The Official Website of the Office of Geographic and Environmental Information (MassGIS)

 
  Massachusetts Geographic Information Council (MGIC)
 
December 2, 1997 - Boston, MA

"NEW TOOLS FOR GIS"
Open GIS and Spatial Multimedia

The following sections provide brief summaries, in outline form, of the main points presented by the listed speakers at the December 2, 1997 meeting of the Massachusetts Geographic Information Council (MGIC). 

Moderator - Peter Van Demark, Manager of Customer Services for Caliper Corporation



Presentation by Lance McKee, Vice President, Corporate Communications for Open GIS Consortium, Inc.

Abstract: The Open GIS specification is designed to enable interoperability among heterogeneous GIS systems. The goal is the full integration of geospatial data and geoprocessing resources into mainstream computing. 

Open GIS website -- http://www.opengis.org/

  • Consensus-based consortium of public and private sector organizations
  • Founded to create an industry-wide open-operability standard
  • Envisions full integration of geographical data
  • Includes software and hardware companies, universities, data developers, government agencies
  • Sharing geodata within and between information communities -- network computing resources with Open GIS interfaces.
  • Old Paradigm --> Static Data Transfer

  • vs.
    Open GIS --> Dynamic Interoperability, working over the network as well as on the desktop
  • Now, a "migration from traditional GIS" -- still somewhat proprietary, but strides toward common components, which means more freedom for users (i.e. ESRI's Spatial Database Engine can manage GIS data in Oracle as well as in INFO)
  • Merge many data types (i.e. remote sensing imaging and survey maps can move fluidly to users
  • Structure of how Open GIS technology is implemented:
    • Telecommunications - provide base of the data transfer
    • Client-Server Technology
      • Network-accessible universal servers
      • Distributed computer platforms (DCPs)
      • CORBA, Java
    • Open GIS Specification
      • Data suppliers
      • Vendors
      • Integrators
      • Users
      • Researchers
      • All of the above benefit --> a consesus process
    • GeoPressing Market Channels
      • Application developers (i.e. GIS in a marketing presentation)
      • Consumer model (i.e. GPS in automoblies for navigation)
      • Enterprise model (integrated approach to using GIS data)
      • Agency programs (i.e. Department of Defense imagery programs, allowing, for example, for a "virtual view" in binoculars of what is beyond a hill)
  • Open GIS is an interface standard
    • Features and coverages can be implemented by relational or object-based GIS software
    • Common set of requests can be understood by Open GIS - compliant services (create, delete, query, etc.)
  • There must be communication between the database server and the client to interpret well-known structures (i.e. coordinates, lines, strings, rings, polygons, and others) from one type of software to another

Contact Information:
35 Main Street, Suite 5
Wayland MA 01778
USA 

Phone: (508) 655-5858
Fax: (508) 655-2237
E-mail: lmckee@opengis.org


Presentation by Michael J. Shiffer, Ph.D., Director of the Computer Resource Laboratories of MIT's Department of Urban Studies and Planning

"Spatial Multimedia: GIS and Multimedia Finally Converge"

Abstract: The evolutionary paths of GIS and multimedia have been converging over recent years. The result has been the development of spatial multimedia tools, such as maps linked to digital video, dynamic imagery and sound linked to quantitative measures, and personal recollections, anecdotes, and opinions. The resulting product is a computer-based map that is projected on the wall of a meeting room. Pointing to locations on a map might yield images of predicted automobile traffic levels, television interviews with concerned residents, or sounds of aircraft taking off from a proposed runway (played at realistic decibel levels!) This talk will describe the promise and potential pitfalls of spatial multimedia, by highlighting the lessons learned in several case studies that have involved MIT's Department of Urban Studies and Planning. It is hoped that an extended application of this research will result in a better understanding of the technology's role in shaping planning processes and its effects on planning-related discussions. 

MIT Computer Resource Lab website: http://gis.mit.edu/

Overview:

  • Traditionally:
    • Spatial analysis (GIS)
      • Overlays
      • Buffers, etc.
    • Spatial Representation (multimedia)
      • Virtual navigation
      • Image Mapping
  • Now these world collide
    • Images are part of GIS queries
    • Customizable GIS tools for the creation of electronic kiosks
  • Recently:
    • access GIS from WWW browsers
    • access WWW browsers from GIS software
    • Massive growth of GIS "users" - whether they know it or not

Traditional Means of Communication
  Same Time Different Time
Same 
Place
Community 
Meeting
Individual 
Plan Review
Different 
Place
Human 
Proxies
Letter and 
Newspaper-based 
Discourse

These traditional means of communication can be enhanced with multimedia and GIS:

  • Interactive maps
  • Orthophoto browser (i.e. the MIT Orthophoto browser)
  • It is now possible to have "GIS conversations" over the network by collaberating with ArcView GIS software, between different users on different machines, and each sees the other's actions in his or her own View window.
  • The use of videoconferencing tools, i.e. cable TV access channels
  • Quick-Time movies
  • Virtual Reality
  • The use of "noise contours" in planning applications for looking at the effect of decibel levels on residents near a proposed aircraft repair facility to be located on a closed air base undergoing a reuse plan. Planners can incorporate different types of planes at different distances from the runways.
  • Put video clip hot links into an ArcView map for showing level of service for traffic volume on a roadway, allowing users to get a look at what roads really look like at rush hour when clicking on a particular line symbol.

Questions and Issues:

Many questions remain and more research is needed in innovation, institutionalization, and use
==> What form will spatial multimedia tools take in the future? 

Innovation

  • component GIS
  • spatial analysis components of the WWW
  • client vs. server
  • other?
  • How will data collection change?

  • -- Nodal Environmental Representative Devices (NERD - need better acronym!!)
  • How can we accomadate new media?
  • Who will pay for new media? (Consortia?)
Institutionalization
  • How can we match the technology to fit the resources of particular situations?
  • Who will maintain the systems?
  • What is the best way to deliver the technology to those who will benefit from its use?
  • What economic and bureaucratic limitations will there be?
Use
  • How can we evaluate the effects of these technologies?
  • How does the use of these technologies change the nature of community-related conversations?


Contact Information:

Michael J. Shiffer, Ph.D.
Department of Urban Studies & Planning
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
77 Massachusetts Ave. Room 9-514
Cambridge, MA 02139
USA 

Phone: (617) 253-0782
Fax: (617) 253-3625
Email: mshiffer@mit.edu
Website: http://gis.mit.edu/people/mshiffer/


MGIC Home Page | Index of Past Meetings


 Home | About MassGIS | What's New | MassGIS Data | Download Free Data | Order Maps & Data | Online Mapping 
Data Viewer | Municipal GIS | GIS Education | Standards | Other GIS Resources | Site Contents | Search 

Last Updated 4/19/2000
EOEA Disclaimer | Privacy Policy