The Commission dismissed the non-bypass equity appeal of the Appellant as his non-selection for Fire Lieutenant was not a bypass (tie) and an investigation by the Commission was not warranted.
The Commission dismissed the Appellant's non-bypass equity appeal as he was not bypassed for appointment and an investigation by the Commission regarding his non-selection is not warranted.
The Commission dismissed the Appellant's non-bypass equity appeal as it is undisputed that he had surpassed the maximum age restriction to serve as a firefighter in Worcester.
The Commission dismissed the Appellant's appeal after determining he is not an aggrieved person, but kept open an investigation regarding allegations related to prior promotional appointments.
The Commission dismissed the Appellant's appeal after he was unable to show that the City was violated any civil service law or rule through the use of 30-day emergency appointments followed by temporary appointments.
Dismissal of non-bypass equity appeal deferred to a future effective date to allow the City to investigate allegations raised by the Appellant that, if true, would constitute a violation of basic merit principles.
Non-bypass equity appeal denied. The Appellant was unable to show that at least 90 days of his service in the US Navy's National Accession Training Program was non-training active duty, as required by the statute to quality for veteran preference.
