Decision

Decision Fernandes, Robin v. State Board of Retirement (CR-17-942), Order Denying Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration

Date: 06/08/2018
Organization: Division of Administrative Law Appeals
Docket Number: CR-17-942
  • Petitioner: Robin Fernandes
  • Respondent: State Board of Retirement
  • Appearance for Petitioner: Robin Fernandes
  • Appearance for Respondent: Melinda E. Troy
  • Administrative Magistrate: Angela McConney Scheepers

Table of Contents

Order Denying Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration

On June 6, 2018, Robin Fernandes submitted a document to the Division of Administrative Law Appeals (DALA) after the agency had adjudicated her matter on June 1, 2018. I hereby consider that document as a Motion for Reconsideration. 801 C.M.R. 1.01(7)(l).

After careful consideration, Ms. Fernandes’ Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.

801 C.M.R. 1.01(7)(l) provides for the filing of motions for reconsideration and reads:

After a decision has been rendered and before the expiration of the time for filing a request for review or appeal, a Party may move for reconsideration. The motion must identify a clerical or mechanical error in the decision or a significant factor the Agency or the Presiding Officer may have overlooked in deciding the case. A motion for reconsideration shall be deemed a motion for rehearing in accordance with M.G.L. c. 30A, § 14(1) for the purposes of tolling the time for appeal.

The Petitioner’s motion does not identify a clerical or mechanical error in the decision or a significant factor that was over looked.  See Mary Morse v. State Board of Retirement, CR-13-491 at 2 (CRAB 12/21/2016).  Rather, the Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration repeats the argument she made previously, and is identical to her April 11, 2018 Pre-Hearing Memorandum and the subsequent addenda. Ms. Fernandes fails to address the issue of jurisdiction, although the issue was raised in the DALA March 9, 2018 First Pre-Hearing Order and was the subject of the State Board of Retirement’s May 18, 2018 Motion to Dismiss.

Ms. Fernandes’ appeal was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and her motion for reconsideration is denied.   

SO ORDERED.

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW APPEALS

 

Angela McConney Scheepers

Administrative Magistrate

 

DATED: June 8, 2018

Downloads for CR-17-942 Fernandes, Robin v. State Board of Retirement (CR-17-942), Order Denying Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration

Feedback

Did you find what you were looking for on this webpage? * required
We use your feedback to help us improve this site but we are not able to respond directly. Please do not include personal or contact information. If you need a response, please locate the contact information elsewhere on this page or in the footer.
We use your feedback to help us improve this site but we are not able to respond directly. Please do not include personal or contact information. If you need a response, please locate the contact information elsewhere on this page or in the footer.

If you need to report child abuse, any other kind of abuse, or need urgent assistance, please click here.

Feedback