The Commission denied a Fire Captain candidate's request to investigate HRD's decision to immediately apply a recent law change regarding eligibility to sit for promotional examinations as HRD provided sufficient notice in the exam poster and uniformly applied the new requirements.
Reclassification appeal denied. The Appellant was unable to show that she performed the level distinguishing duties of an Auditor IV a majority of the time.
The Town's use of a de facto assessment center without authorization from HRD and other procedural flaws resulted in the Appellant's bypass appeal being allowed.
The Commission denied the parties' joint request for 310 relief and dismissed the Appellant's bypass appeal based in part that the appeal was not timely filed with the Commission.
