Press Release  AG Campbell Calls On USDA To Clarify SNAP Eligibility Guidance

Boston — Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell today joined 20 other attorneys general in sending a letter urging the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to correct errors in new federal instructions outlining who can receive Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. AG Campbell and the coalition warn that USDA’s new guidance wrongly treats several groups of immigrants as ineligible for food assistance, contradicts long-standing federal law, and could unlawfully block lawful permanent residents who were granted asylum or entered the United States as refugees, parolees, or other humanitarian entrants from receiving the food benefits to which they are entitled. 

“The Trump Administration continues to target our immigrant communities, this time, by going after families’ ability to put food on the table,” said AG Campbell. “Prohibiting people from receiving food assistance – beyond the eligibility limits established by Congress – is illegal and cruel. I am proud to stand with my colleagues in urging USDA to immediately correct their guidance so that all eligible SNAP recipients can access these essential benefits.”  

On October 31, USDA sent guidance to state SNAP agencies outlining changes to program eligibility as a result of the so-called “One Big Beautiful Bill” – including new restrictions on non-citizens’ eligibility for SNAP. The guidance was issued nearly four months after the underlying law took effect and became binding the very next day, leaving states almost no time to implement the guidance. In the guidance, USDA incorrectly states that several categories of migrants, including legal permanent residents who were admitted as refugees, people granted asylum, and individuals brought to safety through humanitarian parole programs, are categorically “not eligible” for SNAP. 

AG Campbell and the coalition emphasize that, under federal law, refugees and individuals granted asylum or humanitarian parole become eligible for SNAP as soon as they obtain lawful permanent residence status. Many of these individuals obtain their green cards within their first few years in the United States, immediately making them eligible for SNAP. The attorneys general argue that USDA’s failure to acknowledge this pathway leaves states with instructions that could cause them to illegally deny food assistance to thousands of families. 

The attorneys general also raise concerns about USDA’s erroneous characterization of the federal five-year waiting period for SNAP eligibility that applies to some lawful permanent residents. Under federal law, refugees, asylees, people whose deportation has been withheld, and others are exempt from this requirement and become eligible for SNAP as soon as they receive a green card. The USDA has recognized these exemptions for decades. The new guidance, however, wrongly removes these groups from the exemption list, directly contradicting federal statutes and USDA’s own regulations. 

Additionally, federal regulations give states a 120-day grace period after new guidance is issued so they can adjust to new requirements without facing severe financial penalties. With this guidance, however, USDA is now claiming that this grace period ended on November 1, just one day after the guidance was released, and before states even had a business day to review it. AG Campbell and the coalition explain that the immediate imposition of onerous penalties on states contradicts USDA’s own rules, which make clear that the 120-day period cannot begin until new guidance is actually issued. By ignoring this requirement, USDA is putting states at risk of major penalties for errors created entirely by the agency’s own delay and inaccuracies. 

The coalition is calling on USDA to immediately correct these legal mistakes; clarify that refugees, asylees, and individuals admitted through humanitarian parole programs may qualify for SNAP once they become lawful permanent residents; accurately list the humanitarian groups exempt from the five-year waiting period; and provide a lawful explanation of how the five-year rule works. They also demand that USDA recognize that the 120-day transition period began on the date the guidance was issued, so that no state is penalized for confusion caused by USDA’s flawed and delayed instructions. 

Joining AG Campbell in sending this letter are the attorneys general of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawai’i, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia. 

###