Date: | 06/08/1987 |
---|---|
Organization: | State Ethics Commission |
Location: | Boston, MA |
A selectman whose son is a patrolman in the police department may not approve collective bargaining agreements which include salary increases for patrolmen.
Date: | 06/08/1987 |
---|---|
Organization: | State Ethics Commission |
Location: | Boston, MA |
A selectman whose son is a patrolman in the police department may not approve collective bargaining agreements which include salary increases for patrolmen.
You are a member of the Board of Selectmen of a Town. Your son is a patrolman with the twenty member Town police department and is interested in a promotion
Page 155
to sergeant. The patrolmen are represented by a union; the sergeants are not organized and negotiate informally with the Town. You state that the salary of the sergeants is not tied to or otherwise dependent on the base salary of or increases negotiated by patrolmen.
In view of your son's status as a police officer, what limitations does G.L. c. 268A place on your participation as selectman in police department matters?
You are subject to the restrictions discussed below.
This section prohibits you from participating [1] in any particular matter [2] in which your son has a financial interest. Graham v. McGrail, 370 Mass. 133 (1976). Included within the prohibition are all votes, decisions, determinations and contracts in which your son has a reasonably foreseeable financial interest. For example, you may not approve a collective bargaining agreement which provides for a salary increase for your son and other patrolmen. You must also refrain from any decisions relating to the reappointment or promotion of your son.
On the other hand, the s.19 abstention requirement does not extend to all police department matters but only to those matters in which your son has a reasonably foreseeable financial interest. EC-COI-84-98. For example, you are not required to abstain from deciding whether to appoint new patrolmen or to reappoint regular and special police officers (aside from your son), matrons and the chief because your son does not have a financial interest in these decisions. For the same reason, you may participate in decisions concerning the salary for the police chief and matrons, inasmuch as the salary of police officers is negotiated independently of these salary levels.
If your son is promoted to sergeant, you will no longer be prohibited from participating in decisions relating to your son's financial interest as a patrolman. The prohibition, however, will apply to your participation in matters such as contracts and decisions affecting your son's financial interest as a sergeant.
In addition to s.19, your participation in police matters must also satisfy the standards of con duct contained in s.23. Section 23 prohibits you from:
1. using your official position to secure unwarranted privileges or exemptions of substantial value for your son (s.23(b)(2)); or
2. engaging in conduct which creates a reasonable impression that your son or the police department will unduly enjoy your favor (s.23(b)(3)).
By making a public disclosure of the fact that your son is a member of the police department, you will dispel any impression of undue favoritism under s.23(b)(3). You must bear in mind the standards of s.23 whenever you participate as a Selectman in matters affecting the police department. For example, your decision concerning the retention of or salary of the chief must be based on objective standards and cannot be based on how well or how poorly your son has been treated by the chief. You must also continue to comply with the confidentiality restrictions of s. 23(c) by not disclosing to your son any confidential information relating to the Town's bargaining strategy in its collective bargaining negotiations with the patrolmen's bargaining unit.