• This page, VL 300.3 Reduced Hours , is   offered by
  • Board of Review

VL 300.3 Reduced Hours

Click on the case numbers below to access eligibility decisions concerning resignations due to the employer reducing the claimant’s regular hours of work.

0022 5079 11

0022 5079 11 (Apr. 24, 2018) – Claimant resigned because the involuntary transfer of his junior manager meant he could not take a planned vacation, he believed he would be forced to work even more hours than the usual 45 plus-hour week, and he thought the employer would reduce his pay at the end of the year when he could not meet new production goals. Losing a planned vacation is not good cause attributable to the employer under G.L. c. 151A, § 25(e)(1). Claimant did not stay in the job long enough to show that the staffing transfer actually had this detrimental effect on his hours, or that the employer would actually reduce his pay at the end of the year. [Note: the District Court affirmed the Board of Review’s Decision.]

0017 7900 96

0017 7900 96 (Oct. 19, 2016) — Claimant had good cause attributable to the employer to quit, because the on-call job given to him after returning from a workers’ compensation leave did not provide any hours for several weeks. The position was unsuitable.

BR-117158

BR-117158 (May 9, 2011) — An employer who unilaterally cut a claimant's hours indefinitely, then cut them further because the claimant objected, has created good cause for the claimant to resign his employment under G.L. c. 151A, § 25(e)(1).

BR-110763

BR-110763 (Mar. 28, 2010) — When the employer unilaterally cut the claimant’s hours in half, the job became unsuitable. Held claimant resigned for good cause attributable to the employer.

Help Us Improve Mass.gov  with your feedback

Please do not include personal or contact information.
Feedback