| |
Prime Forest Land - June 2007
OVERVIEW
 |
The project “Soil
Productivity Mapping for Use in Forest Management” is a digital
representation of work done previously in the Department of Natural
Resources Conservation at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
GIS data created for this project followed (where possible) the
protocol established in UMass Research Bulletin #705 – Prime Forest
Land Classification for Forest Productivity in Massachusetts.
Using
primarily the NRCS/MassGIS Soils data, the basic procedure was to
classify potentially forested land into nine
different categories based on potential average timber productivity of
white pine and red oak “…per acre per year at culmination of mean
annual increment. Site index values are at age 50.” Other data sets
were used to refine this classification, including aspect, land cover,
riparian, slope position, wetlands, hydrologic soil association and
unique areas.
The layer is named PRIMEFOREST_POLY. |
METHODOLOGY
The categories of potentially forested land are:
|
|
|
| Cubic Volume |
| Site Index |
|
|
|
| ft3/ac |
| m3/ha |
| ft |
| m |
| WHITE PINE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
| Prime 1 |
| >155 |
| >10.9 |
| >70 |
| >21 |
| 2 |
| Prime 2 |
| 120-154 |
| 8.4–10.8 |
| 60–69 |
| >18-<21 |
| 3 |
| Prime 3 |
| 85-119 |
| 6.0-8.3 |
| 50-59 |
| >15-<18 |
| 3W |
| Prime 3 Wet |
| 85-119 |
| 6.0-8.3 |
| 50-59 |
| >15-<18 |
| S |
| Statewide Importance |
| 65-84 |
| 4.6-5.9 |
| 45-49 |
| >14-<15 |
| SW |
| Statewide Importance Wet |
| 65-84 |
| 4.6-5.9 |
| 45-49 |
| >14-<15 |
| L |
| Local Importance |
| <65 |
| <4.6 |
| <45 |
| <14 |
| LW |
| Local Importance Wet |
| <65 |
| <4.6 |
| <45 |
| <14 |
| UW |
| Unique Wet |
| N/A |
| N/A |
| N/A |
| N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| NORTHERN RED OAK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
| Prime 1 |
| >55 |
| >3.9 |
| >65 |
| >20 |
| 2 |
| Prime 2 |
| 45-54 |
| 3.2–3.8 |
| 60–64 |
| >18-<20 |
| 3 |
| Prime 3 |
| 40-44 |
| 2.8-3.1 |
| 55-59 |
| >17-<18 |
| 3W |
| Prime 3 Wet |
| 40-44 |
| 2.8-3.1 |
| 55-59 |
| >17-<18 |
| S |
| Statewide Importance |
| 35-39 |
| 2.5-2.7 |
| 50-54 |
| >15-<17 |
| SW |
| Statewide Importance Wet |
| 35-39 |
| 2.5-2.7 |
| 50-54 |
| >15-<17 |
| L |
| Local Importance |
| <35 |
| <2.7 |
| <50 |
| <15 |
| LW |
| Local Importance Wet |
| <35 |
| <2.7 |
| <50 |
| <15 |
| UW |
| Unique Wet |
| N/A |
| N/A |
| N/A |
| N/A |
In order to assign one of these values (1, 2, 3, 3W,
S, SW, L, LW and UW), the process required the use of the following
digital data:
- Soils data produced by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (downloaded from MassGIS)
- Topographic data (slope, aspect and slope
position derived from DTM point elevation data downloaded from MassGIS)
to create a hydrologically accurate surface grid
- Wetlands data was used to assign a “W”
modifier to the classification (from the MA Department of Environmental
Protection [DEP] Wetlands Conservancy Program and National Wetland
Inventory [NWI] data where DEP data is not available, both downloaded
from MassGIS)
- Land use – land cover data produced by
Resource Mapping at UMass to determine forested, potentially forested
and non-forested areas as of 1999.
- Riparian corridor data (downloaded from MassGIS) (note: no longer distributed by MassGIS)
- Unique vegetated communities (in this case Atlantic White Cedar wetlands, downloaded from MassGIS)
There was a minimum mapping unit of 5 acres for the project initially
but when the project was recreated digitally, there was a minimum
mapping unit of 0.5 acres. Potentially forested land included all
land currently forested as well as abandoned farmland and unimproved
pastures. A master list of soil associations was developed based
on the timber productivity values listed above.
There are 135 different soil associations in Massachusetts, 83 (61.5%)
are hard wired into a defined category while 52 (38.5%) can go one
category higher or lower. For these soil associations that are
between prime forest categories AND on forested or open land, we would
use slope, slope position, aspect, and riparian corridors to bump the
classification up or down one category using NRCS “Hydrologic Groups”
and this ancillary data. The rules developed for this process
state:
aspect: if droughty soil on south
facing slope, move down one category, all others move up, if wet soil
on south facing slope, move up one category, all others move down
slope position: if droughty soil on bottom of slope, move up one category,
all else down one category, if wet soil on bottom of slope, move down one category, all else up one category
As of 2006, digital soils data existed for all of Barnstable,
Berkshire, Bristol, Dukes, Essex, Middlesex, Nantucket, Norfolk, and
Suffolk counties as well as parts of Hampden, Hampshire and Worcester
Counties. This covered about 68% of the state. In 2007, 3
areas were added (Central Hampshire, Central Hampden and NW Worcester
Counties) so that 83% of the state was completed. Once additional
soils data becomes available, the process can easily be run on these
new areas to produce prime forest data for these missing areas.
ATTRIBUTES
The most important field
in the database for this data is in the “PRIME” column. This
classifies each polygon into one of the following categories (see
timber productivity values above):
| 1 |
| Prime 1 |
| (These first
four are
considered
“PRIME”) |
| 2 |
| Prime 2 |
|
| 3 |
| Prime 3 |
|
| 3W |
| Prime 3 Wetland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| S |
| Statewide Importance |
|
|
| SW |
| Statewide Importance Wetland |
|
|
| L |
| Local Importance |
|
|
| LW |
| Local Importance Wetland |
|
|
| UW |
| Unique Wetland (Atlantic White Cedar) |
|
|
The other item in the layer's polygon attribute table is ACRES, which stores the acreage of each polygon.
MAINTENANCE
DCR will maintain the layer and provide new data for other survey areas to MassGIS when available. Questions can be directed to:
David Goodwin, Management Forestry Program
DCR, Central Region
40 Cold Storage Drive
Amherst, MA 01004
413 545-5748
David.Goodwin@state.ma.us
Last Updated 6/25/2007 EOEA Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
|
|