|
|
|
|
NO. BD-2007-030
S.J.C. Order of Disbarment entered by Justice Cordy on January 30, 2009.1 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION On November 3, 2008, the Board of Bar Overseers (board) filed an Information with this court regarding the character and conduct of Michael J. Conley, Esquire, recommending his disbarment. Having reviewed the Information and the record of disciplinary proceedings below, I am entering an order that Michael J. Conley be disbarred forthwith. Bar counsel filed a petition for discipline on May 6, 2008, which was amended later that month. As amended, it alleges six counts of misconduct by the respondent, Michael J. Conley. Briefly, those counts allege that:
Conley was given notice of the petition for discipline and was directed to respond to it by June 19, 2008. Conley did not respond and a default judgment entered, the facts being deemed admitted pursuant to SJC Rule 4:01, § 8 (3). The board then sent Conley a letter advising him of his right to move for relief from default for good cause, and advising him of his right to file a brief before the board on the disposition of his case. Again, Conley did not respond within the required time limits.
Conley subsequently filed a motion to remove the default judgment and for leave to file a responsive pleading. That motion was allowed by the vice chair of the board on September 8, 2008, and Conley was ordered to file an answer to the petition on or before the close of business on October 1, 2008. No answer was filed. On October 13, 2008, Conley filed a motion to dismiss (but no answer), which was denied on October 16, 2008. On October 20, 2008, the board voted to file the Information with the Supreme Judicial Court recommending that Conley be disbarred.
After the Information was filed in this court, a hearing was scheduled for December 11, 2008. Conley, now represented by Attorney Andrew W. Pasquina, filed a motion to continue the hearing to December 19, 2008, which was allowed.2 On December 18, Attorney Pasquina filed a motion to remand the complaint to the board for a hearing. The motion was not accompanied by an affidavit from Conley. A hearing on the Information and the motion was then scheduled for January 15, 2009, at 10 A.M. The respondent was given notice but failed to attend. His attorney was present, but was unable to explain respondent's absence.
I decline to grant the relief requested by the respondent. Conley has made no showing, through affidavit or otherwise, that any extenuating circumstances caused his failures to file timely responses (or any responses at all) during the course of the disciplinary proceedings, or that there is any sound basis to conclude that a defense exists to the underlying charges. The respondent has been afforded ample due process, of which he has not taken advantage. He has "a long history of failure to respond," and "has failed to show excusable neglect for those failures." In the Matter of Steven L. Winniman, No. BD-2007-023, slip op. at 3 (Mass., June. 23, 2008). The motion to remand the complaint for a hearing by the board is denied.
I further accept the recommendation of the board and ORDER that a judgment disbarring the respondent from the practice of law enter forthwith.
FOOTNOTES:
1 The complete Order of the Court is available by contacting the Clerk of the Supreme Judicial Court for Suffolk County.
2 The hearing scheduled for December 19, 2008, was cancelled.
BBO/OBC Privacy Policy. Please direct all questions to webmaster@massbbo.org.
© 2005. Board of Bar Overseers. Office of Bar Counsel. All rights reserved.