When you left your position at the General Court, you became a former state employee for purposes of G.L. c. 268A, the conflict of interest statute. Sections 5 and 23(c) of G.L. c. 268A apply to your activities as a former state employee. In particular, G.L. c. 268A, § 5 contains a one year prohibition on former state employees acting as a legislative agent. It provides:
"[A] former state employee or elected official, including a former member of the general court, who acts as legislative agent, as defined in section thirty-nine of chapter three, for anyone other than the commonwealth or a state agency before the governmental body with which he has been associated, within one year after he leaves that body . . . shall be punished by a fine of not more than three thousand dollars or by imprisonment for not more than two years, or both." G.L. c. 268A, § 5(e) and § 5(f).
In turn, G.L. c. 3, § 39 defines a "legislative agent" as follows:
"[A] person who for compensation or reward does any act to promote, oppose or influence legislation, or to promote, oppose or influence the governor's approval or veto thereof. The term 'legislative agent' shall include a person who, as part of his regular and usual business or professional activities and not simply incidental thereto, attempts to promote, oppose or influence legislation, or the governor's approval or veto thereof, whether or not any compensation in addition to the salary for such activities is received for such services; provided, however, that for purposes of this definition a person shall be presumed to engage in activity covered by this definition in a manner that is simply incidental to his regular and usual business or professional activities if he engages in any activity or activities covered by this definition for not more than fifty hours during any reporting period or receives less than five thousand dollars during any reporting period for any activity or activities covered by this definition."
We first recognize that there are federal and state constitutional rights related to an individual's right to petition government [1] and advocate a position with government that a former state employee does not forego simply by virtue of that status. Such activities are appropriate and necessary parts of the democratic process. G.L. c. 268A, § 5(e) does not prohibit a person from engaging in these activities; rather, it restricts a former state employee from receiving compensation for performing such outside activities before the governmental body with which that person served.
The conflict of interest law was "enacted as part of 'comprehensive legislation ... [to] strike at corruption in public office, inequality of treatment of citizens and the use of public office for private gain." [2] The conflict of interest statute is prophylactic in nature, where the Legislature's objective "was as much to prevent giving the appearance of conflict as to suppress all tendency to wrongdoing." [3]
More specifically, G. L. c. 268A, § 5(e) was enacted in 1978 as part of an effort to strengthen the public's confidence in its officials. [4] The purpose of the § 5(e) restriction is to ensure that the democratic process is not skewed to give a former state employee an undue advantage in his or her legislative agent activities. As the Commission has previously noted, "[t]he purpose of G.L. c. 268A, § 5(e) [i]s to establish a one-year cooling off period for former state employees who might otherwise be in a position to take undue lobbying advantage of former associates whose loyalties they acquired as state employees." [5]
In short, the critical policy interest that § 5(e) guards against is allowing a former state employee, for compensation, to trade upon loyalty and contacts that he or she has gained by virtue of his or her official position. Among the ways that a person might take undue lobbying advantage of a former associate is by personally appealing to a former colleague's loyalty, drawing on private loyalty through a lobbying associate when the former colleague is aware of that association, and advising or directing a client, another employee of your organization, or a lobbying associate, through use of insider or special knowledge of people or processes.
Implicit within your request, are two separate questions: 1) whether the activities you describe constitute acting as a "legislative agent," as defined in G.L. c. 3, § 39, and 2) whether these actions are "before the governmental body" with which you were associated so that they fall into the one year prohibition established in G.L. c. 268A, § 5(e).
We first address the question of what activities, for purposes of G.L. c. 268A, constitute the acts of a legislative agent. In doing so, we focus on the first portion of the definition of "legislative agent" in G.L. c. 3, § 39: "A person who for compensation or reward does any act to promote, oppose or influence legislation, or to promote, oppose or influence the governor's approval or veto thereof."
We begin our analysis by examining the plain language of the statute. When interpreting a statute, we do so according to the intent of the legislature ascertained from all its words construed by ordinary and approved usage of language, considered in connection with the cause of its enactment, mischief or imperfection to be remedied and the main object to be accomplished. [6] When the words are clear and, when assigned their ordinary meaning, yield a workable and logical result, we interpret the statute without resort to extrinsic aids, such as legislative history. [7]
"Any" has been defined, in relevant part, as "one or more indiscriminately of whatever kind," or "any thing or things: any part, quantity, or number." [8] "The word any is generally used in the sense of 'all' or 'every' and its meaning is most comprehensive." [9] To "act" commonly means "to produce a desired effect: perform the function for which designed or employed" or "to exert power or influence." [10]
We conclude that the language is clear and unambiguous. Based upon the plain meaning of the statute, all actions undertaken with the purpose of promoting, opposing or influencing legislation or the governor's approval or veto thereof are the types of activities in which a legislative agent engages. Thus, provided that a person engages in such acts "for compensation or reward," that person will be acting as a legislative agent for purposes of G.L. c. 268A when they engage in any of the activities mentioned above, whether that activity is labeled as public advocacy, strategic lobbying, or direct lobbying. [11]
We next turn to the question of what it means to act as a legislative agent "before the governmental body" with which you were associated, as prohibited by G.L. c. 268A, § 5(e). Absent a specific precedent on the meaning of a word or phrase in a statute, we are guided by accepted principles of construction, including the principle of relating the words in question to the associated words and phrases in the statutory context. [12]
The phrase "before the governmental body" modifies the phrase "acts as legislative agent." The word "before" commonly means "in the presence of" or "in sight or notice of" or "face to face with." [13] Although the term "governmental body" [14] is defined neither in G.L. c. 268A, § 5(e) nor in the definition provisions of G.L. c. 268A, § 1, the Commission has previously concluded that the General Court intended that the definition in G.L. c. 268B, § 1(h) apply to § 5(e). [15]
Guided by the prophylactic purpose of the statute as well as the language and purpose of § 5(e), we conclude that the statute prohibits you from both directly lobbying your former governmental body by direct contact or communication, and also from indirectly lobbying that body through a member or individual who is closely connected to your private organization whom you have advised, directed, or strategized with to influence legislation. Such persons could include a client, another employee of your organization, or a lobbying associate. In the latter case, where your legislative agent activity comes before your former governmental body, even if through another person within or closely connected with your private organization, we conclude that you would in fact be acting as a legislative agent before that body, contrary to § 5(e). You would be engaging in "behind the scenes" legislative agent activity that you could not otherwise engage in personally before your former governmental body. Further, in each instance, you would be using private knowledge of past personal associations within your former governmental body to benefit your current employer or client.
Thus, G.L. c. 268A, § 5(e) prohibits you from engaging in direct lobbying activity, including directly communicating with or contacting a member or employee of the General Court, whether in person, by telephone, or in writing. Additionally, we conclude that authorizing a third party to use your name in connection with legislative agent acts constitutes acting as legislative agent before your former governmental body. Furthermore, we conclude that personally introducing an employee of your private organization or a citizen activist to a member of the General Court is also impermissible under G.L. c. 268A, § 5(e). [16]
Furthermore, G.L. c. 268A, § 5(e) prohibits you from receiving compensation to engage in "strategic lobbying" where you direct, advise, or strategize with a member or other closely connected individual within your private organization, such as a client, another employee of your organization, or a lobbying associate, who will in turn take the information you provide and lobby members or employees of your former governmental body. In these circumstances, your legislative agent activities are, even if through these other parties, before your former governmental body. Additionally, such activities violate the policy purpose of the statute by placing you in a position to take undue lobbying advantage of a former colleague's loyalty. If you, for example, strategize with another employee in your organization on who or how to lobby, draft letters that will go to specific legislators, or otherwise have direct input or a degree of control into the message or over the messenger, circumstances are ripe for you to take advantage of insider information or special knowledge gained by virtue of your former position and otherwise appeal to a former colleague's loyalty. In these circumstances, your inside knowledge may give you unequal access in the halls of government, permitting you to use your former public office for private gain and causing public confidence to be eroded in the decision-making process. [17]
We conclude, however, that § 5(e) does not prohibit you from engaging in paid, public advocacy activities intended to influence legislation, provided that you do not do so on the grounds of your former governmental body, as discussed below. You may permissibly engage in public advocacy provided that it is intended to influence public opinion on a piece of legislation rather than directly influence the General Court. Grassroots public advocacy that involves public education or shaping public opinion is fundamentally distinct from a situation where you advise, direct, or strategize with a client, employee, or inner circle of associates who in turn carry out your legislative strategy before the General Court.
If, for example, you hold a press conference about pending legislation that is broadcast by television and a member or employee of the General Court later sees it, we do not consider this to be a legislative agent activity that is "before" your former governmental body. Such an activity would not violate either the language or the purpose of G.L. c. 268A, § 5(e) in that it would not put you in a position to take undue advantage of former colleagues or put you in a position to use insider information.
Additionally, we conclude that the statutory language as well as the underlying purpose of G.L. c. 286A, § 5(e) do not prohibit you from engaging in other "grassroots," public advocacy activities, including encouraging the public to contact Massachusetts legislators to express views on pending legislation and to engage in letter-writing campaigns to the General Court, provided you do not advise the public on specific strategy, such as which legislators to contact, or what to say or do when a person contacts a legislator. When you engage in "grassroots" public advocacy, your efforts are targeted to influence public opinion on an issue rather than specifically targeting the legislature. We conclude that such activities are not "before" your former governmental body and that, further, your opportunity for capitalizing on personal relationships is sufficiently removed. Prior to engaging in any of these activities, however, you must ensure that you comply with the requirements of G.L. c. 268A, §§ 5(a), [18] 5(b), [19] and 23(c). [20]
We are persuaded, however, that engaging in any direct, indirect, and/or grassroots advocacy for compensation on the grounds of your former governmental body, during the one year after you leave that body, constitutes impermissibly appearing before that body. If, for example, you were invited to give a speech to an activist group in the Great Hall of Flags, we conclude it can be properly said that you are doing so "before" the General Court, as that activity can fairly be said to be "in sight or notice" of the General Court. Furthermore, giving a speech or leading a rally on the State House steps can similarly be considered to be "before" the General Court. Thus, for one year after you leave state employment, G.L. c. 268A, § 5(e) also will prohibit you from being compensated to engage in these types of activities on the grounds of your former governmental body. In these instances, engaging in legislative agent activities so near the heart of where your former governmental body does business, or in a place so integrally related to its work and over which it exerts control, may properly be deemed "before" that body.
In sum, G.L. c. 268A, § 5(e) does not prohibit you from engaging in public advocacy activity, including speaking about legislation to members of the public through press conferences or speeches, and encouraging the public to engage in letter-writing campaigns, provided that you do not do so on the grounds of your former governmental body. Rather, G.L. c. 268A, § 5(e) prohibits you, for compensation and for a period of one year after you leave your position with the Legislature, from directly lobbying your former governmental body, whether in person, in writing, or by telephone, and from "strategically" lobbying where you direct, advise, or strategize with a client, another employee, or individual who is closely connected to your private organization on how to influence your former governmental body.
