You are and attorney in private practice and expect to be hired as a special assistant district attorney in X (name) County. In that capacity you would initiate criminal and injunctive proceedings related to certain activities in a city.
Your salary would be paid by the X County District Attorney and would be attributable in its entirety to a contribution from the city involved to the District Attorney to pay for the legal expenses of the proceedings which would benefit the City.
Can you accept compensation for your services from the District Attorney where your compensation would be attributable in its entirety to a contribution by the City?
As a special assistant district attorney in X County, you would be a state employee under G.L. c. 268A, §l(q). In view of the part-time nature of your proposed employment arrangement, you would be a "special state employee” under G.L. c. 268A., § l (o), and would be subject to the prohibitions of G.L. c. 268A, albeit in a less restrictive way. Under G L. c. 268A, §4 a special state employee may not be paid by someone other than the commonwealth or a state agency if his compensation is in relation to a particular matter l/ (a) in which he has participated2/ as a state employee or (b) which is .or within one year has been a subject of his official responsibility3/ or (c) which is pending in the state agency in which he is serving, provided that he has served for more than sixty days during the prior three hundred and sixty-five day period.
The prohibitions of §4 avoid the conflict of loyalties inherent wherever a state employee serves two masters and restrict state employees from using their status as employees to further their private interests where those interests overlap with the commonwealth's. See, Commission Compliance Letter to the Department of Mental Health 81-21, (July 2,.1981). For example, this section has been applied to prohibit state employees from supplementing their state salaries with contributions from non-state parties. Id., p. 6. The section is designed to prevent a state employee from having to choose between his loyalty to the commonwealth as a state employee and his loyalty to a non-state party which is compensating him in a matter of interest to the state.
However, the Commission has not applied §4 to prohibit a state employee from receiving a commonwealth salary, the funding for which has been derived from a municipal, county or federal source. In such situations, the receipt of such compensation does not reflect either an unwarranted benefit or divided loyalties to which §4 was addressed. Cf. EC-COI-82-118. Moreover, such arrangements are common to state agencies which apply federal grants to the salaries of state employees. As a matter of sound policy, the Commission will be reluctant to adopt constructions of G.L. c. 268A which are at odds with the purposes of the law and which would immediately place large numbers of state employees in violation of §4 by the mere act of receiving their salary from the commonwealth.4/ Compare, Buss, The Massachusetts Conflict of Interest Statute: An Analysis; 45 B.U. Law Rev. 299, 372, n.377(1965) [a literal reading of §7 which would place every state employee in violation of the statute cannot be accepted].
In view of the foregoing, the Commission advises you that §4 was not intended to prohibit the salary arrangement which you have proposed.5/