You are a city councilor in the City of ABC (City). You have been appointed by the Chief of Police to the position of reserve police officer. This appointment was made from a civil service list based on seniority. The position is not funded and has not been funded for the next fiscal year. The city council votes on each budget line item for city departments. In the future, the city council may authorize police reserve officers to be paid. Until the police reserve officers are funded, they will not be called upon for duty.
What limitations does G.L. c. 268A place on your being a city councilor and a reserve police officer for the city?
You are subject to the limitations discussed below.
Initially, the Commission advises you that, as a city councilor, you are a "municipal employee" within the meaning of G.L. c. 268A, § 1(g).[1] For the purposes of the question you pose, the relevant sections of G. L. c. 268A are §§ 19, 20, and 23.
1. Section 19
As a municipal employee, you are subject to the restrictions of G.L. c 268A, § 19(a) which disqualifies you from taking certain actions in your city councilor capacity, specifically, § 19 prohibits you from participating[2] in any particular matter[3] in which you have a financial interest.[4] This section seeks to ensure honesty in government by preventing public employees from advancing their own interest at the expense of the public. Where it is obvious or reasonably foreseeable that your private interest in the reserve police officer position will be affected by your official action, then the provisions of § 19 will apply. See EC-COI-84-98. Consequently, if the police department submitted in its budget to the city council a proposal to fund the reserve officers, you would be prohibited from participating in any vote on the police department budget because you would have a financial interest in reserve officers receiving compensation. Once the police budget has been approved by the other members of the city council, you would be able to participate in a consolidated vote of the entire budget. See Graham v. McGrail, 370 Mass. 133.
2. Section 20
This section prohibits a municipal employee from having a financial interest, directly or indirectly, in a contract made by a municipal agency of the same city in which the city is an interested party. By serving as a city councilor and as a reserve police officer, you would be performing services for two separate "municipal agencies."[5] If you received compensation for the reserve police officer position, you would have a financial interest in a contract within the meaning of § 20. See, In the Matter of Kenneth R. Strong, 1984 Ethics Commission 195. Accordingly, you would be prohibited from maintaining a paid employment arrangement with the police department while you remain a city councilor.[6]
3. Section 23
As a municipal employee, you are subject to the standards of conduct contained in § 23. This section prohibits you from accepting other employment which will impair your independence of judgment in the exercise of your official duties. In this regard, your duties and responsibilities as an elected public official may inherently conflict with your private interest as a reserve police officer. In effect, you have a contract for future employment with the police department. Although it is unclear when police reserve officers will be funded, the likelihood of your employment with another municipal agency inherently clouds your activities as a city councilor. In particular, your ability to participate on the city council in such police matters as collective bargaining, appointments and policy will be affected by your holding the position of reserve police officer. The question will inevitably arise whether you are using your position as city councilor to further the interests of the city, your constituents, the police department, or your own situation as a prospective employee. Additionally, § 23 provides that by your conduct you should not give reasonable basis for the impression that any person can improperly influence or unduly enjoy your favor in the performance of your official duties or that you are unduly affected by the rank, position or influence of any party or person. Your ability to exercise independence of judgment on behalf of the public is undermined by the impression that you may want to favor the police department for your own personal gain as a reserve police officer. You should therefore refrain from participating as a city council member on all matters relating to the police department while you remain eligible for appointment as a reserve police officer.
End Of Decision