| |
DEP 2002 Integrated List of Waters (305(b)/303(d)) - January 2005
Download
this layer (ESRI Shapefile format); also includes:
- WBS2002_INTLST02.dbf
- ArcGIS 8.3 LYR files
- ArcView 3.x AVLs
|
OVERVIEW
Under Massachusetts
General Law (MGL) chapter 21 DEP is responsible for monitoring the
waters of the Commonwealth, identifying those waters that are impaired,
and developing a plan to bring them back into compliance with the
Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards. The list of impaired
waters, better known as the "303d list," identifies river, lake, and
coastal waters and the reasons for impairment.
Once a water body is identified as impaired, DEP is required by the
Federal Clean Water Act to essentially develop a "pollution budget"
designed to restore the health of the impaired water body. The process
of developing this “pollution budget”, generally referred to as a Total
Maximum Daily Load (TMDL), includes identifying the causes (types of
pollutant) and source(s) (where the pollutants come from) of the
pollutant from direct discharges (point sources) and indirect
discharges (non-point sources), determining the maximum amount of the
pollutant that can be discharged to a specific water body to meet water
quality standards, and developing a plan to meet that goal.
The
Massachusestts Department of Environmental Protection's Division of
Watershed Management (DWM), Watershed Planning Program (WPP) 2002
Integrated List data layer represents estuary, lake and river segments
assessed and summarized in the 2002 Report to Congress made under
sections 305(b) (“Water Quality Inventory”) and 303(d) of the Federal
Clean Water Act. This report, “Massachusetts Year 2002 Integrated
List of Waters”, can be obtained by contacting the MassDEP Division of
Watershed Management office in Worcester, Massachusetts. Information
pertaining to more recent versions of the Massachusetts Integrated List
can be found at http://mass.gov/dep/water/resources/tmdls.htm.
The Integrated List data layer, named after the Water Body System (WBS)
database upon which it was based, comprises two features classes, WBS2002_POLY for polygon features (lakes, ponds, and estuaries), and WBS2002_ARC for linear features (rivers, streams, and estuaries).
MANUSCRIPT
The
data layer was created using segment definitions from the 2002 version
of the WBS database. The specific segment descriptions were taken from
the segment definition table (SCRF1) from the Massachusetts version of
the WBS database (1,960 segments) for the 2002 reporting cycle.
Water Body Id codes (WBID’s) are assigned by DWM/WPP staff to each
segment and used in the WBS database. River segments, lakes/ponds, and
estuaries are included for the entire state of Massachusetts, covering
all major drainage basins.
PRODUCTION
Definitions of water
bodies segments were based on descriptions taken from the 2002 version
of the WBS database. The geo-referencing of
individual segments relied on the use of information that was derived
from: USGS 1:25,000 Topographic Maps, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration Nautical Charts at several scales, “Planimetry of
Harbors for the 1984 305(b) Report” memoranda, Massachusetts Stream
Classification Program, Part I: Inventory of Rivers and Streams,
Compilation of Lakes, Ponds, Reservoirs and Impoundments, Massachusetts
Surface Water Quality Standards (1996), and Water Quality Standards:
Volume 8, Coastal Waters (1967). Where definitions were still
ambiguous after using these references, DWM/WPP staff was consulted to
define and geo-reference individual water body segments.
River Segments:
Individual
River
segments are represented as one or many lines in the arc feature class.
River segments were geo-referenced in two general ways: 1) as a linear
dynamic segmentation event based on the centerline route network
developed by MassGIS, where available, 2) where centerline routes were
not available linework was derived from the MassGIS 1:25,000
hydrography based on USGS topographic maps. Additional on-screen
editing was performed as needed using USGS topographic map images and/or
MassGIS color orthophotos as a base map for all river segments.
Lake/Pond Segments:
Lake
and pond
segments are represented as one or many polygons in the polygon feature
class. Lake and pond segment polygons were selected from the
MassGIS 1:25,000 hydrography layer, where available, and placed in a
separate file where additional editing (typically closure lines) may
have been performed. In some cases segments were drawn and/or
edited to reflect current or assessed waters using MassGIS color
ortho imagery and/or USGS quad images as the base map.
Estuary Segments:
Estuary segments
are represented as single lines, polygons, or both lines and polygons
(Some estuary segments have multiple lines/polygons representing one
water body segment). Where available, arcs were derived from the
MassGIS 1:25,000 hydrography based on the name and descriptions of each
estuarine segment. Additional onscreen digitizing to close
polygons, complete arcs or draw lines and polygons to reflect waters
actually assessed but that may have not been represented in the
hydrography layer was completed using the USGS topographic map imagery as the
base map.
All Segments (Rivers, Lakes/Ponds, Estuaries):
River, lake/pond
and estuary features, regardless of their derivation, were combined
into a single statewide feature class for lines (WBS2002_ARC) and a single statewide
feature class for polygons (WBS2002_POLY). No two river segments overlap, nor do
any two lake features or any two estuary features. However, there are
instances where a river line segment does overlap with the polygon
representing a lake segment, typically an impoundment.
ATTRIBUTES
In addition
to standard items (length in meters, area in square meters), attributes were extracted from the
Water Body System database and some formatting for ease of map labeling
was done. This table of attributes also exists as a stand-alone
table (WBS2002_INTLST02) related to geographic features by the WBID_2002
item. As some individual water bodies are represented as more
than a single geographic feature, estuaries may be represented by a
combination of a line and a polygon; care should be taken when
calculating summary statistics to avoid double counting. It is highly
recommended that the stand-alone table, in which there is only one
record per water body segment, be used for summary queries.
Items for the polygons and arcs are as follows.
| WBID_2002 |
| Water Body Segment Identification Code (WBID) for 2002 cycle of
Integrated Assessment and Listing under sections 305(b) and 303(d) |
| WB_NAME |
| Water Body Name: (Water Body names are based on SARIS, PALIS, or
CAMIS. SARIS = Stream and River Identification System, PALIS = Pond
and Lake Identification System, CAMIS = Coastal and Marine
Identification System) |
| WB_NAMESRT |
| Water Body Name Sort: Same as WB_NAME except the words “Lake” and “The”
have been placed so as to not influence the way the name is sorted
(i.e., “Lake George” is transformed to “George, Lake” will be sorted by
the “G” in “George” before the “L” in “Lake”) |
| WB_CODE |
| Unique Water Body Code from SARIS, PALIS, or CAMIS coding systems |
| WB_TYPE |
| Water Body Segment Type:- Estuary- Lake (or Pond)- River |
| WB_SIZE |
| Size of Water Body segment (Values in this field are
currently based on measurements made with map wheels and other
techniques including, but not limited to, planimetry using USGS Quad
sheets at a scale of 1:25,000). WB_SIZE is the size reported to the
EPA for the entire water body segment, not the size of an individual
arcs or polygons. |
| WB_UNIT |
| Water Body size units: - Acres (Lakes & Ponds) - Miles (Linear River Miles) - Square Miles (Estuaries) |
| WB_DESC |
| Water Body Segment Description: Descriptive locator of Water Body segment |
| WS_CODE |
| Watershed code: 2-digit watershed code based on system that includes all Massachusetts watersheds
(Based on SARIS, PALIS, or CAMIS). The watershed code “70”
(WS_NAME=”Boston Harbor”) does not appear in the MassGIS list of
watersheds – it is used for Water Body Segments that are not associated
with the standard MassGIS list of watersheds but are located in Boston
Harbor System.
|
| WS_NAME |
| Watershed name: Based on system that includes all Massachusetts watersheds
(Based on SARIS, PALIS, or CAMIS). The watershed name “Boston
Harbor” does not appear in the MassGIS list of watersheds – it is used
for Water Body Segments that are not associated with the standard
MassGIS list of watersheds but are located in Boston Harbor System.
|
| WS_CYCLE |
| Watershed Cycle: Identifies the phase of the
Massachusetts 5 year watershed/basin assessment cycle (Blue, Green,
Purple, Pink or Yellow) |
| LABEL1 |
| The WB_NAME, WBID_2002 and description (WB_DESC) are combined, formatted for a multi-line label |
| LABEL2 |
| The WB_NAME, WBID_2002, category (ILCategory) and impairments are combined, formatted for a multi-line label |
| LABEL3 |
| Lists the WBID_2002, Category, and impairments, formatted for a multi-line label |
| LABEL4 |
| Lists all the impairments to that segment, formatted for a multi-line label |
| ASSREPREF |
| Assessment Report Reference: The DWM publishes
detailed assessments of water quality that are used to make the
Integrated Listing decisions included in this data layer. The specific
report indicated refers to the report that was available and was used
as part of individual listing decisions. These reports include
detailed assessments of water quality including specific uses assessed,
level of use attainment, causes and sources if impairments were found
to be present, and actual data and/or references to data used to make
assessments. These assessment reports can be found at
http://www.mass.gov/dep/brp/wm/wqassess.htm. |
| ASDATE |
| Assessment date (YYYY-MM): Date that detailed assessment
of water quality was made for publication in an assessment report.
This date should not be confused with the date that the Integrated List
category determination is made – which is made statewide every two
years. |
| ILCATEGORY |
|
| Category 1: |
|
Attaining all designated uses. |
| Category 2: |
|
Attaining some of
the designated uses and insufficient or no data and information is
available to determine if the remaining uses are attained. |
| Category 3: |
|
Insufficient or no data and information to determine if any designated uses are attained. |
| Category 4a: |
|
Impaired for one or more designated uses but does not require the development of a TMDL: TMDL has been completed. |
| Category 4b: |
|
Impaired for one
or more designated uses but does not require the development of a TMDL:
Other pollution control requirements are reasonably expected to result
in the attainment of designated uses. |
| Category 4c: |
|
Impaired for one
or more designated uses but does not require the development of a TMDL:
Impairment is not caused by a pollutant. |
| Category 5: |
|
Impaired for one or more designated uses, requires the development of a TMDL: Impairment is caused by a pollutant. |
“Designated uses” are defined in
the Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards (314 CMR 4.00) that
can be found at http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/laws/regulati.htm#wqual. Designated
uses include: Aesthetics, Agriculture, Fish Consumption, Fish - other
Aquatic Life and Wildlife, Industrial Cooling, Outstanding Resource
Waters, Primary Contact Recreation, Public Water Supply, Secondary
Contact Recreation, and Shellfish Harvesting.
“Impaired” means that a water body segment is not attaining one or more designated uses.
“TMDL” - A Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) is, in essence, a clean up
plan that is required under the Federal Clean Water Act to restore
water quality and enable waters to attain designated uses.
|
| CNT_IMP |
| Count Impairments: Total count of impairments present for an individual water body segment |
| CNT_POLL |
| Count Pollutants: Count of impairments present that have been determined to be “Pollutants” |
| CNT_NONPOL |
| Count Non-Pollutants: Count of impairments present that have been determined to be non-pollutants |
| CNT_POLLNT |
| Count Pollutants Needing TMDL: Count of impairments
present that have been determined to be “Pollutants” and are in need of
TMDL work |
| CNT_POLLWT |
| Count of Pollutants With TMDL: Count of impairments
present that have been determined to be “Pollutants” and have been
included in a TMDL |
| IMP_#### |
| The 25 fields with “IMP_” prefix, when populated, indicate that specific impairment is present as given in the table below:
| FIELDNAME |
|
IMPAIRMENT |
| IMP_0000 |
|
Cause Unknown |
| IMP_0100 |
|
Unknown toxicity |
| IMP_0200 |
|
Pesticides |
| IMP_0300 |
|
Priority organics |
| IMP_0400 |
|
Nonpriority organics |
| IMP_0500 |
|
Metals |
| IMP_0600 |
|
Unionized Ammonia |
| IMP_0700 |
|
Chlorine |
| IMP_0800 |
|
Other inorganics |
| IMP_0900 |
|
Nutrients |
| IMP_1000 |
|
pH |
| IMP_1100 |
|
Siltation |
| IMP_1200 |
|
Organic enrichment/Low DO |
| IMP_1300 |
|
Salinity/TDS/chlorides |
| IMP_1400 |
|
Thermal modifications |
| IMP_1500 |
|
Flow alteration |
| IMP_1600 |
|
Other habitat alterations |
| IMP_1700 |
|
Pathogens |
| IMP_1900 |
|
Oil and grease |
| IMP_2000 |
|
Taste, odor and color |
| IMP_2100 |
|
Suspended solids |
| IMP_2200 |
|
Noxious aquatic plants |
| IMP_2500 |
|
Turbidity |
| IMP_2600 |
|
Exotic species |
| IMP_2700 |
|
Objectionable deposits |
Impairments are indicated by populating the fields with the “IMP_” prefix with one of the following:
-Pollutant
-Non-Pollutant
-TMDL [EPA Approval Date – Document Control Number]
Control numbers and associated TMDL reports are listed below:
CN014.0 Bare Hill Pond, Harvard, MA. (MA81007) TMDL
CN070.1 Total Maximum Daily Loads of Phosphorus for Selected Northern Blackstone Lakes
CN110.0 Total Maximum Daily Loads of Phosphorus for Selected French Basin Lakes
CN112.0 Total Maximum Daily Loads of Phosphorus for Selected Connecticut Basin Lakes
CN114.0 Total Maximum Daily Loads of Phosphorus for Salisbury Pond
CN115.0 Total Maximum Daily Loads of Phosphorus for Lake Quinsigamond and Flint Pond
CN116.0 Total Maximum Daily Loads of Phosphorus for Indian Lake
CN117.0 Total Maximum Daily Load of Phosphorus for Leesville Pond
CN118.0 Total Maximum Daily Loads of Phosphorus for Selected Chicopee Basin Lakes
CN119.0 Total Maximum Daily Loads of Phosphorus for Lake Boon
CN120.0 Total Maximum Daily Loads of Bacteria for Little Harbor
CN121.0 Total Maximum Daily Loads of Bacteria for Neponset River Basin
CN122.0 Total Maximum Daily Loads of Bacteria for the Shawsheen River Basin
These documents can be found at:
http://mass.gov/dep/water/resources/tmdls.htm
|
| STATUS |
| Status of data (Draft, Provisional, or Final) and date
of table extraction from the Massachusetts Water Body System (WBS) 2002
Integrated List Database (305(b)/303(d)) |
MAINTENANCE
As new 305(b)/303(d)
assessments are completed and segments are added, corrected or
modified, the DWM/WPP will be updating the geo-references of
305(b)/303(d) segments according to the two year Federal reporting
cycle. When these assessments have completed their internal and
external reviews and are submitted to the EPA and the public in a final
Integrated List Publication, the geographic representations and related
tables will also be updated at MassGIS. The next planned update
of 305(b)/303(d) assessments and associated geo-references will be for
the 2004 cycle of 305(b)/303(d) reporting.
In January, 2005, these updates were made: WBS2002_ARC: Geometry Edits
to existing arc segments to correct lengths, STATUS attribute updated.
WBS2002_POLY: Attribute updates only (STATUS).
For questions regarding the programmatic content of this data contact
Tom Dallaire in the DEP Watershed Planning Program at (508) 767-2744. For
questions relating to GIS and these data, contact Brian Brodeur in the
DEP GIS Program at (617) 574-6802.
Last Updated 6/22/2007 EOEA Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
|
|