• This page, Cozy Corner Adult Day Health Did Not Properly Document Physician Orders and Clinical Authorizations in Member Records to Support Adult Day Health Services It Billed., is   offered by
  • Office of the State Auditor

Cozy Corner Adult Day Health Did Not Properly Document Physician Orders and Clinical Authorizations in Member Records to Support Adult Day Health Services It Billed.

The audit found the provider did not have physician orders for all 47 adult day MassHealth members.

Table of Contents

Overview

During our audit period, Cozy Corner Adult Day Health provided adult day health (ADH) services totaling $955,587 to 47 MassHealth members; however, for all 47 members, it lacked the physician orders and/or clinical authorizations necessary to substantiate the types of services each member was authorized to receive. Specifically, Cozy Corner did not have physician orders for 43 of the 47 MassHealth members, and for the remaining 4 members who were enrolled with MassHealth senior care organizations (SCOs), it did not obtain the required clinical authorizations before providing ADH services. Without physician orders and/or clinical authorizations being obtained before ADH services were provided, there is a higher-than-acceptable risk that Cozy Corner may not have provided the appropriate types of services to members.

After we discussed these matters with Cozy Corner management, the program director contacted the members’ physicians and retroactively obtained the physician orders. However, while reviewing the physician orders that were ultimately obtained, we found that only 1 of the 47 detailed the assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), and/or skilled nursing services, that the member required. The remaining 46 physician orders did not provide details on which specific ADLs or skilled nursing services the members should receive. Therefore, they were still inadequate, because MassHealth requires that ADH providers use the list of services with which a member requires assistance, as detailed by the physician orders, to develop the member’s individual care plan.

Authoritative Guidance

MassHealth’s transmittal letter ADH-25, which amended Section 404 of Title 130 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations (CMR) as of March 2010, states,

An ADH provider must obtain clinical authorization prior to initial service commencement, transfer from one ADH provider to another, or recommencement of services if there has been a six-month gap in the delivery of ADH services. . . .

(2)  Physician’s Documentation.

(a)  Before the member’s first attendance day, the ADH provider must obtain the necessary documentation from the member’s physician.

(b)  The physician’s documentation must include

(i)   physician orders for adult day health services. . . .

(c)  In the case of an emergency service commencement, the ADH provider must request from [MassHealth] an extension of the physician’s documentation requirements. The program must obtain the physician’s signature as evidence of review of the quarterly care plan within three business days.

(3)  Member Care Plan.

(a)  Care Plan Development: Within six business days after a member’s date of service commencement, the ADH provider’s staff must complete an adult day health care plan for the member. The ADH provider’s registered nurse must coordinate the development of the member care plan. The plan must include

  1. a treatment plan based on the member’s physician’s orders.

Reasons for Noncompliance

Regarding the missing physician orders and the physician orders that did not list ADLs and/or skilled nursing services, Cozy Corner’s program director told us that MassHealth regulations were, in her opinion, “vague and confusing.” She added that Cozy Corner’s nursing staff members create member care plans based on their own clinical assessments of the members. Cozy Corner then sends each care plan to the member’s physician for approval, asking them to sign and date the summary page of the plan and return it to Cozy Corner. Cozy Corner considers this signed and dated page the official physician order. However, this is not consistent with MassHealth regulations, which require that a physician order be issued before the member receives any ADH services and that the ADH provider develop each member’s individual care plan based on this physician order. It should be noted that during our audit, we reexamined all of the care plans developed by Cozy Corner for MassHealth members and found that for 28 members, the care plans were not signed and dated by the physicians until after the members started receiving services.

Regarding the four missing clinical authorizations, Cozy Corner’s program director / owner believed that the forms Cozy Corner received from MassHealth’s agent, Old Colony Elder Services,1 and retained in member records were MassHealth’s clinical authorizations for SCO members. However, Old Colony Elder Services management told us that this particular form is not the required clinical authorization form for SCO members.

Recommendations

  1. MassHealth should determine how much of the $955,587 discussed in this finding should be repaid and seek reimbursement.
  2. If Cozy Corner believes that any of the requirements established by MassHealth regulations are unclear, it should contact MassHealth for guidance and clarification.
  3. Cozy Corner should ensure that completed and authorized physician orders and clinical authorizations are in place before it provides ADH services to MassHealth members. The orders should indicate which ADL and/or skilled nursing services members require and be used to develop members’ individual care plans.

MassHealth’s Response

Since 2015, MassHealth has been systematically strengthening its internal controls and program integrity capacity. Specifically, MassHealth identified adult day health services, a component of the Long Term Services and Supports program, as a service for increased oversight. Since 2016, MassHealth has undertaken the following program integrity initiatives in the ADH program.

  • In 2016 and 2017, MassHealth conducted a series of audits of ADH providers. MassHealth utilized the information obtained through these audits to identify specific targeted approaches toward increasing program integrity in the ADH program.
  • In 2017, based on MassHealth’s audit findings, MassHealth began revising its ADH provider regulations with the goal of strengthening ADH program integrity.
  • In July 2018, MassHealth promulgated the revised ADH provider regulations. The revised regulations, among other things, clarified clinical eligibility requirements and tightened provider eligibility requirements.
  • In August 2018, MassHealth conducted statewide trainings for ADH providers to ensure a consistent understanding and knowledge about the revised regulations.
  • In September 2018, MassHealth issued an ADH provider bulletin requiring all ADH providers to reassess their member’s clinical eligibility for ADH services pursuant to the revised ADH provider regulations.
  • In November 2018, MassHealth developed an audit tool to be used for systematic monthly on-site audits of ADH providers. These systematic audits began in January 2019.

Future program integrity efforts for the ADH program include the following:

  • In January 2019, MassHealth is commencing educational visits with ADH providers on location. These site visits will be conducted by field nurse staff and will provide feedback to ADH programs on MassHealth requirements for the provision of ADH services.
  • In spring 2019, MassHealth intends to submit a request to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for a temporary moratorium on the enrollment of new ADH providers into the MassHealth program. The temporary moratorium will enable MassHealth to continue strengthening program integrity activities to scale for existing ADH providers.
  • In summer 2019, MassHealth will implement Prior Authorization (PA) requirements for the provision of ADH services. With the advent of PA requirements, ADH providers will be required to (1) provide documentation justifying a member’s clinical eligibility for ADH services, as well as (2) submit physician orders to MassHealth in order to obtain authorization to provide ADH services to the Member and prior to rendering and billing for ADH services provided to the member.

Regarding the audit finding and recommendations in the audit, we agree with the recommendations and recommend that the provider act in accordance with them, and as described below. . . .

MassHealth will use [the Office of the State Auditor’s (OSA’s)] audit as the basis for its own audit of Cozy Corner. Given that four out of 47 members were in the SCO program, MassHealth will also communicate with SCOs regarding the audit findings related to SCO encounter data. . . .

MassHealth will provide guidance and clarification to Cozy Corner on any questions Cozy Corner has with regard to requirements of the ADH program regulations. . . .

MassHealth promulgated revised ADH program regulations in July of 2018. Among other changes, the revised ADH program regulations clarify clinical eligibility requirements for MassHealth coverage of ADH services. MassHealth is also in the process of implementing Prior Authorization (PA) requirements for ADH services that will require ADH providers to obtain PA from MassHealth prior to providing a Member with MassHealth covered ADH services. MassHealth agrees with the recommendation to the extent it aligns with the revised ADH program regulations and the PA requirement MassHealth is in the process of implementing.

 

Auditee’s Response

In response to this finding, an attorney representing Cozy Corner provided the following comments:

Cozy Corner adamantly denies the Report’s allegations that it violated any MassHealth regulations or received an overpayment. . . .

While the Report alleges that Cozy Corner lacked a physician order for 43 out of the 47 Members that it treated during the Audit Period, Cozy Corner does in fact have documentation for each such Member which it asserts constitutes such a physician order. Before any Member begins receiving ADH services from Cozy Corner, he or she must first obtain a Cozy Corner participant application and Cozy Corner’s physical evaluation form. The Member subsequently brings the form to his or her primary care physician (“PCP”) who performs a physical evaluation and completes the form. Typically, the form includes a statement for the PCP to read, date, and sign, once he or she completes the physical evaluation, which states that the PCP orders that the Member should receive ADH services from Cozy Corner. The PCP then faxes the completed form, including the order for ADH services, back to Cozy Corner. Upon receipt of the form and the order, and the completed participation application, Cozy Corner will accept the Member as a participant and begin providing ADH services.

Cozy Corner asserts that the statement signed by the PCP ordering the Member to receive ADH services constitutes a “physician order” pursuant to 130 CMR 404.406(F)(2)(a)–(b). Cozy Corner acknowledges, however, that in the 43 instances identified by the State Auditor, the physical evaluation form that it had on record for the Member in question did not include such an order by the PCP. Cozy Corner has determined that this occurred due to a clerical error which resulted in earlier versions of Cozy Corner’s physical evaluation form being sent to PCPs. These earlier versions did not include the order for the PCP to sign. Cozy Corner regrets that it did not identify this issue sooner but, due to the fact that its general practice is to always obtain the order by the PCP prior to providing ADH services, it candidly states that its failure to do so in these 43 instances should not constitute a $955,587 mistake.

In support of the notion that Cozy Corner has always sought to act in good faith and adhere to the MassHealth regulations, Cozy Corner states that, once the State Auditor informed it of the clerical error described above, it contacted the PCP for each of the 43 Members and had these PCPs sign off on retroactive orders that each Member should have begun receiving ADH services as of their Cozy Corner start date. Cozy Corner thus now has what it asserts to be a physician order for each of the 43 Members. The Report claims that these retroactive orders are invalid. The Report does not, however, provide any reasoning or justification as to why these retroactive orders—or Cozy Corner’s general practice of always obtaining a physician order via the physical evaluation form—are/is invalid. “Physician order” is not a term which the MassHealth regulations define and the Report advances no evidence as to why the documentation in Cozy Corner’s possession does not constitute physician orders. . . .

Cozy Corner also has the clinical authorizations for the remaining four Members, who were enrolled in SCO. Cozy Corner received each of these clinical authorizations from Old Colony Elder Services (“Old Colony”), the primary Aging Services Access Point that Cozy Corner uses. Contrary to the Report’s allegation that Old Colony’s management told the State Auditor that the forms in Cozy Corner’s possession do not constitute clinical authorizations, Cozy Corner has an email from Old Colony’s management which states that the documentation in Cozy Corner’s possession constitutes valid Old Colony clinical authorizations for each of the four Members.

Auditor’s Reply

Despite what it asserts in its response, Cozy Corner did not always have adequate documentation on file at the time it began providing services to MassHealth members. Specifically, as stated above, it did not have physician orders for 43 of the 47 sampled MassHealth members. In addition, for the 4 members who were enrolled with a MassHealth SCO, it did not obtain the required clinical authorizations before providing ADH services.

In its response, Cozy Corner refers to other documentation (participant application and physical evaluation forms) that it believes constitutes physician orders. During our audit, we also reviewed this documentation in each member’s file and found similar problems. For example, only 3 members in our sample had physical evaluation forms that were properly completed, signed, and dated before they received services at Cozy Corner. Twenty-six members’ files did not contain any physical evaluation forms, 17 had physical evaluation forms that did not contain specific orders from a physician to receive ADH services, and 1 had a physical evaluation form dated January 2018 even though the member had been receiving services since May 13, 2014. Based on this, we believe that our conclusion that Cozy Corner did not have adequate documentation on file when it began providing services to the members in question is reasonable and fully supported by our audit work.

We acknowledge that when we brought this matter to the attention of Cozy Corner’s management, it took prompt actions to address our concerns. However, we still found problems with the physician orders Cozy Corner ultimately obtained and provided. Specifically, as noted in our finding, only 1 of the 47 physician orders detailed the assistance with ADLs and/or skilled nursing services that the member required. Moreover, as noted in the finding, MassHealth regulations require that a physician order be obtained before a member receives any services. However, most of the members in our sample had received many months (up to two years) of ADH services without properly signed and dated physician orders on file.

In its response, Cozy Corner asserts that it has an email from Old Colony’s management stating that the documentation in Cozy Corner’s possession constitutes valid Old Colony clinical authorizations for each of the four members enrolled with a MassHealth SCO. Because Cozy Corner did not share a copy of this email with OSA during the audit, we did not have the opportunity to follow up with Old Colony to assess its validity and therefore cannot comment on this assertion. However, during our audit we examined the documents that Cozy Corner refers to, discussed them with Old Colony officials, and concluded that they did not constitute clinical authorizations, but rather were referrals to Cozy Corner by Old Colony and not by the members’ primary care physicians. In support of this, Old Colony officials told us that members who are enrolled with SCOs are required to obtain authorizations from their SCOs to obtain any long-term care services, including ADH services, in accordance with 130 CMR 508.008(C). That regulation states,

When a member chooses to enroll in a senior care organization (SCO) in accordance with the requirements under 130 CMR 508.008, the SCO will deliver the member’s primary care and will authorize, arrange, integrate, and coordinate the provision of all covered services for the member. Upon enrollment, each SCO is required to provide evidence of its coverage, including a complete list of participating providers, the range of available covered services, what to do for emergency conditions and urgent care needs, and how to obtain access to covered services such as specialty, behavioral health, and long-term-care services.

For this reason, we did not consider the referrals from Old Colony clinical authorizations.

Finally, although our audit report points out that Cozy Corner provided ADH services totaling $955,587 to members without adequate documentation of physician authorization before services were rendered, this $955,587 represents the total amount billed by Cozy Corner for these members during the entire audit period. It will be MassHealth’s responsibility to determine what amount should be recovered.

1.    Old Colony Elder Services, located in Brockton, is the primary Aging Services Access Point that Cozy Corner uses.

Date published: March 15, 2019

Help Us Improve Mass.gov  with your feedback

Please do not include personal or contact information.
Feedback