| |
Assessors' Parcels - June 2009
OVERVIEW
MassGIS'
Asessors' Parcels comprise a collection of digital data provided to
MassGIS by individual cities and towns or regional planning agencies.
The data are stored in two layers -- "Level II" parcels, which comply
with the MassGIS Standard for Digital Parcels, and "Level 0" parcels,
which do not meet the standard but were available in digital format.
See Status Map (PDF) for available towns.
Level II Data
The
Level II digital parcel data were provided to MassGIS by
communities, or their regional planning agency partners, that received
parcel grants from MassGIS in 2002 and 2006. Each municipality's
parcels found in this data set were provided to MassGIS separately and
then appended together to form this single data layer. Most of the
parcel data included in this data layer has not been updated since it
was received by MassGIS in 2002/2003 and 2006.
This data layer is under development. At the present time Level II data are available for 48 municipalities.
In June 2009 parcels for Auburn were replaced with a new submission from the town representing its FY 2010 data.
The grant recipients were required to deliver digital parcel data complying with "Level II" of the MassGIS Standard for Digital Parcels and Related Data Sets.
The data submitted by grant recipients were subjected to a rigorous
quality assurance process to ensure compliance with the standard. The
standard establishes requirements for how parcel boundaries are
compiled. It also requires establishing a few attributes of the
polygons that are unique to the standard. In addition, the standard
requires that a minimum selection of information from the assessor's
database be included in a separate database table that can be linked to
the parcel polygons. At Level II of the standard, an "intersection
table" is required, which makes it possible to correctly model the
one-to-many and many-to-many relationships that exist between assessor
map polygons and assessor databases.
In ArcSDE, MassGIS stores the polygons as ASSESSPAR_POLY. The intersection table is named ASSESSPAR_POLY_INT and the database table is named ASSESSPAR_POLY_DATA. Two relationship classes have been built to link the polygons to the database table, by way of the intersection table: ASSESSPAR_POLY_REL1_POLY2INT relates the polygon layer to the INT table on LOC_ID, and ASSESSPAR_POLY_REL2_INT2DATA relates the INT table to the DATA table on PROP_ID. Data distributed to the publc is stored in a spatial view named ASSESSPAR_POLY_PUBLIC.
Compliance with Level II of the Standard
Users of parcel
data that MassGIS has approved as meeting the requirements for Level II
of its standard may find places where the boundaries conflict with
visible features on orthophotos. MassGIS' QA process is not
perfect. It is possible that we might miss some boundary
compilation errors. However, it also very likely that a
discrepancy is real. The largest source of discrepancies are
disagreements between how road rights-of-way are built as compared to
how they are depicted on assessor maps; this applies both to
right-of-way widths and to road confgiuration. In this context,
one community in particular requires special mention.
In reviewing the Town of Auburn's parcel data for compliance with Level
II, MassGIS found a few areas of the town where the discrepancies
between the assessor boundaries and the orthophoto were widespread and
very noticeable. After consulting with the town's contractor and
the assessor, and after reviewing scans of selected assessor maps and a
few plans from the Worcester Registry of Deeds, we found that the
construction of roads and houses in these portions of the town did not
agree with the original approved plans. Also, sometimes the
quality of the approved plans was sub-standard. In other words,
in parts of Auburn, the digital parcel mapping is a correct rendition
of the assessor's maps but the assessor's maps were sometimes updated
from sub-standard plans and/or development did not match the approved
plans. The town is in the process of identifying areas that
will need to be redrawn where there are surveys available that indicate
errors in the existing mapping.
Level 0 Data
In addition to acquiring Level II data, MassGIS has been collecting
"non-Level II-compliant" digital parcel data from other communties. The
quality of these "Level 0" data is very uneven and, for any given
community, the data may not represent a current version of the
assessor's parcel mapping.
In ArcSDE, MassGIS stores the polygons as ASSESSPARNC_POLY. Data distributed to the publc is stored in a spatial view named ASSESSPARNC_POLY_PUBLIC.
Level 0 data are available for 150 municipalities.
In June 2009 data were added for Amesbury, Millbury, Southborough and
Watertown; data were replaced for Ashland, Bourne, Dennis, Orleans,
Provincetown, Truro, Wellfleet and Yarmouth.
|
PRODUCTION
For Level II data, upon
receiving grants, communities, regional planning agencies or their
consultants worked to develop the polygon and attribute data using a
variety of methods. Once sent to MassGIS in shapefile format, the data
underwent thorough quality control in ArcView 3.3. Some further editing
was done using ArcView 3.3 and ArcGIS 8.x and 9.x. The shapefiles were
then loaded into a single ArcSDE 9.x layer. The dBase intersection and
database tables provided to MassGIS underwent some minor editing and
reformatting before being combined into single SDE tables. For more information on the requirements see the Standard.
Level 0 data went through minimal QA at MassGIS. Attributes were
matched to the fields present in the MassGIS Level 0 layer, where
present. Towns are added to the statewide layer as they become
available.
ATTRIBUTES
Descriptions of the attributes
for the Level II polygon layer and the intersection and database tables, as well
as how to link the tables for attribute query, are found in the Standard.
The Level 0 polygon layer has the following attributes:
| Item |
| Description |
| MAP_ID |
| Assessors' map block and lot |
| SITE_ADDR |
| Site address |
| OWNER |
| Site owner (not distributed) |
| TOWN_ID |
| Town identifier (1-351) |
| ACRES |
| Acreage of polygon |
| USECODE |
| Use category (not distributed) |
| CNTROID_ID |
| Unique ID created from parcel centroid coordinates in NAD83 Mass. State Plane Mainland meters |
| WG_MAPID |
| Warren Group ID (not distributed) |
| WG_YEAR |
| Year of Warren Group data used for WG_MAPID (not distributed) |
MAINTENANCE
Data in this layer are mostly
current as of 2003. Some communities have provided updates since then
or brought their data to Level II status since that time. The dates of Level 0 data vary. MassGIS
updates this layer as municipalities provide more up-to-date data or as
funding is available for creating additional Level II data. See the Parcel Mapping page for more details. The
best source for the most current data are the individual cities and
towns. Level II data have been developed for these municipalities:
AMHERST
AUBURN
BEDFORD
BELLINGHAM
BERKLEY
BOLTON
BROOKLINE
CHELMSFORD
COHASSET
DIGHTON
|
|
DRACUT
DUXBURY
EAST LONGMEADOW
EASTHAM
EASTHAMPTON
EASTON FAIRHAVEN
FALL RIVER
FALMOUTH
GROTON
|
|
HALIFAX
HANOVER HOLYOKE
HULL
LOWELL MANSFIELD
MARLBOROUGH
MASHPEE
MEDWAY
NEW BEDFORD
|
|
NEWTON NORTH ATTLEBOROUGH
NORTHBOROUGH
NORTON
PLYMOUTH
RAYNHAM
READING
REHOBOTH
SALEM
|
|
SEEKONK
SHREWSBURY
SOMERSET
SPENCER
SWANSEA
TAUNTON
WALTHAM
WEST SPRINGFIELD
WESTFORD
|
As MassGIS has yet to
institute a system for receiving updates on a regular basis, we suggest that users contact
the individual municipalities for the most current data. Due to local
privacy concerns and the changeability of property owners, the
FEE_OWNER field has been removed from the data as they appear in OLIVER.
Note to municipalities: In exchange for receiving a freshly updated
copy of a community's parcel data at least annually, MassGIS will
distribute your parcel data via our web site. Then, communities need
simply refer those requesting their parcel data to the MassGIS web site.
Last Updated 6/29/2009 EOEEA Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
|
|