[Seventh Amended - applicable to all civil actions filed in the Superior Court]
Applicable to all counties
[Seventh Amended - applicable to all civil actions filed in the Superior Court]
Applicable to all counties
Responding to and complying with the directive of the Supreme Judicial Court for “. . . an attack on excessive delay and excessive cost of court proceedings . . .” and in an effort to “secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action,” Mass. R. Civ. P. 1, the Justices of the Superior Court, through our Chief Justice, hereby adopt these time standards as a standing order of the Superior Court (“Standing Order”). The Court recognizes that the litigation process is memory dependent. To the extent that memory dims or becomes unreliable over prolonged periods of time, a just determination may be jeopardized. The concept of early and continuous judicial supervision and control is intended to enhance the quality of litigation and ensure that justice is fairly rendered.
This Standing Order recognizes that there are viable alternative methods of dispute resolution that may avoid delay and reduce the expense inherent in court proceedings, such as mediation, arbitration, summary jury trials, mini-trials, and reference to masters. Such alternate methods of dispute resolution are compatible with the case management objectives of these time standards. Nothing in this Standing Order shall act as a bar to any form of early intervention by the Court to identify cases suitable for alternative dispute resolution.
The Court recognizes and is sensitive to the impact that this Standing Order will have on local legal culture. We have meticulously avoided intrusion into this rich culture except to the extent necessary to preserve to the Court its responsibility to manage the pace of litigation without disturbing the harmony of the trial bar.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
All civil actions shall be designated for purposes of this Standing Order as falling within one of three tracks based on the nature of the case:
A list of case types with track designations, noted in parentheses, appears at the end of this Standing Order.
The plaintiff shall indicate the nature of the action and the appropriate track designation on the Civil Action Cover Sheet.1
For good cause shown, a party may move that a case be designated to a track other than the track selected by the plaintiff on the Civil Action Cover Sheet. The motion shall comply with Superior Court Rule 9A, and shall be referred to the attention of the Session Judge.
By order of the Court, or stipulation of the parties, a civil action shall be assigned to an individual track, which shall supersede the requirements of this Standing Order, provided that all deadlines in the individual track occur no later than the tracking order dates applicable to the case type, as established by Part F of this Standing Order, Tracking Deadlines, below.
Any party wishing assignment to an individual track must complete and submit the form “Motion for Case-Specific Management” appearing in the Appendix of Forms to the Superior Court Rules and available for download on the Superior Court’s webpage. See Superior Court Rule 20.
The Session Judge will endorse the Motion for Case-Specific Management in accordance with Superior Court Rules 9A and 20.
While the clerk shall provide notice to all parties and their counsel of the track designation and corresponding tracking deadlines, the final responsibility for obtaining information from the clerk about the designation of the case and the corresponding tracking order shall rest with each party. Notification shall occur as follows:
This Standing Order anticipates that there will be instances when the designation of a case to a particular track is inappropriate or the tracking deadlines cannot reasonably be met. The Court recognizes that there are cases which by their nature require special tracking deadlines, and the system is sufficiently flexible to accommodate these cases as follows:
This Standing Order also recognizes that the parties may benefit from a conference under Mass. R. Civ. P. 16 to address matters that may aid in resolving a case or reducing the duration or expense of litigation. Any party may ask the Court for a Rule 16 conference and such requests will be honored if reasonable. The Court may also schedule a Rule 16 conference on its own initiative. Rule 16 conferences may be held by videoconference, in accordance with Standing Order 1–22, or by telephone, by arrangement with the Court.
The following tracking deadlines shall be mandatory except as modified by order of the Session Judge or Regional Administrative Justice.4 Documents filed outside the tracking deadlines without leave of court need not be acted on by the Court, even if filed by agreement between the parties. The tracking deadlines for F and A Track cases will be calculated from the date of filing of the complaint.
The remaining tracking deadlines assume that a motion for summary judgment has been filed. If no summary judgment motion is filed, earlier tracking deadlines may be set by the Court.
The remaining tracking deadlines assume that a motion for summary judgment will be filed. If no summary judgment motion is filed, earlier tracking dates can be set by the Court.
Any case not reached for trial or otherwise disposed within the prescribed tracking deadline shall be referred to the attention of the Regional Administrative Justice, who shall coordinate with the Session Judge to ensure a speedy disposition within the session or reassignment to another session.
The Regional Administrative Justice shall maintain a record of all cases not tried or otherwise not disposed as required under this Standing Order, setting forth the reason for the trial delay and the action taken to resolve the matter.
Shortly before each jury trial, the Court shall hold a final trial conference, unless otherwise ordered by the Session Judge or Regional Administrative Justice. The clerk shall schedule the final trial conference to occur before the trial judge whenever possible and shall notify all parties of the time, date, and location of the final trial conference. The final trial conference may be held by videoconference, in accordance with Standing Order 1–22, or by telephone, by arrangement with the Court.
In cases to be tried by a jury, the clerk’s notice (“Notice to Appear for Final Trial Conference”) shall inform the parties that:
The purpose of the final trial conference is to discuss the matters set forth in Superior Court Rule 6(2)(a) and other matters that may arise at trial, including without limitation those matters set forth in subparagraph 2(b) below, as well as the estimated length of the trial; any scheduling constraints affecting witnesses or other trial participants; any need for an interpreter for a party or witness, including the specific language involved and the date and time when interpretation is required; the number of jurors to be seated; any agreement to allow deliberation by fewer jurors if seated jurors are dismissed post-empanelment; the content and method of employing any supplemental juror questionnaire; the number of peremptories; the order and timing of the parties’ assertions of challenges for cause and peremptory challenges; and any other matter affecting the efficiency and fairness of the trial.
Not less than five business days before the final trial conference, the parties shall submit the following, unless otherwise ordered by the Court:
Trial counsel for the parties and any self-represented parties must confer sufficiently in advance of the final trial conference to discuss the matters set forth in subparagraphs 2(a) and 2(b) above, and to file the required information in the Court no less than five business days before the final trial conference.