- Posted: June 7, 2018 4:28 p.m.
- Last Updated: July 13, 2018 12:31 a.m.
- This page, Licensing Committee Meeting – Topics of Discussion, is offered by
- Board of Registration in Medicine
Public Meeting Notice Licensing Committee Meeting – Topics of Discussion
Overview of Licensing Committee Meeting – Topics of Discussion
Public Meeting of the Licensing Committee
Agenda
Presiding: Robin Richman, M.D. and Michael Medlock, M.D.
Public Session I
Executive Session I*
- Minutes
- Licensing Cases
Public Session II
- Minutes
- Ghousia Alikhan, M.D. – Request for waiver of substantial equivalency
- Lelia Logue, M.D. – Request for waiver of substantial equivalency
- Shreya Madhavaram, M.D. – Request for waiver of substantial equivalency
Executive Session II*
- Minutes
- Licensing Cases
Public Session III
- Marc Goldman, M.D. – Request for waiver of the seven-year rule
- Mary Ruisi, M.D. – No clinical practice for over two years
- Cai Sherry Wen, M.D. – Extended postgraduate training, below average ratings
- Olaf Bodamer, M.D. – Waiver of examination requirement, licensure pursuant to Sluzki amendment
- Benjamin Drapkin, M.D. – Request for ninth limited license
- Neha Joshi, M.D. – Request for waiver of substantial equivalency
- Adrian Marino-Enriquez, M.D. – Temporary faculty license
- Katie Moynihan, MBBS – Temporary faculty license
- John Quatromoni, M.D. – Lapsed license over two years, no clinical practice for over four years
- Vijay Ganesh, M.D. – Request for joint degree waiver of the seven-year rule
- Items not reasonably anticipated by the Chair 48 hours in advance of the meeting
- Adjournment
________________________
*The Committee will meet in Executive Session as authorized pursuant to M.G.L. chapter 30A, § 21(a)(1) and (7), for the purpose of discussing the reputation, character, physical condition or mental health, rather than the professional competence, of an individual, or to discuss the discipline or dismissal of, or complaints or charges brought against, a public officer, employee, staff member or individual. Specifically, the Board will discuss and evaluate the reputation, character, physical condition or mental health, rather than professional competence, of applicants relevant to their applications for licensure and to discuss reports that are confidential pursuant to law.