Decision

Decision  Camilo Diaz Puntiel v. Demoulas Supermarket

Date: 07/12/2018
Organization: Department of Industrial Accidents
Docket Number: DIA Board No. 027158-13
Location: Boston
  • Employee: Camilo Diaz Puntiel
  • Employer: Demoulas Supermarket
  • Insurer: Demoulas Supermarket

LONG, J.  The employee appeals from a decision denying his claim for § 34A benefits.  He argues that the administrative judge erroneously awarded § 35 benefits  because: 1) the judge awarded § 35 benefits during a period for which the self-insurer had paid § 34 benefits; 2) the judge misunderstood the employee’s burden of proof as the employee was only required to establish there had been no improvement in his condition to prove entitlement to § 34A benefits; and, 3) the judge failed to perform an adequate analysis in determining the employee’s earning capacity.  For the following reasons, we recommit the case to the judge for further findings.

Table of Contents

Downloads   for Camilo Diaz Puntiel v. Demoulas Supermarket

Help Us Improve Mass.gov  with your feedback

Please do not include personal or contact information.
Feedback