MGL c.6 s.178C-178Q Sex Offender Registry Law
MGL c.123A Sexually Dangerous Persons
MGL c.265, s.48 Sex offenders may not engage in ice cream truck vending
803 CMR 1 Sex Offender Registry Board
Selected federal laws
42 USC s. 13663 Ineligibility of Dangerous Sex Offenders for Admission to Public Housing
42 USC ss. 16911-16929 Sex Offender Registration and Notification
Selected case law
Coe, et al. v. Sex Offenders Registry Board , 442 Mass. 250 (2004)
Permits posting of Level 3 Sex Offender information on the Internet.
Commonwealth v. Blake , 454 Mass. 267 (2009)
The Massachusetts SJC decided that judges have within 30 days of a trial to issue rulings in regards to deciding whether a defendant should be held indefinitely as a sexually dangerous offender.
Commonwealth v. Cole , 468 Mass. 294 (2014). Court held that "community parole supervision for life" under MGL c.127, s.133D (c) is an unconstitutional violation of separation of powers. The court determined that severing that section was not the proper remedy, and so decided to "strike § 133D in its entirety and order that CPSL sentences,whether imposed pursuant to G. L. c. 6, § 178H (a), or G. L. c. 265, § 45, be vacated."
Commonwealth v. Cory , 454 Mass. 559 (2009)
Because MGL c.265, § 47 is punitive in effect, a sex offender convicted before the effective date of § 47 (December 20, 2006) cannot be required "to be monitored by the probation department with a GPS tracking device during his probationary term" as required by that statute.
Commonwealth v. Hunt , 462 Mass. 807 (2012)
"Where sex offender treatment is conditioned on a waiver of confidentiality, refusal of treatment alone is insufficient to support an inference that the prisoner does not want to be treated. ... Therefore, although evidence that a defendant in an SDP civil commitment proceeding did not receive sex offender treatment is admissible, we conclude that it is error to admit evidence that a defendant refused sex offender treatment where he could receive such treatment only by waiving confidentiality."
Commonwealth v. Wimer, 480 Mass. 1 (2018)
Where a defendant committed two separate offenses of open and gross lewdness, but pled guilty to both in the same proceeding, he did not have a "second and subsequent" conviction, and thus, was not required to register as a sex offender.
Doe v. Boston Police Commissioner , 460 Mass. 342 (2011).
A level three sex offender was entitled to a hearing before MGL c.6, s.178K (2)(e) (barring level three offenders from rest homes) could be applied against him.
Doe v. City of Lynn , 472 Mass. 521 (2015).
A city ordinance that limited where sex offenders could live was unconstitutional, where the fabric of state law "evinces the Legislature's intent to have the first and final word on the subject of residency of sex offenders."
Doe v. Sex Offenders Registry Board , 460 Mass. 336 (2011).
The right to a classification hearing is not waived by failure to appear. The Sex Offender Registry Board exceeded its authority in enacting 803 CMR 1.13(2) .
Doe, Sex Offender Registry Bd. No. 16748 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd. , 82 Mass. App. Ct. 152 (2012)
"[T]he board lacked authority to adopt regulations purporting to authorize it to declare that the classification level could be increased absent conviction of a new sex offense."
Doe, SORB No. 380316 v. Sex Offender Registry Board , 473 Mass. 297 (2015)
"In light of the new implications of classification at a given risk level," the Sex Offender Registry Board must establish the sex offender's risk of reoffense by clear and convincing evidence. This is a change from the previous standard of proof of a preponderance of the evidence. "Because our decision is a new constitutional rule, the higher standard should be applied retroactively only to classification proceedings pending before SORB, the Superior Court, or the appellate courts on the date of the issuance of the rescript in this case."
Green, petitioner , 475 Mass 624 (2016)
The Supreme Judicial Court further clarified the role of a qualified examiner under M.G.L. chap 123A sec. 9. “[A] finding of sexual dangerousness must be based, at least in part, on credible examiner opinion testimony and that a jury instruction to that effect is essential to the informed exercise of the jury's fact-finding function.”
L.L. v. Commonwealth , 470 Mass. 169 (2014)
Outlines requirements for judge in determining whether to relieve juvenile of obligation to register. Also encourages judges to issue written findings. "Although a Juvenile Court judge is not obligated to issue written findings under § 178E (f), and although the judge's process of determining a juvenile sex offender's relief from registration under this section may be less formal than the process required by the board under § 178K (2) (d), it is important nonetheless for the judge to explain on the record with some specificity the reasons for his or her assessment of risk of reoffense and resulting determination whether the juvenile should be relieved of the obligation to register."
Moe v. Sex Offender Registry Board , 467 Mass. 598 (2014).
Amended law requiring publication on the Internet of the sex offender registry information of individuals who were finally classified as level two sex offenders cannot be applied retroactively to those who were classified before the law was passed.
Noe, SORB No. 5340 v. Sex Offender Registry Board, 480 Mass. 195 (2018)
"In sex offender reclassification proceedings involving an individual seeking downward reclassification, the Sex Offender Registry Board is constitutionally required to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the classification remains current and correct, and this court further concluded that the sex offender seeking reclassification bears a burden of production to demonstrate some change in his or her circumstances. Doe, SORB 76819 v. Sex Offender Registry Board, 480 Mass. 212, decided the same day, requires the same burdens of proof and production in proceedings to terminate a sex offender's duty to register.
R.B., petitioner, 479 Mass. 712 (2018)
"Given the fundamental liberty interest at stake in sexual dangerousness proceedings, this court concluded that it was appropriate for it to review arguments raised for the first time on appeal, and that in doing so, the court would review for a substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice."
Search sex offender information
Information About Sex Offenders, Mass. Sex Offender Registry Board
How to Search Sex Offender Information in Massachusetts
National Sex Offender Public Registry , US Dept. of Justice
Allows the user to search sex offender information from all states' individual databases at the same time. Searches must be done by name, not just by locality
Sex Offender Registry Practice, 2d ed. MCLE, looseleaf.
Trying Sex Offense Cases in Massachusetts, 2d ed., MCLE, looseleaf.
|Last updated:||August 20, 2018|