The State Organization Index provides an alphabetical listing of government organizations, including commissions, departments, and bureaus.
Top-requested sites to log in to services provided by the state
The Juvenile Court Department has jurisdiction in three major case types including delinquency/youthful offender proceedings, child in need of services proceedings (CHINS) and care and protection/termination of parental rights proceedings. The vast majority of cases addressed by the Juvenile Court fall within the parameters of these three case types. The Juvenile Court has jurisdiction, by statute, of matters ancillary to these three case types including guardianship petitions, paternity complaints, equity petitions and adoption petitions.
The work of the Juvenile Court often reflects shifting community expectations and social science theory regarding children. Those shifts in expectations often unpredictably alter Juvenile Court caseloads. In some instances, the Juvenile Court has become the first arbiter of issues more properly addressed by other institutions.
The purpose of the time standards is to provide guidelines for application in the great majority of cases; it being understood that, as a matter of discretion in specific situations, a judge may extend time periods and vary requirements in the interest of justice. The time standards set forth below for the trial, settlement or other disposition of cases are applicable to cases filed in any division of the Juvenile Court Department on or after January 1, 2007. The benchmarks are not part of the time standards but are provided to offer guidance in achieving compliance with the standards.
Indictment of a juvenile as a Youthful Offender proceeds only at the option of the District Attorney for whom there are no time requirements for the exercise of that option.
These time standards do not apply to juvenile jury trials heard in the district courts.
1. Arraignment (within fifteen (15) days from the issuance of the complaint)
2. Pre-trial Conference (within thirty (30) days from the arraignment)
The prosecuting attorney and defense counsel shall confer prior to the scheduled pretrial hearing in order to conference the case and to prepare a written pretrial conference report. In addition to those matters set forth in the Rules of Criminal Procedure, counsel shall also discuss whether the case can be disposed of by means of a plea and, if so, shall propose a date for a change of plea within the conference report. Special circumstances should be identified, including but not limited to: unavailability of victim or essential witness; information relating to the victim’s capacity to testify at trial within the time frame established by the standards; existence of multiple defendants; anticipated delays occasioned by necessary forensic or scientific testing (e.g. DNA testing, drug analysis, etc.); necessity for extended pretrial hearings such as Bishop/Fuller or similar proceedings but not including motions to dismiss or motions to suppress statements, evidence, search warrants, or identifications.
At preliminary hearing:
a. Petition to issue, or
b. Petition not to issue and referral for informal assistance for period not to exceed six (6) months*, or
c. Application dismissed
*Twelve (12) months where parents and child have agreed in writing to extension of informal assistance for period not to exceed six (6) months.
Though CHINS cases may be filed as stubborn, runaways, truants or habitual school offenders, in the case of runaways, the CHINS case starts with an application for a warrant for a runaway which may not be served for many months, thus departing from the time standards. Numerous other reasons may delay the final disposition of cases, such as the unavailability or inappropriateness of a home to which the child can return, and frequently, serious mental health issues which defy easy and quick resolution.
Care and Protection/Termination of Parental Rights cases are governed by statute, G.L. c. 119, §§24, 26 and G.L. c. 210, §3, which incorporated the mandates of the Federal Adoption and Safe Families Act into the General Laws in April 1999, as well as by Juvenile Court Rules.
The court’s finding that certain circumstances exist, which, by statute (G.L. c. 119, §29C), relieve the Department of Social Services of the requirement to make reasonable efforts to prevent removal or to reunify the family does not necessarily result in an uncontested trial.