0067 1994 52
0067 1994 52 (Aug. 29, 2023) – Claimant’s failure to call new employees by their correct names was due to a good faith lapse in attention and her conduct was, therefore, not deliberate. For this reason, she may not be disqualified due to deliberate misconduct in wilful disregard of the employer’s interest, and she is eligible for benefits under G.L. c. 151A, § 25(e)(2).
0031 8875 66
0031 8875 66 (Feb. 5, 2020) – The claimant mistakenly believed that she had properly requested time off from work electronically, and her employer discharged her for failing to show up to work for the days she thought she had off. She is not disqualified under G.L. c. 151A, § 25(e)(2), because the claimant did not have a disqualifying state of mind when she was absent for the days in question.
0025 3567 20
0025 3567 20 (Jan. 14, 2019) – Although the claimant was told that she was scheduled to attend a training, and she did not attend the training or notify the employer that she was not going, she is not disqualified under G.L. c. 151A, § 25(e)(2), because the review examiner found that she simply forgot. Her misconduct was not deliberate.
BR-106310
BR-106310 (July 16, 2008) – Claimant’s failure to check a patient’s IV catheter was caused by negligence; it was not an intentional act. Therefore, regardless of the gravity of her error, she is entitled to benefits under G.L. c. 151A, § 25(e)(2).