Obtained food service equipment from the former high school building for his own use; also paid $512 to the Town of Norwood\n\nThe State Ethics Commission (\u201cCommission\u201d) approved a Disposition Agreement (\u201cAgreement\u201d) in which former Norwood School Committee Chairman Mark Joseph (\u201cJoseph\u201d) admitted to violating G.L. c. 268A, the conflict of interest law, by having school employees \u00a0transport surplus cafeteria equipment to his privately owned restaurant. \u00a0Pursuant to the Agreement, Joseph paid a $5,000 civil penalty, and also reimbursed the Town of Norwood (\u201cTown\u201d) $511.76 for the costs of using public school custodians and vehicles to move the equipment.\n\nAccording to the Agreement, the Town\u2019s high school was scheduled to be demolished to make way for a new building in 2011.\u00a0 School employees were advised to use color-coded labels to mark equipment that would be moved to other district schools or Town agencies. \u00a0On or about June 23, 2011, Joseph contacted school administrators to ask if he could take some of the cafeteria equipment and donate it to the Norwood Food Pantry, a local charity. \u00a0Joseph was directed to contact the management company overseeing the construction project, and to speak with the high school principal\u2019s secretary for assistance.\n\nOn June 24, 2011, Joseph went to the high school principal\u2019s office and spoke with the secretary about his plans. \u00a0He also left a voicemail message for the management company contact person about the equipment. \u00a0The secretary gave Joseph labels to write his name and \u201cfood pantry\u201d on any items he wished to have donated. \u00a0The secretary stated that she would not have provided the labels if Joseph had not been a School Committee member. \u00a0Joseph never spoke to the management company contact person, nor did he receive permission from the project manager, the Norwood Public Schools (NPS) Superintendent or the School Committee to take the equipment for non-school purposes.\n\nJoseph marked warming tables, cold serving tables, steel tables, 16-crate capacity milk coolers, a folding transition table, a fire extinguisher and 40-gallon trash barrels with labels reading \u201cMark Joseph \u2013 Food Pantry.\u201d \u00a0That same day, Joseph obtained the assistance of six NPS custodians to transport the equipment during their regular work hours to The Take Away, a Norwood restaurant owned by Joseph. Two or three of the items were placed inside the restaurant, and the rest were put in a storage closet in the basement of the building. None of the equipment was ever brought to the Norwood Food Pantry, which had no use for the equipment, since it distributes only canned goods and does not serve warm or chilled foods. \u00a0Joseph claimed that he planned to give any equipment the food pantry did not want to The Abundant Table, another local charity, but admitted that he had not contacted either charity prior to removing the items from the high school.\n\nThe NPS Superintendent learned about the equipment move and instructed Joseph to return all the items to the school the next day, a job that required two NPS custodians working overtime as well as a school-owned truck. \u00a0The equipment was then turned over to a salvage company.\u00a0 \u00a0The NPS Superintendent valued the equipment at $2,950, and the costs incurred by the Town for the custodians to transport the equipment to be $511.76.\n\nJoseph resigned from the School Committee approximately one week after the incident.\n\nSection 23(b)(2)(ii) of G.L. c. 268A prohibits a municipal employee from knowingly, or with reason to know, using or attempting to use his official position to secure for himself or others unwarranted privileges or exemptions which are of substantial value and which are not properly available to similar situated individuals. \u00a0By using his position as School Committee Chairman to acquire the school kitchen equipment for his own private use and to use Town resources to transport the equipment, Joseph violated the conflict of interest law.