Section 3-909
Unless the distribution or payment no longer can be questioned because of adjudication, estoppel, or limitation, a distributee of property improperly distributed or paid, or a claimant who was improperly paid, is liable to return the property improperly received and its income since distribution if he has the property. If he does not have the property, then he is liable to return the value as of the date of disposition of the property improperly received and its income and gain received by him.
Comment
The term “improperly” as used in this section must be read in light of Section 3-703 and the manifest purpose of this and other sections of the Code to shift questions concerning the propriety of various distributions from the fiduciary to the distributees in order to prevent every administration from becoming an adjudicated matter. Thus, a distribution may be “authorized at the time” as contemplated by Section 3-703, and still be “improper” under this section. Section 3-703 is designed to permit a personal representative to distribute without risk in some cases, even though there has been no adjudication. When an unadjudicated distribution has occurred, the rights of persons to show that the basis for the distribution (e.g., an informally probated will, or informally issued letters of administration) is incorrect, or that the basis was improperly applied (erroneous interpretation, for example) is preserved against distributees by this section.
The definition of “distributee” to include the trustee and beneficiary of a testamentary trust in 1-201(13) is important in allocating liabilities that may arise under Sections 3-909 and 3-910 on improper distribution by the personal representative under an informally probated will. The provisions of 3-909 and 3-910 are based on the theory that liability follows the property and the fiduciary is absolved from liability by reliance upon the informally probated will.