusett Reservoir Watershed April 1997
Model Development
-
Model has gone through four versions in 3 years.
-
Current model uses 12 weighted criteria and 3 weighted zones within the
watershed.
-
Criteria and zone “weights” arrived at using “pairwise comparison” and
the Analytical Hierarchy Process
GIS General Information
-
What is GIS?
-
Mapping linked to database with analytic capability
-
Why Use GIS for This Model?
-
Perfectly suited for complex overlay analysis
-
Which Software Was Used?
-
On What Platform?
-
Digital Alpha unix workstation
Methodology
Criteria Values * Multiplier = Score
-
Create digital maps for each criterion
-
Assign the Expert Choice Value
-
Overlay/Combine each datalayer
-
Dissolve microscopic polygons
-
Calculate Score for each polygon
-
Determine Number and Ranges of Classes and Aggregate Polygons
-
find statistical breaks in score array
Expert Choice Pairwise Criteria Rating Scale
| 1 |
|
TWO ELEMENTS CONTRIBUTE EQUALLY TO THE PROPERTY |
| 3 |
|
EXPERIENCE AND JUDGMENT SLIGHTLY FAVOR ONE OVER THE OTHER |
| 5 |
|
EXPERIENCE AND JUDGMENT STRONGLY FAVOR ONE OVER THE OTHER |
| 7 |
|
ONE ELEMENT IS STRONGLY FAVORED AND ITS DOMINANCE IS
DEMONSTRATED IN PRACTICE |
| 9 |
|
EVIDENCE FAVORING ONE ELEMENT OVER THE OTHER IS OF THE
HIGHEST POSSIBLE ORDER OF AFFIRMATION |
C (MEDIUM AND HIGH YIELD AQUIFERS )EQUAL TO
G (SEWERED COMM/IND ZONING)
H (0-200’ WsPA TRIBUTARY BUFFER) MODERATELY
MORE IMPORTANT
THAN I (200-400’ WsPA TRIBUTARY BUFFER)
RESULTS OF THE EXPERT CHOICE COMPARISON ANALYSIS
|
Criterion |
Weight |
| A |
> 8% Slope |
.018 |
| B |
Low yield aquifer |
.013 |
| C |
Medium/high yield aquifer |
.061 |
| D |
HD Res. zone, unsewered |
.072 |
| E |
HD Res. zone, sewered |
.027 |
| F |
Comm/Ind zone, unsewered |
.107 |
| G |
Comm/Ind zone, sewered |
.039 |
| H |
0-200 WPA buffer |
.136 |
| I |
200-400 WPA buffer |
.088 |
| J |
0-200 non-WPA buffer |
.278 |
| K |
200-400 non-WPA buffer |
.150 |
| L |
Other watershed lands |
.011 |
|
Overlay Basin |
Weight |
| 1 |
Worcester Water Supply Basin |
.056 |
| 2 |
Central Wachusett Basin |
.243 |
| 3 |
Route 12 Bridge Basin |
.701 |
Highest Scoring Land Purchasable with Remaining Land Acquisition Funds
Summary and Evaluation
-
All models are flawed
-
limited number of criteria
-
human factors are ignored
-
“Expert” decisions may be wrong
-
can’t predict the future or chaos
-
However, an invaluable tool
-
process stimulated discussion
-
thoughtful, reasoned approach
-
provides rationale for prioritizing
-
focused efforts
-
confirmed past purchases
-
useful analysis and statistics
GIS Geographic Information System - Model Process and Output
-
Hardware and Software
-
Methodology
-
Applications
-
Output
-
Summary and Evaluation
How Model is Used in Land Acquisition Program
| Land
Acquisition Parcel Selection |
| | |
| GIS
Model and Field Walk-over Filters Out Low Priority Parcels |
| | |
| Land
Acquisition Policy Panel |
| | |
| Land
Site Plan or Engineering work |
| | |
| Land
Survey Critical Area (if necessary) |
Pros and Cons of Model
-
Pros
-
Incorporates staff “expert opinion” into simple priorities
-
keeps focus on most sensitive land
-
Avoids significant spending on low priority parcels
-
spurs discussion and additional analysis
-
shows interested land owners why we can’t always buy their parcel
-
Cons
-
can oversimplify decisions if not used in conjunction with field
walk-overs and additional analysis
Contact Information:
Metropolitan District Commission
Division of Watershed Management
20 Somerset Street, 8th Floor
Phone: (617) 727-5274 x288
E-Mail: Paul.Penner@state.ma.us
Presentation by Frank Biasi, GIS Manager,
The Nature Conservancy
Abstract: Frank describes how The Nature Conservancy has been using
GIS to develop a portfolio of conservation sites for every major ecoregion
in the U.S., with the intent of protecting multiple viable examples of
rare species and their natural communities.
The Nature Conservancy - A Brief Description
-
"Nature's real estate agent."
-
Preserving habitats and species by buying the lands and waters they need
to survive.
-
The Nature Conservancy operates the largest private system of nature sanctuaries
in the world--more than 1,500 preserves in the
United States alone.
The Nature Conservancy: A Scorecard (as of December 1995)
-
Acres Protected in the U.S. since 1953: 9.5 million
-
Acres Protected outside the U.S. with TNC Assistance: 42 million
-
Acres Managed: 1.3 million (acres TNC owns or has under conservation
easement)
-
Membership: 828,000
-
Corporate Associates: 1,385
-
Preserves Under Conservancy Management: 1,500
-
Natural Heritage Inventory Programs and Conservation Data Centers:
86
KEY TERMS
Element - plant or animal species, or natural community type
Community - unique assemblage of plant species occurring
occurring under certain environmental conditions (e.g. salt marsh, alpine
summit)
Element occurrence - incidence of an element on the ground
Ecoregion - area of similar climate and vegetation (used
as planning unit)
Ecoblock - area of contiguous natural land bounded by
roads and shorelines
TNC Ecoregional Planning Units
ECOREGION-BASED CONSERVATION
-
Proactive, strategic, science-based planning
-
Eliminate redundancy in element representation on TNC lands
-
Fill gaps in element representation on all protected lands
-
Allow states to compare their occurrences to those in other states
-
Maximize efficiency of conservation efforts
OVERALL GOAL
-
For every ecoregion, assemble a portfolio of conservation sites that captures
the ecoregion’s full biological diversity.
-
The portfolio will contain multiple viable occurrences of every native
species and community type, in sufficient number, distribution and quality,
to insure the element’s existence and genetic variation within the ecoregion.
PORTFOLIO ASSEMBLY PROCESS
-
Identify & classify target elements
-
Set conservation goals & criteria for each element
-
Identify & map potential matrix blocks
-
Assess & classify potential matrix blocks
-
Run site selection model for matrix sites
-
Assess contribution of matrix sites to other goals
-
Repeat steps 3-6 for patch communities & species
-
Survey additional blocks to complete portfolio
1. Identify & classify target elements
CONSERVATION TARGETS
-
All viable occurrences of very rare species or communities
-
Highly viable occurrences of semi-rare species or communities
-
Large, viable landscape complexes of common communities
COMMUNITY CLASSIFICATION
Taxonomic Class
-
overstory & understory plant species composition
-
heirarchical classes from gross structure to species
-
official national classification system (FWS, GS-BRD)
Patch Size
-
matrix - spruce-fir forest, northern hardwoods,...
-
large patch - red maple swamp, pitch pine-oak barren,...
-
small patch - calcareous fen, acidic bog,...
Distribution
-
restricted - confined to ecoregion
-
limited - occurs in a few neighboring ecoregions
-
widespread - occurs across many ecoregions
-
occasional - core of distribution is in another ecoregion
2. Set conservation goals & criteria
for each element
CONSERVATION GOALS & CRITERIA
-
How many occurrences are needed to preserve the element?
-
What spatial distribution is necessary to represent its variation?
-
What constitutes a “viable” occurrence of the element?
-
What are the main ecological processes that affect the element?
-
What are the main threats to the element’s viability?
3. Identify & map potential matrix
blocks
BASE DATALAYERS
|
|
Element occurrences (EO) - rare species & community
point locations
Ecoregions (ECO) - TNC ecoregional planning units with
USFS subsections
Roads (RDS) - roads, trails, & utility corridors,
with line & polygon topology
Hydrography (HYD) - lakes, ponds, rivers, streams, coastlines,
& wetlands
Shorelines (HYDPOL) - lake, river, & ocean polygons
selected from HYD
Ecoblocks (BLK) - combined lines & polygons from
RDS & HYDPOL |
4. Assess & classify potential matrix
blocks
ECOBLOCK ATTRIBUTES
-
Size - total area, core & edge area, area/perimeter ratio, roundness,
max. neighbor size, boundary classes
-
Condition - acres & % of old growth, # & % of disturbed
patches, miles of interior roads & trails, past land use
-
Diversity - summary statistics on species, communities, cover types,
topography, hydrology, geology, soils, etc.
-
Landscape context - mgmt. status, mgmt. potential, current land
uses, demographics, positive & negative proximities
ANCILLARY DATALAYERS
|
|
Managed areas (MA) - coverage of protected parcels
Land cover (LC) - grid of classified TM satellite imagery (30m)
Elevation (DEM) - grid surface of elevations (90m)
Land use (LU) - coverage of current land use
Watersheds (BAS) - coverage of drainage basins
Soils (SOIL) - coverage of major soil classes
Surficial geology (GEO) - coverage of geology classes
Census blocks (CENS) - coverage with demographic attributes
Plot data (PLOT) - FIA, NRI, & other field sampled points |
5. Run site selection model for matrix
sites
View Table with site selection model categories.
6. Assess contribution of matrix sites
to other goals
7. Repeat steps 3-6 for patch communities
& species
8. Survey additional blocks to complete
portfolio
ADVANTAGES OF ECOBLOCKS
-
ecologically meaningful units for research, planning, &management
-
recognizable to conservation staff, decisionmakers, and the public
-
discrete, objectively defined features
-
easily developed dataset based on public sources
-
easy to field locate and survey
-
easy to coregister with remotely sensed data
-
easy to eliminate highly developed areas from analysis
-
good method of generalizing EO locations for public display
-
correlated with parcel and census boundaries and site boundaries
-
updated regularly by outside agencies
-
heirarchical and scaleable (by road class)
-
complete landscape tesselation
-
rich area and boundary attributes (size, shape, width, traffic volumes)
-
can derive interior forest polygons, distance-to-road surfaces,
etc
LIMITATIONS OF ECOBLOCKS
-
don’t work as well for aquatic elements
-
require periodic revisions
-
huge variation in polygon size
-
complex topology
Contact Information:
The Nature Conservancy
201 Devonshire Street, 5th Floor
Boston, MA 02110
Phone: (617) 542-1908 x240
Fax: (617) 482-5866
E-Mail: fbiasi@tnc.org
Presentation by Christian Jacqz, GIS Manager,
MassGIS, Executive Office of Environmental Affairs
"GIS Data and Tools for Watershed Management"
Christian describes a variety of GIS-based tools that are under development
to support the management and display of watershed-based information and
to support the interface between GIS and hydrological modeling.
MassGIS....
-
GIS resource for state environmental agencies located in Exec. Office of
Environmental Affairs
-
maintains & develops statewide GIS library
-
promotes standards for data and metadata
-
regional scale data development
-
software tools based on ESRI products
-
variety of sources for existing data:
-
USGS
-
Federal Agencies
-
EOEA agencies
-
UMASS
-
web site www.state.ma.us/mgis
Specific Initiatives related to water resources
-
Orthophoto mapping and Digital Terrain Model
-
Open Space
-
Hydro network
-
Wetlands
-
Land use update
-
Dams
-
Public water supplies & WHPA’s
|
|
|
-
Zoning
-
Soils and Surficial Geology
-
Environmental Permits
-
Water quality monitoring
-
21e
-
Land cover
-
Floodplains
|
Tools - using centerline on PC platform
Objectives:
-
create framework for management of GIS data related to surface water
such as sampling locations, gauging stations, permitted discharges etc.
-
create PC based tools to support query and display of these data using
dynamic segmentation model - this obviates need for end-user manipulation
of GIS coverages or shape files
-
extend MassGIS Data Viewer to allow for management of point and linear
event models in user-friendly environment with built-in meta-data
Process:
-
create single line network with hierarchical coding scheme
-
implement global query algorithms
-
extend theme inventory concept
Tools - using DTM on PC platform
Objectives:
-
adopt PC based tools to support interactive delineation of basins, analysis
of basin characteristics and interfaces to models
-
optimize raster elevation data format for accuracy and processing speed
-
integrate vector and raster modes of analysis
Process:
-
develop digital terrain model (expensive)
-
get Spatial Analyst with hydrological extensions
-
“burn in” vector network so that products are consistent
-
adopt coding scheme relating sub-basins to network
Using hydro centerline network - arcs & nodes
-
The centerline is an abstraction - a river system represented as a network
of directed arcs
-
In order to support query of this network we designed a coding scheme for
a route system roughly analogous to traditional river-mile systems
Step 1:
-
Number nodes in order of increasing distance from outlet of basin to headwaters
-
The GIS “route” is sort of equivalent to a named feature, but named features
start and stop along a centerline network (eg at pond inlets and outlets)
and thus don’t exactly correspond to routes in this system
-
Strictly speaking, a route could include any collection of arcs but we
insist that they be connected
-
English: Starting at the mouth of the basin number features sequentially
including all reaches from confluence to furthest upstream point
-
GIS: Starting with first to-node assign unassigned arcs on path
from current to-node to furthest from-node into new unique routes
Step 2:
-
Measures are computed for all confluences in terms of river miles
along the downstream route
Hydro network query tools
With this set of tools - what can you do?
-
Create point and line events interactively
-
Query point and linear event tables upstream, downstream
-
View image link
-
Highlight network upstream, downstream
-
View text link
Hydro network utility menu
Other tools provide batch processing and data management?
-
Attribute table for event theme
-
Query of linked data tables
-
Batch processing of coverage input
-
Display of interpolated values or setup of model interface
From within the MassGIS Data Viewer, users of this tool can query
both upstream and downstream events
Querying network in ArcView
-
“Trace” functions operate on route attributes to create linear event tables
corresponding to query results
-
Upstream trace function works with loops in the route coverage
Displaying linear attributes
-
One script allows for display of monitoring results by coding reaches between
stations
-
Linear event table is created from set of point events (water quality samples)
to highlight non-attainment of designated uses - a simplistic but
effective display technique
Tool contains the "Raindrop Tool" - what is the flow path of any raindrop?
-
The user selects a point and its flow path is highlighted.
-
Similar abilities for the contributing area of of an area or line
Use newly delineated basin and existing GIS information to produce descriptive
statistics which are then input to watershed models
Contact Information:
MassGIS
Executive Office of Environmental Affairs
20 Somerset Street, 3rd Floor
Boston, MA 02108
Phone: (617) 727-5227 x322
Fax: (617) 227-7045
E-Mail: Christian.Jacqz@state.ma.us
MGIC Home
Page | Index of Past Meetings
Last Updated 4/19/2000
EOEA Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
|
|