Why was it necessary for MassDEP to set perchlorate standards?
MassDEP established perchlorate standards to ensure that public health is protected and to facilitate the cleanup of perchlorate sources.
What perchlorate standards did MassDEP set?
MassDEP promulgated a drinking water standard or Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 2 ppb. This is the first drinking water standard for perchlorate in the nation. Perchlorate soil and groundwater standards for hazardous waste site cleanup under the Massachusetts Contingency Plan or MCP (MGL Chapter 21E) were also established, along with the adoption of a reference dose (RfD) of 7 x 10-5 mg/kg-day to be used for site-specific risk assessments.
Will MassDEP update its perchlorate standards as new information becomes available in the future?
MassDEP is committed to reviewing the MCL every 6 years and will revise it as appropriate.
Why is MassDEP's drinking water standard lower than EPA's Drinking Water Equivalent Level of 24.5 ppb?
It is important to note that the US EPA has not yet set a standard for perchlorate and will likely not do so for several years. US EPA's 24.5 ppb Drinking Water Equivalent Level (DWEL) value is not a final standard but is an intermediate value used to set a final standard. It does not account for any other source of exposure. Final drinking water standards, including our own, consider other sources of exposure, including those from foods, which have been documented to occur. Because MassDEP considered other exposures, our MCL is lower than US EPA's DWEL value.
Why did MassDEP select a lower reference dose for perchlorate than US EPA?
The reference dose is the total daily dose of a chemical, from all sources, that is anticipated to be without risk of adverse effect. The US EPA adopted the reference dose value cited in the NAS perchlorate report that was supported by the majority of the NAS committee. It is important to note that the NAS committee was not unanimous in their views on this matter. One member concluded that perchlorate exposures should be lower than the majority recommended because of uncertainties in the science. This dissenting view would lead to a drinking water limit of about 2 ppb using MassDEP's established protocol. Although MassDEP scientists agreed with many of the findings in the NAS Perchlorate report, important new data became available after the NAS committee completed their assessment. This new data demonstrated that perchlorate is found in breast milk at significant levels, likely attributable to perchlorate in drinking water and foods, and supported MassDEP's conclusion that a lower exposure limit was needed in order to protect nursing newborn babies.
What is the basis of MassDEP's perchlorate standards?
MassDEP's perchlorate MCL is based on an assessment of the health risks of perchlorate using a thorough analysis of perchlorate's toxicity, including review of the NAS perchlorate report, by MassDEP toxicologists with extensive input from a science advisory committee comprised of academic scientists and public health professionals from other agencies. Other factors were then taken into account in selecting the final drinking water standard. These included the scope of the problem; the availability and feasibility of testing and treatment technologies; and data that demonstrated that perchlorate can be introduced into drinking water when certain disinfection chemicals are used. This latter issue was of particular concern. Disinfection of drinking water has been called one of the most important public health accomplishments of the past century. To ensure that this benefit is not compromised due to the possible introduction of perchlorate from the use of disinfection chemicals, MassDEP has chosen to set the MCL at a level that does not create any disincentive on the part of public water systems to continue or, when necessary, introduce disinfection to counter microbial contamination and associated risks to public health. The selected MCL of 2.0 ppb was determined to provide the best overall protection of public health, considering the benefits of disinfection, while retaining a margin of safety to account for uncertainties in the available data.
Is it feasible to meet the standard of 2 ppb?
Statewide occurrence monitoring conducted in 2004, using then newly improved analytical techniques, identified relatively few contaminated water supplies, suggesting a manageable aggregate cost for clean-ups. Treatment technologies have also been demonstrated to be capable of removing perchlorate in drinking water to low levels.