Organization: | Office of the State Auditor |
---|---|
Date published: | March 4, 2025 |
Executive Summary
In accordance with Section 12 of Chapter 11 of the Massachusetts General Laws, the Office of the State Auditor has conducted a performance audit of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) for the period June 1, 2020 through December 31, 2023.
The purpose of our audit was to determine whether the MBTA effectively administered certain aspects of its contract with Keolis Commuter Services, LLC, referred to in this report as Keolis. Under this contract, Keolis has maintained and operated the MBTA’s commuter rail system since July 1, 2014.
In this performance audit, we determined the following:
- whether the MBTA ensured that Keolis met the performance requirements outlined in Section 2 of Schedule 6.1 of the MBTA’s “Commuter Rail Operating Agreement 159–12” with Keolis;
- whether the MBTA enforced the required report deadlines in Section 2.1.4 of Schedule 3.14 of the MBTA’s “Commuter Rail Operating Agreement 159–12” with Keolis that are related to the performance requirements in Section 2 of Schedule 6.1 of this contract; and
- whether the MBTA enforced the performance incentive payment caps outlined in Section 6.5 of Schedule 6.1 of the MBTA’s “Commuter Rail Operating Agreement 159–12” with Keolis and Section 4.2 of Schedule 17 of the “Revenue Growth Service Change Agreement.”
Below is a summary of our findings, the effects of those findings, and our recommendations, with links to each page listed.
Finding 1 | The MBTA did not accurately assess performance-based incentives and penalties for Keolis. a. The MBTA did not assess approximately $3,324,126 worth of performance-based penalties for Keolis. b. The MBTA inappropriately assessed approximately $257,724 worth of performance-based penalties against Keolis. c. The MBTA overpaid Keolis by approximately $105,810 in performance-based incentives. d. The MBTA underpaid Keolis by $105,210 in performance-based incentives it had achieved. |
Effect | Performance-based penalties and incentives are designed to incentivize vendors to achieve certain quality or timeliness standards and to hold them accountable for meeting agreed-upon service levels. Failing to accurately assess these penalties and incentives undermines accountability and reduces the incentive for vendors to meet expectations. It also diminishes the overall quality and reliability of the MBTA’s commuter rail services. In this instance, the MBTA failed to assess millions of dollars of financial penalties that could have helped improve service for MBTA customers. This represents a financial loss to the MBTA and could lead to other financial losses, as poorer service may result in fewer riders. Failure to properly assess incentives and penalties could also reduce the public’s trust in the MBTA and harm its relationship with a vendor that relied on the MBTA’s calculations of incentives and penalties. |
Recommendations |
|
Finding 2 | The MBTA did not maintain sufficient documentation of certain inspections designed to evaluate Keolis’s performance. |
Effect | The MBTA and its customers are exposed to safety risks if the MBTA fails to properly manage resolution of issues at commuter rail stations and with regard to snow and ice. This can result in avoidable injuries or accidents and financial loss. Failure to properly document the management of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) inspections can result in unnecessary inconvenience or denial of service to residents and can create avoidable financial risk for the MBTA. Failure to appropriately oversee the fare collection efforts of its contractor and coach and locomotive availability can result in the perception of unfairness for riders, reduction in service levels during peak times, and the loss of ridership and contractor-penalty revenue for the MBTA. Proper documentation of inspections is crucial for evaluating performance and ensuring that agreed-upon service levels are met. Without these records, it can be impossible for the MBTA to properly manage its operations and challenging to address any potential shortcomings or hold the responsible parties accountable. |
Recommendations |
|
Finding 3 | The MBTA did not always enforce the monthly and annual performance incentive payment caps. |
Effect | As a result, the MBTA is paying Keolis more than is permitted under contract for monthly and annual performance incentives. |
Recommendations |
|
Finding 4 | The MBTA did not ensure that Keolis submitted required reports relating to fare collection revenue and fleet maintenance on time and did not penalize Keolis for noncompliance. |
Effect | Not requiring Keolis to submit Operator Deliverable Requirement List (ODRL) reports in a timely manner deprived MBTA operations and management personnel members of information needed to make decisions and monitor performance. Because the MBTA also failed to assess an estimated $255,000 in penalties, this also resulted in a loss of revenue that must be compensated for through additional funding from riders or the Commonwealth and its taxpayers. |
Recommendation | The MBTA should establish sufficient policies and procedures to monitor the receipt, review, and follow-up of reports that are required to be submitted by Keolis to the MBTA, per the executed contract. This should include appropriate monitoring and reporting components, as well as a financial review, to ensure that appropriate penalties are assessed and collected. |
Finding 5 | The MBTA did not ensure that Keolis employees who had access to the Train Resource Management System (TRMS) completed annual cybersecurity awareness training. |
Effect | If the MBTA does not ensure that its contracted service provider’s employees with access to the MBTA’s information technology systems complete annual cybersecurity awareness training, then the MBTA exposes itself to an increased risk of cybersecurity attacks and financial and/or reputational losses. In addition, the integrity and security of information in TRMS, which is used to monitor all aspects of commuter rail performance, may become compromised. |
Recommendations |
|
Finding 6 | The MBTA does not have an internal control plan. |
Effect | Without a sufficiently developed internal control plan, based on a department-wide risk assessment, the MBTA is limited in its ability to identify vulnerabilities, which could prevent it from achieving organizational goals and objectives. This also exposes the MBTA to heightened risks in its operations. |
Recommendations |
|
In addition, while we were conducting our audit, additional issues came to our attention which we have outlined in the “Other Matters” section of this report. These issues relate to the MBTA's monitoring of Keolis’s compliance with Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) requirements, including a $425,000 settlement between Keolis and a DBE firm that involved non-disclosure and non-disparagement clauses, as well as delays in the audit process caused by inconsistent and inaccurate information provided by the MBTA.
Table of Contents
Appendix
Downloads
-
Open PDF file, 992.24 KB, Audit Report - Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority—Keolis Contract (English, PDF 992.24 KB)
Contact
Phone
Online
Fax
Address
Room 230
Boston, MA 02133