Overview of the Merrimack Valley Regional Transit Authority

This section describes the makeup and responsibilities of the Merrimack Valley Regional Transit Authority

Table of Contents

Regional Transit Authorities

Chapter 161B of the Massachusetts General Laws established regional transit authorities (RTAs) to provide a public transportation system under the control of municipalities. Each RTA supports a number of communities (member communities) and is governed by an advisory board composed of the chief elected officials from those communities. Chapter 161B of the General Laws gives the Commonwealth certain oversight responsibilities, and it defines the process by which RTAs may be formed or expanded within the Commonwealth, as well as the duties, powers, and limitations of these RTAs. This law also outlines the membership of RTA advisory boards and their authority to appoint administrators, approve budgets, and approve significant changes in service fares. Currently, there is a network of 15 RTAs (12 urban and 3 rural) operating in the Commonwealth, in addition to the transit services provided by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA). These RTAs serve a total of 262 cities, suburban municipalities, and rural communities outside the greater Boston area and provide transportation via buses and minibuses operated by private transit service companies. RTAs, which are locally controlled, manage their own operations but must hire private operating companies to provide their services in accordance with Chapter 161B of the General Laws.

Section 53 of Chapter 6C of the General Laws makes the Rail and Transit Division (RTD) of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation “responsible for overseeing, coordinating and planning all transit and rail matters throughout the commonwealth,” including intercity buses, the MBTA, and RTAs. RTD carries out its responsibility of providing and managing financial assistance for RTAs through its Community Transit Program Unit, which oversees the federal, state, and local programs that financially support RTAs. State appropriations for the 15 RTAs increased from approximately $70 million in fiscal year 2014 to approximately $80 million in fiscal years 2016 through 2018.

The Merrimack Valley Regional Transit Authority

The Merrimack Valley Regional Transit Authority (MVRTA) was established on October 11, 1974 and reports to RTD under Chapter 25 of the Acts of 2009, “An Act Modernizing the Transportation Systems of the Commonwealth.” According to its website, “MVRTA’s goal is to provide our passengers with affordable, safe, reliable and convenient transportation services by having well-trained, qualified, and professional staff.” An administrator is responsible for day-to-day administration of the agency, which had three full-time staff members during our audit period. MVRTA’s operations are overseen by an advisory board made up of one member from each of the 16 communities1 the agency serves. The advisory board is responsible for hiring an administrator, setting fares, establishing service levels, and authorizing real-estate purchases. MVRTA contracted with First Transit Incorporated to provide fixed-route and demand-response2 transportation services, including maintenance and administrative functions, for fiscal years 2016 and 2017.

During our audit period, MVRTA’s capital fund expenditures were $5,539,992 for fiscal year 2016 and $5,217,550 for fiscal year 2017. The table below shows the types of capital fund expenditures made by MVRTA.

MVRTA Capital Fund Expenditures

Type of Expenditure

Fiscal Year 2016

Fiscal Year 2017

Building Improvements

$96,418

$902,093

Transit Equipment

4,523,073

3,944,680

Service Vehicles

869,700

101,067

Furniture and Fixtures

50,801

221,050

Electronic Equipment

0

48,660

Total

$5,539,992

$5,217,550

In fiscal years 2016 and 2017, MVRTA received revenue from a variety of sources, including fares from riders and assistance from various federal, state, and local sources. The largest source of funding is state contract assistance,3 followed by Federal Transit Administration (FTA) grants, local assessment4 payments, and fare and terminal revenue. The table below shows the types of funding MVRTA received during the audit period.

MVRTA Operating Funding Sources

Type of Funding

Fiscal Year 2016

Fiscal Year 2017

State Contract Assistance

$6,836,168

$6,836,168

Federal Grants

3,965,896

3,827,283

Local Assessments

3,309,830

3,384,908

Fare and Terminal Revenue

2,924,506

2,697,517

Other Funds*

44,960

47,695

Total

$17,081,360

$16,793,571

*  Other funds include parking fees, advertising revenue, and reimbursements.

 

During our audit period, MVRTA’s operating costs were as follows.

MVRTA Operating Expenses

Type of Expense

Fiscal Year 2016

Fiscal Year 2017

Transit Service

$11,432,150

$11,513,295

Maintenance

3,872,948

3,470,568

Terminal Expenses

1,123,011

1,189,007

Pensions

764,769

103,313

General and Administrative Expenses

531,861

416,322

Total

$17,724,739

$16,692,505

Vehicle Fleet and Service Route Area

MVRTA operates local fixed-route and demand-response services within the 284-square-mile Merrimack Valley area, serving a population of more than 352,000. It operates a network of 24 local transit routes and 2 commuter routes. The local fixed-route service operates seven days a week; weekday service runs from as early as 5:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Saturday service runs from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., and Sunday service runs from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Buses and vans provide transit services to the vast majority of MVRTA passengers, and its vanpool provides paratransit services. The table below shows the number of revenue-producing and non-revenue-producing vehicles5 used at MVRTA during fiscal years 2016 and 2017.

Number of MVRTA Vehicles

Vehicle Type

Fiscal Year 2016

Fiscal Year 2017

Revenue-Producing

100

102

Non-Revenue-Producing

12

14

Total

112

116

Vehicle Maintenance

MVRTA operates its administrative office and a maintenance facility in an approximately 18,800-square-foot building in Haverhill. At the end of our audit period, MVRTA had a total of 116 vehicles in its fleet. The table below shows the types and average ages of the vehicles in MVRTA’s fleet during the audit period.

MVRTA Vehicle Fleet Average Age

Make and Model

Vehicle Type

Vehicle Count

Average Age (Years)

Gillig Low Floor

Bus

44

4.7

Gillig Phantom

Bus

19

13.5

Ford E350

Van

29

4.3

Ford Taurus

Sedan

1

4.0

Ford Escape

SUV

1

5.0

MCI D4500

Bus

6

3.2

MCI 102D3

Bus

4

17.0

Chevrolet Tahoe

SUV

8

4.0

Chevrolet Silverado

Truck

2

1.0

GMC Sierra

Truck

2

13.5

Total

 

116

 

The table below shows MVRTA’s maintenance expenses for the audit period.

MVRTA Maintenance Expenses

Expenses

Fiscal Year 2016

Fiscal Year 2017

Salaries and Benefits

$1,108,458

$1,093,301

Parts and Equipment

575,766

463,226

Fuel

983,511

758,628

Other Vehicle Maintenance

923,186

877,945

Other Maintenance

282,027

277,468

Total

$3,872,948

$3,470,568

 Below are the actual mileage and maintenance costs per vehicle for fiscal year 2017.

MVRTA Vehicle Mileage and Maintenance Expenses

Make and Model

Vehicle
Count

Total
Mileage

Labor
Cost

Parts
Cost

Total
Maintenance Cost

Average Maintenance Cost per Vehicle

Gillig Low Floor

44

1,530,381

$148,341

$371,638

$519,979

$11,818

Gillig Phantom

19

265,535

32,506

38,453

70,959

$3,735

Ford E350

29

639,949

24,850

18,428

43,277*

$1,492

Ford Taurus

1

3,087

104

5

109

$109

Ford Escape

1

1,369

0

0

0

$0

MCI D4500

6

179,860

15,899

16,975

32,874

$5,479

MCI 102D3

4

37,278

4,308

5,378

9,686

$2,421*

Chevrolet Tahoe

8

103,980

1,857

892

2,749

$344

Chevrolet Silverado

2

10,965

78

8

86

$43

GMC Sierra

2

9,037

510

1,285

$1,796*

$898

Total

116

2,781,441

$228,453

$453,062

$681,516*

 

*    Discrepancies in totals are due to rounding.

 

FTA requires all RTAs to report to it any information related to their transit vehicle inventories or maintenance and repairs that they conduct. This information is included in FTA’s National Transit Database. At the time of our audit, MVRTA was using Ron Turley Associates, Inc. Fleet Management Software to document all of its vehicle asset and expense information and report it to FTA.

MVRTA Community Programs

MVRTA informs the community about its services through local businesses, neighborhood events, and summer festivals. It also coordinates transportation for the councils on aging for several of its member communities. Finally, in an effort to help those with disabilities, MVRTA offers a travel training program on riding its buses.

1.    The communities are Amesbury, Andover, Boxford, Georgetown, Groveland, Haverhill, Lawrence, Merrimac, Methuen, Newbury, Newburyport, North Andover, North Reading, Rowley, Salisbury, and West Newbury.

2.    Demand-response transportation services are those that run on a flexible schedule and on flexible routes based on the needs of RTA passengers with special needs.

3.    Under Section 23 of Chapter 161B of the General Laws, the Commonwealth, through the Executive Office for Administration and Finance, can contract with an RTA to fund 50% of the net cost of the service the RTA provides. Known as state contract assistance, this funding is provided through the Commonwealth Transportation Fund and the Massachusetts Transportation Trust Fund.

4.    Under Section 9 of Chapter 161B of the General Laws, annual local assessment payments are adjusted based on the “loss” (operating cost minus revenue) for each specific transit route and the activity and the share of that loss attributable to each town or city.

5.    Non-revenue-producing vehicles are light-duty vehicles for temporary use by MVRTA employees for agency-related business.

Date published: July 31, 2018

Help Us Improve Mass.gov with your feedback

Feedback