The Commission dismissed the reclassification appeal of a Department of Transitional Assistance Management Analyst as it did not qualify as a reclassification appeal and the Commission had no jurisdiction over the matter.
Reclassification appeal denied. The Appellant was unable to show that she performed the level distinguishing duties of a Personnel Analyst III a majority of the time.
Reclassification appeal denied. The Appellant was unable to show that she performed the level distinguishing duties of a Child Support Enforcement Specialist II a majority of the time.
Reclassification appeal denied. The Appellant was unable to show that he performed the level distinguishing duties of a Environmental Analyst IV a majority of the time.
The Commission allowed UMass Amherst’s Motion to Dismiss a UMass electrician’s reclassification appeal as pay grades are a collective bargaining issue over which the Commission lacks jurisdiction.
The Commission dismissed the reclassification appeal of three water management employees within the Industrial Instructor series at MCI Norfolk given that none of the employees performed the core aspect of their classification series that is any kind of instruction of inmates.
The Commission denied the reclassification appeal of a MCAD Program Coordinator I given that the appeal was as an attempt to justify a former MCAD Chairwoman's impermissible request of promotion and pay raise, and that there was no indication that the duties of Program Coordinator II a majority of the time.
The Commission denied an appeal by a Storekeeper III at the Department of Correction for reclassification to Storekeeper IV given that although their responsibilities were consistent with that of the retired superior, the retired superior's responsibilities were consistent with Storekeeper III and Storekeeper II.
