A. In General
When writing the Report, the following conventions should be used:
- Make use of bold type and underlining and/or headings to identify sources
- Number the pages
- Provide specific dates or time frames if possible
- Avoid use of “on 1 or 2 occasions.” Use specific dates whenever they are known
- Avoid use of “in the past.” Be specific
- Identify sources of statements
- Include dates for all events, including but not limited to, all interviews, home visits, and visitation between parents and child
- Define all medical/psychiatric terms using a medical dictionary or a current edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
B. The Outline of the Report
The following is a suggested outline for the Report. This outline is offered to help the court investigator present the information in an orderly, complete, and easily accessible manner. The outline also provides the court investigator with the kinds and quantity of information to be contained in the Report. The data should be presented in the order that makes the most sense logically for a particular case. The court investigator should state the facts with respect to each category of information and refrain from using evaluative terms. The outline is not exhaustive as the facts of each case are unique and may require the review of additional factors or sections. Further, this outline may identify issues that are not relevant to a particular case being investigated. If a section of the outline is not germane to a particular case, it should not be included in the Report.
1. Case Caption
- Case Name
- Docket Number
- County
- Division
2. Parties
- Names
- Addresses of the parties, including the child, unless in foster care, and any putative father(s)
- Dates of birth
If there are multiple children who have different mothers and fathers, putative or otherwise, identify which children relate to which parents.
3. Statement of current allegations from 51A and 51B reports, DCF affidavit and DCF court reports, if any
Actual reports and affidavits may not be copied and pasted into the Report.
4. Parents’ background and history
- Marital status including history of present and past marriages; dates of divorce
- Relationship with spouse/partner
- Education history
- Employment history
- Source of any income or financial assistance
- Religion, if known
- Cultural considerations including Native American heritage issues
- Physical status - ailments; substance use disorder
- Psychological status - mental health (including diagnosis, treatment, medication history)
- Impulse control and response to stress
- Relationship with extended family
- Relationship with supports
- Relationship with an individual child (note any paternity issues)
- Prior history, if any, with any state or private social service agency, court, police including, but not limited to:
i. Chronological history of G. L. c. 119, § 51As and 51Bs – when, where, filed by whom, investigated by whom, allegation(s), whether substantiated/unsubstantiated, recommendation
ii. Chronological history of any G. L. c. 209A or c. 258E actions, temporary restraining orders, violations of 209A or 258E orders
iii. Court proceedings, including prior C&P and Termination of Parental Rights (TPR) cases and outcomes
iv. Criminal record, including records of other states, if available
- Each parent’s view of C&P allegation(s)
- Each parent’s view of the child’s character and needs
- Action plan tasks, details and compliance/non-compliance with each task relative to each parent)
5. Each child on the petition
i. Attendance
ii. Appearance
iii. Behavior
iv. Grades
v. Relationships in school
vi. Early intervention, special education (I.E.P or other accommodations) and other evaluations
viii. IQ, if available
i. Duration
ii. Behavior
iii. Attitude
iv. Verbal and behavioral reaction before and after visitation with parents and/or siblings
v. Relationship with and attitude/behavior toward foster parent(s) and other adults in the foster home
vi. Relationship with and attitude/behavior toward any other child in the foster home
vii. Nature, level and quality of communication with parents
- Nature of alleged parental abuse/neglect
i. Sexual abuse
ii. Physical abuse and/or neglect
iii. Emotional abuse and/or neglect
iv. Educational neglect
v. Lack of supervision; placing child in high-risk situations
vi. Abandonment
vii. Unsanitary/unsafe living conditions in the family home
- Effect of abusive or neglectful treatment on the child
i. Impact on educational status, if any
ii. Social/Emotional/Psychological/Behavioral status
iii. Physical health
- Relationship with parents including step-parents or extended family members
i. Nature of relationship prior to removal
ii. Nature and quality of visitation or other contact with parents and/or step-parents
iii. Nature and quality of visitation or other contact with extended family members
- Relationship with siblings
i. Nature of relationship (before and after removal)
Time spent living together—type, extent, and quality of relationship
If not in same placement, type, extent, and quality of visitation if applicable; note any court orders regarding sibling visitation
ii. Siblings’ expressed desire to live together
iii. Siblings’ expressed desire for visitation if living together is not feasible
iv. Child’s preference for placement
- Child’s view of family, self and situation (if age appropriate)
- Child’s feelings about:
i. Parents
ii. Extended family, if appropriate
iii. Reunification
iv. Adoption, guardianship, other possible permanent plan
- Action plan tasks, details and compliance/non-compliance with each task, relative to each child
6. Other caretakers, if applicable, including proposed caretaker(s)
- Name(s) (To protect substitute caretakers not known to parents, use first initial of last name only. Ex. Ms. M)
- Address(es) (To protect substitute caretakers not known to parents, addresses may be excluded.)
- Date(s) of birth
- Time spent living with the child in present care and protection case
- Marital status including history or present and past marriages; dates of divorce/separation
- Relationship with spouse/partner
- Last grade of education
- Employment history
- Source and amount of any income or financial assistance
- Religion, if known, and religious considerations, if any
- Cultural considerations
- Physical status - ailments; substance use disorder
- Psychological status; mental health
- Impulse control & response to stress
- Relationship with extended family
- Relationship with supports
- Relationship with their children, if any, and the child on the petition
- Prior history, if any, with any state or private social service agency, court, police including, but not limited to:
i. Chronological history of G. L. c. 119, § 51As – when, where, by whom, allegation, whether substantiated/unsubstantiated, recommendation
ii. Chronological history of any G. L. c. 209A or 258E actions, temporary restraining orders, violations of 209A or 258E orders
iii. Court proceedings
iv. Criminal record, including records of other states, if available
- Caretaker’(s) view of allegation(s) in the care and protection petition
- Caretaker’(s) view of the child’s character and needs
- Caretaker's ability to advocate for and participate in any services provided to the child in their care
7. Any Minor Child of the respondent mother and father not included in the petition.
i. Name
ii. Present address, unless in foster care
iii. Age and date of birth
iv. Mother
v. Father (note any paternity issues)
i. Attendance
ii. Appearance
iii. Behavior
iv. Grades
v. Relationships in school
vi. Special education needs, if any
vii. IQ, if available
- Special needs
- Medical needs
- Psychological needs
- Prescribed medication
- Other court proceedings
- With whom the child is living. If not with parents, why not?
- Explain why the child is not included on the petition.
8. Extended Family Information
- Maternal/paternal grandparents, if living
i. Name(s)
ii. Address(es)
iii. Information or knowledge about the allegations in the petition, and care of the child
iv. Interest in helping family, including financially
v. Willingness and capacity to care for the child
- Maternal/paternal aunts and uncles (See factors (i) - (v) above relative to grandparents)
- Adult siblings (See factors (i) - (v) above relative to grandparents)
9. Parenting Skill and Abilities (How the parent provides for the child)
- Child’s nutrition
- Child’s clothing (cleanliness and appropriateness for time of year)
- Family Housing (describe setting)
- Education of the child
i. Parental involvement and interest in school/daycare
ii. Parent’s explanation for any school related problems
iii. Level of parental understanding and support for child’s educational needs
- Medical/Physical/Psychological Welfare of Child – parents’ ability to provide for:
i. Medical/psychological care
ii. Emotional care
iii. Physical care
iv. Level of parental understanding and support for child’s medical, psychological, emotional, or physical needs
- Cultural considerations
- Religious considerations
- Visitation and communication with the child
i. Attendance at visits, if problems, describe in detail (including date(s))
ii. Interaction with the child – describe in detail (including date(s))
iii. Affection/attention
iv. Ability to set appropriate limits
v. Ability to communicate with children
vi. Ability to communicate with visitation supervisors
vii. Ability to appropriately stimulate the child
viii. Ability to feed the child
ix. Ability to assist the child in toileting
- If court investigator observed visit(s) between parent and child:
i. When, where, arranged by whom
ii. Parent and child present
iii. Describe visit, especially parent/child interactions in detail
10. Parental Involvement with DCF
- Level of cooperation
- Position regarding action plan
- Motivation to utilize services
- Capacity to utilize services
- Previous experiences with other children
- Willingness and ability to modify behavior that led to filing of care and protection petition
11. Parental Compliance with, Attitude toward, and Benefit(s) from Recommended Treatment Programs and Evaluation
- Psychotherapy
- Drug/Alcohol Evaluation/Counseling
- Domestic Violence Counseling/Intimate Partner Abuse Education Program
- Homemaker/Home Health Aide
- Parenting Program
- Cooperation with any court-ordered evaluation, including Court Clinic evaluation, parenting evaluation, substance use disorder evaluation, etc.
C. The Report Shall Be Thorough, Professional, and Contain Accurate Information
Specifically, the Report should:
- provide current information and relevant history rather than merely relying upon, incorporating, photo copying, scanning or copying and pasting prior existing reports
- reflect a balanced picture of the family, listing all positive and negative information relevant to the case
- utilize all available relevant sources. The importance of contacting all known collaterals cannot be overemphasized
- be as factual as possible. Primary source information is preferable to secondary source information. Opinions and conclusions of the court investigator should be limited to the summary and recommendation sections of the Report
Example: If the Department of Children and Families (DCF) social worker informs the court investigator that a physician provided information to the worker, the court investigator not only should include the DCF worker’s statement, but should also contact the physician to verify the information from its primary source. This verification should be mentioned in the Report.
- explain and discuss medical, psychiatric, and social conditions in language understandable to the average layperson
- state the child’s needs in detail
- have a professional appearance. It should not contain spelling or grammatical errors and the Report should be paginated
D. The Report Should Not Be Biased
When writing the Report, the court investigator should give a balanced presentation that includes parents’ strengths and weaknesses. It should also include any relevant information that is factual, but which may not support the court investigator’s conclusions.
Specifically:
- Avoid describing the family in derogatory or judgmental terms
- Avoid incorporating statements from sources that contain negative data in judgmental terms
- Exclude biases of any of the parties toward DCF as a whole or toward any specific area office or social worker. The purpose of the investigation is to provide the court with information pertaining to the specific child and family before the court. Positive and negative interactions between any of the parties and DCF may be included if relevant as well as any of the facts regarding actions or inactions of DCF
- Seek out sources who may have differing viewpoints
- Consult any sources offered by the parents
E. Reported Information Should Be Descriptive Not Evaluative
The information contained in the Report should be descriptive (an observation or statement that contains no judgment), and not evaluative (an observation or statement that reflects an attitude or opinion). If a source’s comment is evaluative rather than descriptive, attempt to clarify the statement or have the source be more specific. Reports (in contrast to guardian ad litem reports) are factual and not evaluative in nature. Nevertheless, a court investigator may include statements of opinion as long as the source of the opinion is identified.
Example #1: An improper evaluative statement would be “The apartment was filthy.”
A proper descriptive statement would be “The kitchen sink was filled with dishes covered with dried food and there were dozens of flies and roaches in the apartment."
Example #2: An improper evaluative statement would be "Father is a well-known drunk.”
A proper descriptive statement from an identified source would be “I saw father yesterday on the street; he was unable to stand and was slurring his words.”
F. Sources Should Be Easily Identifiable
The Report should clearly show the following for each factual allegation:
- who the source of the information is or the type of record reviewed
- what the source’s position is and the source’s relationship is to the family
- when the information was obtained or person interviewed (specific dates)
- how the information was obtained
- why the source is important
- proper attribution, i.e., “Nurse Ruth Smith, the child’s nurse at Children’s Hospital on June 6, 2011, said that...” rather than “Hospital staff said that . . .”
G. Facts Should Be Separated from Conclusions and Other Personal Views Held by the Court Investigator
Only the facts should be contained in the body of the Report. Expert witness or professional opinion information, if any, should be included in separate paragraphs within the body of the investigation so that such information and the identity of the person who provided it are clear. The court investigator’s opinions, if any, should be confined to the summary and recommendations sections of the Report. The Report should never include conclusory statements as to whether DCF (or other petitioner) has met its burden.
H. Information That Could Pose Risks to a Parent or Child
Certain information may arise during the course of the investigation, which if included in the Report, could pose safety risks or dangers to a parent or the child involved in a case, especially if there is evidence of domestic violence. However, it is important to bring that information to the attention of the court. In instances where the court investigator believes that including the information in the Report likely would be dangerous, the court investigator may request a hearing before the court to bring the matter to the attention of the judge and attorneys in the case.
I. Hearsay
Hearsay is an out-of-court statement made by a person that is offered by another to prove the truth of the matter asserted. For example, anything that is reported to the court investigator by a source, which is then incorporated by the court investigator into the Report, is hearsay. Totem-pole hearsay is an out-of-court statement made by a declarant to another individual who then reports it to a third person who offers it in court for the truth of the matter asserted. One example of totem-pole hearsay would be a neighbor reporting to the court investigator that she overheard the child, who is the subject of the care and protection proceeding, say that her bruises came from a beating by her parent.
Generally, hearsay is not admissible as evidence in a court proceeding. However, there are certain exceptions. Hearsay, including totem-pole hearsay and hearsay from a child, is allowed in the Report in care and protection proceedings. The hearsay exception for Reports exists “because of the importance of providing needed information to the court.” Custody of Tracy, 31 Mass. App. Ct. 481, 484 (1991). The admissibility of the Report also recognizes the difficulty and time constraints inherent in collecting adequate confidential information to be presented at the adjudicatory hearing. Id. Furthermore, it permits the judge to “steer as wide a course as possible” through all of the information presented regarding the fitness of parents. Id. at 485.
The Report “should be limited to factual information collected from identified sources in order to permit a fair cross-examination of the court investigator as to all contributions to his/her Report.” See Custody of Tracy, 31 Mass. App. Ct. at 487. This provides the parties with an opportunity to adequately challenge any material in the investigation with evidence of his/her own or to call any contributor to the Report. Care and Protection of Leo, 38 Mass. App. Ct. 237, 243 (1995).
For hearsay contained in a Report to withstand a motion to strike, the parties must be afforded an opportunity to refute the court investigator and the court investigator’s sources through cross examination and other means. Therefore, all out-of-court statements in the Report must be attributed to specific named sources by the court investigator in the Report. Whether a hearsay statement in a Report will be allowed to stand or will be stricken is for the court to decide. The obligation of the court investigator is to include any such statement, if relevant, in the Report, and the identity of its source.
Under the law there is no distinction between levels of hearsay as to their inclusion in a Report. Therefore, court investigators should report totem-pole hearsay so long as there is an identified source capable of being cross-examined as to each level of the hearsay. Custody of Michel, 28 Mass. App. Ct. at 266. It is reasonable to assume that as a part of the investigation, a court investigator will talk to neighbors, teachers, social workers, mental health workers, relatives and friends, who will describe what they heard from other persons. Id. Such other persons, as well as the person interviewed, must be clearly identified, by name, as the source of the information provided to ensure admissibility. Although the inclusion of hearsay in a Report is expected and permitted, it is recommended that the court investigator seek to confirm any totem-pole hearsay information from the primary source of the information.
Pursuant to G. L. c. 119, § 24, a Report not only is admissible as evidence in a care and protection proceeding, despite the fact that it includes hearsay, but also “shall be a part of the [court] record.” (Note the mandatory language in § 24 and Juv. Ct. R. 14(C).) Custody of Jennifer, 25 Mass. App. Ct. 241, 245 (1988); Custody of Michel, 28 Mass. App. Ct. 260, 265 (1990); see also Adoption of Astrid, 45 Mass. App. Ct. 538, 546 further rev. den’d, 428 Mass.1109, (1998) (no error in admitting Report in a proceeding to dispense with consent to adoption, including opinions, recommendations, and conclusions, where court investigator testified, her sources were identified and the parents had an opportunity to rebut any adverse or erroneous material). See also Mass. G. Evid. § 1115(c)(1) and note thereto.
J. Summary Section
After the body of the Report is complete, the court investigator may include a section that summarizes key facts. Facts that do not appear in the body of the Report should not be in the summary section.
This section allows the court investigator to state the implications of all the data collected with regard to the petitioner’s allegations and the possible case disposition. It is an opportunity to underline strengths and weaknesses of the family that may not be readily apparent. Furthermore, this section can speak to the willingness and ability of the parents to work on the issues that originally brought them to the attention of the court. The summary section should not be used as an opportunity for the court investigator to discuss whether the court investigator liked or disliked the family or agreed or disagreed with the family lifestyle. It should also not be used to express an opinion as to the fitness/unfitness of the parents and/or best interests of the child.
K. Recommendations
The court investigator’s central function is to bring facts to the attention of the court. However, in some cases, the recommendations of the court investigator also are permitted. See Adoption of Astrid, 45 Mass. App. Ct. 538, 546 (1998) (no error in admitting an Report, including opinions, recommendations, and conclusions, where the court investigator testified, her sources were identified and the parents had the opportunity to rebut any adverse or erroneous material).
The recommendations section, if any, should be consistent with factual data presented in the body of the Report. The ultimate legal question of fitness/unfitness and/or best interests is for the court to decide. Therefore, the court investigator should refrain from recommending that the child be adjudicated “in need of care and protection,” or that parents be found “unfit, or that it is in the best interests of the child to . . .” However, the recommendation section may serve a useful purpose to the court. It may contain recommendations for services that may be helpful to the child and family. In addition, the court investigator may make the court aware of alternatives which DCF, because of policy, regulations, or otherwise, did not present (e.g., that DCF did not approve of X’s home because there are not enough bedrooms per DCF regulations). It is important for the court investigator to have considered what, if any, his/her recommendations are even if they are not included in the Report because the court investigator may be called upon to testify as an expert witness. See G. L. c. 119, §21.